|
i'm glad there are people dumb enough not to block ads so that free stuff remains free
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2017 18:11
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 17:15 |
|
|
i don't use chrome, op. google approved or not i still won't see those ads
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
so how big will the migration from chrome to firefox be, do you think
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
if ads weren't a massive vector for 0day 'sploitz and also if i was profoundly retarded, i might consider not blocking ads
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
that's something i don't get. people who hate ads enough to block them aren't going to jump in their car and go buy whatever crap you're peddling, so why insist on shoving ads in their face? seems to me they're helping you narrow down your target audience
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
lots of people desperately trying to make an obsolete model work, like geography-based content distribution rights in the digital age.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
i don't use chrome, op
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
pagancow posted:lol google to not be beat by ad blocking racketeering has become the largest ad blocking service in the world now pagancow posted:i just want to raise my glass of apple juice to all the ad block gangsters who made this possible, now the world is truely a better place pagancow posted:Google can now block ssl certs, and content at will lol this will be grand and play out in a totally ethical way across the world. i don't use chrome, op, and neither should you
|
|
#
¿
Aug 15, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
i look at metacritic scores and user reviews, lol if you trust journalism in this day and age, especially for games
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2017 21:13
|
|
|
which is why you read them. most upvoted user reviews aren't garbage political poo poo flinging. it doesn't take very long to gather what's wrong with a game
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
the dying gasps of an obsolete business model
|
|
#
¿
Aug 18, 2017 14:13
|
|
|
i wouldn't mind paying for good content, except i know they'd still shove ads down my throat. also the content would still suck because why make an attempt at actual journalism when you can just copy/paste a press release and call it an article
|
|
#
¿
Aug 21, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
mulligan posted:people who think ads don't work on them, they do. Ads are info on brands or stuff you buy, whatever product you have on your head right now is product of tom (top of mind) and that was ad generated, either atl/btl / digital etc the products i have in mind right now were personally tested or recommended by people i trust in such matters. your cancerous money furnace of an industry had nothing to do with it at the very best, an ad leaves me indifferent toward whatever crap it's peddling. most of the time though it makes me actively hostile toward it, depending how dumb the ad was hth
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2017 02:59
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 17:15 |
|
|
what's even the argument here? i see an ad and think about how lovely it was for a few seconds, it's a win? all publicity is good publicity? this is getting bitcoin levels of pathetic i worked in telemarketing as a starving college student too so, yes, i know it works on some people, just like nigerian scams do. it doesn't work on a mass scale. stop huffing your own farts
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2017 06:32
|
|