|
Eastern Entente, please.
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2017 12:23 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 03:00 |
|
wedgekree posted:I guess I'm sort of confused as to how logistically they could put so many men into the field in so narrow an area - you can't have a million+ soldiers by the logistics of an area in such a narrow front without massive issues from the men basically tripping over one another. They'd be running out of supplies and have massive coordination issues along such a narrow front particularly. Maybe that's why they're losing so many men whenever they engage. Or is that just 'cause they're attacking? My problem with the various AGEOD LPs I've seen is that the battle screens just tell me who lost the most men, not why. Maybe it's buried in tooltips somewhere.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 08:29 |
|
I think Kitchener split his force at some point, rather than losing like 800,000 men out of it.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 15:12 |
|
I don't get why Kitchener is always taking higher losses than forces he outnumbers ten-to-one. Is defense just that strong? Or is there something dragging him down about having such a vast force?
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 23:16 |
|
Wow. This is getting brutal. Sucks to be losing chunks of the Rheinland.
|
# ¿ May 21, 2017 19:33 |
|
Pockets don't seem to have been all that decisive so far. The allied troops in them have been dying nicely, but that's been the case everywhere, pocket or no pocket.
|
# ¿ May 30, 2017 20:42 |
|
Yeah, that was doubly-stupid because the whole point of the naval war in WW1 is that the British couldn't afford to cede control of the sea to Germany like that. The blockade of Germany was devastating in the long-run, and cutting off even some of Britain's trade would have had a similar effect on them, not to mention the political ramifications of a nation used to ruling the waves being beaten down that hard at sea.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2017 11:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 03:00 |
|
It does kinda feel like AGEOD is not great at this conflict, since it's all about stacks instead of frontlines.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2017 21:17 |