Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

R. Guyovich posted:

dprk hates and murders christians

this building is actually under a giant box propped up with a stick and kim jong-un will yank the stick out once enough christians are inside



Yeah I figure they get rid of them the old fashioned way- arresting them on bogus espionage charges and disposing of them in a less outlandish manner. You know, rather than publically making them the dopest, most metal martyrs imaginable

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Kingfish
Oct 21, 2015


It is a brutal totalitarian state but it's not an irrational actor. Often its 'provocations' in reaction to American prodding.

byob historian
Nov 5, 2008

I'm an animal abusing piece of shit! I deliberately poisoned my dog to death and think it's funny! I'm an irredeemable sack of human shit!

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

I'm still weirded out that the North Koreans let a Confucianist cult have its own political party, and even lets them have seats in their parliament.

yeah why would they want chinese influence like that ?!?!

byob historian
Nov 5, 2008

I'm an animal abusing piece of shit! I deliberately poisoned my dog to death and think it's funny! I'm an irredeemable sack of human shit!

The Kingfish posted:

It is a brutal totalitarian state but it's not an irrational actor. Often its 'provocations' in reaction to American prodding.

lol its 2017 and you think there are still rational actors

good one!

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

General Dog posted:

Yeah I figure they get rid of them the old fashioned way- arresting them on bogus espionage charges and disposing of them in a less outlandish manner. You know, rather than publically making them the dopest, most metal martyrs imaginable

The North Koreans are so good at keeping secrets we don't even know they're genociding Christians, is your position.

byob historian
Nov 5, 2008

I'm an animal abusing piece of shit! I deliberately poisoned my dog to death and think it's funny! I'm an irredeemable sack of human shit!

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

The North Koreans are so good at keeping secrets we don't even know they're genociding Christians, is your position.

how else are all them north korean christains gonna be dead come resurrection day? trumps too weak to do anything about it!!!

mormonpartyboat
Jan 14, 2015

by Reene
:rip:

KIND OF A KIM DEAL
Oct 28, 2016

by zen death robot

PowerbalI posted:

Communism is fun!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFYFj5q8_Qk

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

The North Koreans are so good at keeping secrets we don't even know they're genociding Christians, is your position.

My position is that a few Christians have probably been killed, tough not explicitly for being Christian. And also probably not many, because how many can there be?

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

General Dog posted:

My position is that a few Christians have probably been killed, tough not explicitly for being Christian. And also probably not many, because how many can there be?

"Christians are treated like any other North Korean" just doesn't have the same dramatic quality as the steamroller story.

Who Is Paul Blart
Oct 22, 2010
DPRK is insanely good OP

gobbagool
Feb 5, 2016

by R. Guyovich
Doctor Rope

Who Is Paul Blart posted:

DPRK is insanely good OP

It has everything that village idiot who is Paul Blart likes

Fast Luck
Feb 2, 1988

Looks like they're good, it turns out,


https://www.thenation.com/article/this-is-whats-really-behind-north-koreas-nuclear-provocations/

quote:

Donald Trump was having dinner at Mar-a-Lago with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on February 11 when a message arrived mid-meal, courtesy of Pyongyang: North Korea had just tested a new, solid-fuel, intermediate-range ballistic missile, fired from a mobile—and therefore hard-to-detect—launcher. The president pulled out his 1990s flip-phone and discussed this event in front of the various people sitting within earshot. One of these diners, Richard DeAgazio, was suitably agog at the import of this weighty scene, posting the following comment on his Facebook page: “HOLY MOLY!!! It was fascinating to watch the flurry of activity at dinner when the news came that North Korea had launched a missile in the direction of Japan.”

Actually, this missile was aimed directly at Mar-a-Lago, figuratively speaking. It was a pointed nod to history that no American media outlet grasped: “Prime Minister Shinzo,” as Trump called him, is the grandson of Nobusuke Kishi, a former Japanese prime minister whom Abe reveres. Nobusuke was deemed a “Class A” war criminal by the US occupation authorities after World War II, and he ran munitions manufacturing in Manchuria in the 1930s, when Gen. Hideki Tojo was provost marshal there. Kim Il-sung, whom grandson Kim Jong-un likewise reveres, was fighting the Japanese at the same time and in the same place.

As I wrote for this magazine in January 2016, the North Koreans must be astonished to discover that US leaders never seem to grasp the import of their history-related provocations. Even more infuriating is Washington’s implacable refusal ever to investigate our 72-year history of conflict with the North; all of our media appear to live in an eternal present, with each new crisis treated as sui generis. Visiting Seoul in March, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson asserted that North Korea has a history of violating one agreement after another; in fact, President Bill Clinton got it to freeze its plutonium production for eight years (1994–2002) and, in October 2000, had indirectly worked out a deal to buy all of its medium- and long-range missiles. Clinton also signed an agreement with Gen. Jo Myong-rok stating that henceforth, neither country would bear “hostile intent” toward the other.

The Bush administration promptly ignored both agreements and set out to destroy the 1994 freeze. Bush’s invasion of Iraq is rightly seen as a world-historical catastrophe, but next in line would be placing North Korea in his “axis of evil” and, in September 2002, announcing his “preemptive” doctrine directed at Iraq and North Korea, among others. The simple fact is that Pyongyang would have no nuclear weapons if Clinton’s agreements had been sustained.

Now comes Donald Trump, blasting into a Beltway milieu where, in recent months, a bipartisan consensus has emerged based on the false assumption that all previous attempts to rein in the North’s nuclear program have failed, so it may be time to use force—to destroy its missiles or topple the regime. Last September, the centrist Council on Foreign Relations issued a report stating that “more assertive military and political actions” should be considered, “including those that directly threaten the existence of the [North Korean] regime.” Tillerson warned of preemptive action on his recent East Asia trip, and a former Obama-administration official, Antony Blinken, wrote in The New York Times that a “priority” for the Trump administration should be working with China and South Korea to “secure the North’s nuclear arsenal” in the event of “regime change.” But North Korea reportedly has some 15,000 underground facilities of a national-security nature. It is insane to imagine the Marines traipsing around the country in such a “search and secure” operation, and yet the Bush and Obama administrations had plans to do just that. Obama also ran a highly secret cyber-war against the North for years, seeking to infect and disrupt its missile program. If North Korea did that to us, it might well be considered an act of war.

On November 8, 2016, nearly 66 million voters for Hillary Clinton received a lesson in Hegel’s “cunning of history.” A bigger lesson awaits Donald Trump, should he attack North Korea. It has the fourth-largest army in the world, as many as 200,000 highly trained special forces, 10,000 artillery pieces in the mountains north of Seoul, mobile missiles that can hit all American military bases in the region (there are hundreds), and nuclear weapons more than twice as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb (according to a new estimate in a highly detailed Times study by David Sanger and William Broad).

Last October, I was at a forum in Seoul with Strobe Talbott, a former deputy secretary of state for Bill Clinton. Like everyone else, Talbott averred that North Korea might well be the top security problem for the next president. In my remarks, I mentioned Robert McNamara’s explanation, in Errol Morris’s excellent documentary The Fog of War, for our defeat in Vietnam: We never put ourselves in the shoes of the enemy and attempted to see the world as they did. Talbott then blurted, “It’s a grotesque regime!” There you have it: It’s our number-one problem, but so grotesque that there’s no point trying to understand Pyongyang’s point of view (or even that it might have some valid concerns). North Korea is the only country in the world to have been systematically blackmailed by US nuclear weapons going back to the 1950s, when hundreds of nukes were installed in South Korea. I have written much about this in these pages and in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Why on earth would Pyongyang not seek a nuclear deterrent? But this crucial background doesn’t enter mainstream American discourse. History doesn’t matter, until it does—when it rears up and smacks you in the face.

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016


meeting the head of state of another country? that's a nuking

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

the dprk withdrew from the non-proliferation treaty in the 90s and conducted multiple nuclear tests pre-president fatass but surely the missile test must be all america's fault, somehow

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

America invading and bombing multiple sovereign countries has nothing to do with it.

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977
love 2 support fascist military dictatorships that starve their population while generals live like kings

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

America invading and bombing multiple sovereign countries has nothing to do with it.

exactly, it's really because the president had golf with shinzo abe

- incisive analysis from the nation

Bro Dad
Mar 26, 2010


Ace of Baes posted:

love 2 support fascist military dictatorships that starve their population while generals live like kings

Viva Chavismo!

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Fallen Hamprince posted:

exactly, it's really because the president had golf with shinzo abe

- incisive analysis from the nation

A disingenuous reading from Hamprince? Well I never!

mormonpartyboat
Jan 14, 2015

by Reene

Ace of Baes posted:

love 2 support fascist military dictatorships that starve their population while generals live like kings

buy war bonds!!

Fallen Hamprince
Nov 12, 2016

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

A disingenuous reading from Hamprince? Well I never!

sorry i didnt put more effort into this dumbass piece of dprk apologism

quote:

Last October, I was at a forum in Seoul with Strobe Talbott, a former deputy secretary of state for Bill Clinton. Like everyone else, Talbott averred that North Korea might well be the top security problem for the next president. In my remarks, I mentioned Robert McNamara’s explanation, in Errol Morris’s excellent documentary The Fog of War, for our defeat in Vietnam: We never put ourselves in the shoes of the enemy and attempted to see the world as they did. Talbott then blurted, “It’s a grotesque regime!” There you have it: It’s our number-one problem, but so grotesque that there’s no point trying to understand Pyongyang’s point of view (or even that it might have some valid concerns). North Korea is the only country in the world to have been systematically blackmailed by US nuclear weapons going back to the 1950s, when hundreds of nukes were installed in South Korea. I have written much about this in these pages and in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Why on earth would Pyongyang not seek a nuclear deterrent? But this crucial background doesn’t enter mainstream American discourse. History doesn’t matter, until it does—when it rears up and smacks you in the face.

poor lil' nk, being 'systematically blackmailed' into... not invading south korea?

this is the left wing equivalent of those moronic thinkpieces after the election about how we really have to empathize with these handsome and well dressed white nationalists

Fallen Hamprince has issued a correction as of 07:56 on Mar 24, 2017

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Fallen Hamprince posted:

sorry i didnt put more effort into this dumbass piece of dprk apologism


poor lil' nk, being 'systematically blackmailed' into... not invading south korea?

this is the left wing equivalent of those moronic thinkpieces after the election about how we really have to empathize with these handsome and well dressed white nationalists

So really you're mad at this article for pointing out that North Korea has been threatened with nuclear weapons for over half a century, and that maybe that informs their decisions regarding their homebrew nuclear program.

Greg Legg
Oct 6, 2004

Fallen Hamprince posted:

sorry i didnt put more effort into this dumbass piece of dprk apologism


poor lil' nk, being 'systematically blackmailed' into... not invading south korea?

this is the left wing equivalent of those moronic thinkpieces after the election about how we really have to empathize with these handsome and well dressed white nationalists

You dumb dumb

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
What the DPRK actually wants is U.S. troops out of South Korea, left-wing nationalists in power in South Korea, and a peace treaty leading to a ROK-DPRK confederation. And there's a sizable constituency in South Korea that would probably go for it.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

We really are just wasting a lot of time and resources to make sure there's never any kind of reconciliation between the North and South. The ROK army is more than capable of defending their country without the constant deployment of American troops.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

We really are just wasting a lot of time and resources to make sure there's never any kind of reconciliation between the North and South. The ROK army is more than capable of defending their country without the constant deployment of American troops.
Yeah.

Also B.R. Myers pointed out in an interview this movie is popular in South Korea now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBGOM94PD4

Pretty interesting wunza movie if only for the setup. Wunza sexy North Korean investigator, and wunza bumbling South Korean detective. But together they go on crazy, hilarious adventures to take down a cross-border crime ring!

BrutalistMcDonalds has issued a correction as of 09:04 on Mar 24, 2017

freckle
Apr 6, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo

Wikkheiser posted:

Yeah.

Also B.R. Myers pointed out in an interview this movie is popular in South Korea now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBGOM94PD4

Pretty interesting wunza movie. Wunza sexy North Korean investigator, and wunza bumbling South Korean detective. But together they go on crazy, hilarious adventures to take down a cross-border crime ring!

this sounds like the third version of 'the bridge' i am now aware of.

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Wikkheiser posted:

Yeah.

Also B.R. Myers pointed out in an interview this movie is popular in South Korea now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSBGOM94PD4

Pretty interesting wunza movie if only for the setup. Wunza sexy North Korean investigator, and wunza bumbling South Korean detective. But together they go on crazy, hilarious adventures to take down a cross-border crime ring!

Tae Guk Gi was really good despite its cheesy setup, so maybe this is too.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkDwIkFNwnk

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Wikkheiser posted:

What the DPRK actually wants is U.S. troops out of South Korea, left-wing nationalists in power in South Korea, and a peace treaty leading to a ROK-DPRK confederation. And there's a sizable constituency in South Korea that would probably go for it.
North Korea is not lead by left-wing nationalists, it's a fascist state, it has the ethnic/racial bullshit built into it

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

rudatron posted:

North Korea is not lead by left-wing nationalists, it's a fascist state, it has the ethnic/racial bullshit built into it

I think you're misreading the post.

Besides, the North Koreans don't want to be on a war footing forever.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
The DPRK is on a feed-absurd-whims-of-the-tubby-manchild-Kim-Jong-Un footing, not a war footing

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

rudatron posted:

North Korea is not lead by left-wing nationalists, it's a fascist state, it has the ethnic/racial bullshit built into it
I didn't say that. I said North Korea wants left-wing nationalists in power in South Korea.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
Also I cribbed that from Myers here who also wrote that book on North Korea being a fascist state:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...the_regime.html

quote:

The goal of [North Korean] nuclear armament is not mere security from U.S. attack, which conventional weaponry trained on Seoul has preserved since 1953—and through far greater crises than George W. Bush’s little “axis of evil” remark in 2002. As every North Korean knows, the whole point of the military-first policy is “final victory,” or the unification of the peninsula under North Korean rule. Many foreign observers refuse to believe this, on the grounds that Kim Jong-un could not possibly want a nuclear war. They’re missing the whole point.

North Korea needs the capability to strike the U.S. with nuclear weapons in order to pressure both adversaries into signing peace treaties. This is the only grand bargain it has ever wanted. It has already made clear that a treaty with the South would require ending its ban on pro-North political agitation. The treaty with Washington would require the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the peninsula. The next step, as Pyongyang has often explained, would be some form of the North–South confederation it has advocated since 1960. One would have to be very naïve not to know what would happen next. As Kim Il-Sung told his Bulgarian counterpart Todor Zhivkov in 1973, “If they listen to us, and a confederation is established, South Korea will be done with.”

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Wikkheiser posted:

I didn't say that. I said North Korea wants left-wing nationalists in power in South Korea.
Is your assumption that left-wing guys are gonna be 'weak' and cave to north threats, or that they'll buy the bullshit juche rhetoric? Because either is kinda silly.

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer
if you defect to NK do they hook you up with nice stuff?

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

rudatron posted:

Is your assumption that left-wing guys are gonna be 'weak' and cave to north threats, or that they'll buy the bullshit juche rhetoric? Because either is kinda silly.

According to the direct quote that's the North Korean assumption, that the inherent superiority of Juche Thought will conquer the hearts and minds of the South and wipe it from the map under communist direction.

The South Korean Left wants reconciliation with the North, and an end to chaebol rule.

Jose posted:

if you defect to NK do they hook you up with nice stuff?

Yes. The new policy is that defectors get some money and featured on North Korean television. They've also extended this to double-defectors, which is why lately there's been a few people who have gone back to the North.

There's an American guy who defected to the North all the way back in the Korean War, and they've used him as a propaganda mouthpiece ever since. Gave him a wife, a decent apartment, and all the amenities. He even denies that the famine happened during the 90s, probably because they shielded him from it.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
But a confederation isn't going to go smoothly for the North, because it's the south has both the dominant economy and the better military - the north has simply shown itself more willing to put that military on display, but its army is only good 'on paper'.

So if the confederation goes on NK's terms, it'll be entirely because of pressure from China, not juche or whatever

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Brown Menace
Dec 24, 2010

Now comes in all colors.


In conclusion, DPRK good, juche even better

  • Locked thread