Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
SilvergunSuperman
Aug 7, 2010

Tato posted:

Highlander series is the greatest example of all of this because the first film is perfectly constructed to leave no room for a sequel. There are immortals, there can be only one, all of them fight and at the end only one is left and he has the prize. It ties a beautiful little bow on the whole thing and is indicative of a time when people cared about making a satisfying film more than sequel/franchising potential.

Each unnecessary sequel has to completely re-write the first film in an insane attempt to justify its existence, after which the NEXT sequel also ignores that one.


I love the reason for Sean Connery returning,

The director signed back on to do a sequel, and wanted to bring him back. They're like well he's dead, so he's like well then I'm out, so they said gently caress it and brought him back.

Awful movie, jesus.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread