Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Shaggar
Apr 26, 2006
Its what you expected. its bad cause lots of exposition cause general audiences are morons. parts of it look pretty good (esp scarjo's parts) but its in service of a big ol' boring mess so its bad. everythgin is bad other than Scarlett Johansson.

People are bitching about stealing scenes from the original or something but they look pretty good for the parts they steal. the problem is they only steal the climaxes to those scenes so its a mess. they do this because they need more time for exposition so it makes it double bad. If they had done a 100% shot for shot remake of the original it would probably be great.

but no they shoehorned in some dumbass Hollywood garbo-plot that sucks rear end and topped it all off with the worst most boringist bad guy in this era of bad boring bad guys

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread