|
CharlestheHammer posted:Is there something special about 78? I imagine the way their board us shaping up for the draft, they really have a hard on for 78 players and this is their way if getting one of those guys for someone they won't keep next year.
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 03:16 |
|
|
axeil posted:https://twitter.com/sbjsbd/status/849275666851876864 Godspeed Tony. Truly America's team. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:47
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I can't get over how dumb it is to trade away a legit shot as the best defensive line in football to turn a late 3rd round pick into a mid 3rd round pick. By typical NFL trade logic you can add a round for every year out a pick is. So if you buy into that you're trading a mid 3rd for a late 4th in 2017 pick value. I'm sure that helps a lot.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:52
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:By typical NFL trade logic you can add a round for every year out a pick is. So if you buy into that you're trading a mid 3rd for a late 4th in 2017 pick value. I have always found that logic inherently flawed. The value of the future pick should be based on the strength of the draft class. If I trade for a future second round pick and that class has 60 players projected to have a first round grade, is that pick really only worth a third?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:57
|
|
|
Top 10s and Top 100s are out and lame. Don't show me a YouTube video unless its the Top 78 Mark Sanchez moments
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:58
|
|
|
Spintzel posted:Top 10s and Top 100s are out and lame. Don't show me a YouTube video unless its the Top 78 Mark Sanchez moments *scrambles home to put together a video of Butt Fumble repeated 77 times followed by "Ugly! And a loss!"*
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:05
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Lol it's pretty clearly exactly a 78 player deep draft. 79 to the end is a waste. You think he would have stopped at like 80 to make it less blatant.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:06
|
|
|
i think this got missed: the next all or nothing (amazon hard knocks) covers the rams.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:12
|
|
|
hifi posted:i think this got missed: the next all or nothing (amazon hard knocks) covers the rams. Why can't they pick a team that isn't a literal ruin
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
He said Rams, not Niners.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
This makes no loving sense to me from the Ravens side but hey cool a good player for almost no cost.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
WHOOPS posted:It's this. The Ravens natural 3rd round pick is #78.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 23:32
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:Can ravens fans tell me if he'll ever play a snap? Stats say he's worth 5 sacks a year which honestly seems decent? hes a terrific young player, yeah he will play for you. unless he has that weird ex ravens magic that has killed art jones and pernell mcphee and a billion other dudes i guess
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
Ghost Dog posted:hes a terrific young player, yeah he will play for you. unless he has that weird ex ravens magic that has killed art jones and pernell mcphee and a billion other dudes i guess It isn't ex ravens magic that killed McPhee. It's ex knee cartilage or whatever the gently caress is wrong with him. When he is on the field, he's a boss.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
I was personally super glad when the Ravens let McPhee walk. He's a sack machine
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 23:59
|
|
|
Sataere posted:It isn't ex ravens magic that killed McPhee. It's ex knee cartilage or whatever the gently caress is wrong with him. When he is on the field, he's a boss. same with art jones and a ton of other ex ravens, which was my point. neither of those guys had any injury problems their entire time with the ravens and then they imploded. i don't think its anything special its just an odd coincidence that the ones they let walk into fa always tend to fail. kelechi osemele is good i guess. MY NIGGA D-LINK posted:I was personally super glad when the Ravens let McPhee walk. He's a sack machine he was rad as situational pass rusher his last year yeah. theyve consistently developed interior lineman(which is where mcphee started, idk what he played in chicago his last year for the ravens he was a hybrid) so they were fine with art jones/mcphee walking, along with a bunch of other dudes whose claim to fame was being the guy playing next to haloti ngata. its also probably why they were fine trading jernigan, they have a terrific young DT named michael pierce who had a great year on limited snaps.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:04
|
|
|
He actually had knee problems in Baltimore. One if the main reasons they let him walk was the fear that it'd be chronic, which was a good bet on their part. He is an OLB in our 3-4 and is still a sack machine four games a year. I hope he stays healthy this season, because he is a nasty player and fun as heck to watch.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
he missed 4 games his entire time here with a minor knee injury, and they let him walk cause they could not afford him. thats not really anything like what you are saying e:the most i can find is a minor knee injury from training camp in 2012. he actually missed the games from a thigh injury. Ghost Dog fucked around with this message at 00:18 on Apr 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Amazon Prime's taking over the CBS/NBC Thursday Night streams from twitter https://www.recode.net/2017/4/4/15184100/nfl-amazon-football-games-thursday-streaming-watch-live-prime-twitter
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
I remember pernell Mcphee had severe knee problems throughout his life but especially while playing for the Ravens. almost every day he would say something to the effect of, "my knee hurts so bad i don't even know what to. i guess it's fine though" and it wasn't
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:I remember pernell Mcphee had severe knee problems throughout his life but especially while playing for the Ravens. almost every day he would say something to the effect of, "my knee hurts so bad i don't even know what to. i guess it's fine though" and it wasn't dang e: the most i can find on this is a blurry picture of a tattoo on andy daltons left inner thigh that spells his name without an e Ghost Dog fucked around with this message at 00:46 on Apr 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
that picture is a lie
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I have always found that logic inherently flawed. The value of the future pick should be based on the strength of the draft class. If I trade for a future second round pick and that class has 60 players projected to have a first round grade, is that pick really only worth a third? Enh; it's partly flawed. Yes, theoretically a 1st-round pick should have the same value any year, but the uncertainty tied to next year's pick--both in terms of placement in the draft and the quality of players available--does make it *slightly* less desirable. Though if I were making those decisions, I'd probably dock it something like a third of a round in value rather than a full round.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 01:48
|
|
|
Vertical Lime posted:Amazon Prime's taking over the CBS/NBC Thursday Night streams from twitter BRING BACK THE FANTASY ANNOUNCERS
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
And then, you are the Rams GM who trades away tons of draft picks for Goff. Still early. But uhh he didn't look to good. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
A Man and his dog posted:And then, you are the Rams GM who trades away tons of draft picks for Goff.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:13
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:BRING BACK THE FANTASY ANNOUNCERS PLEASE. I almost died laughing because they roasted some garbage no name cornerback relentlessly for multiple drives
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:55
|
|
|
whypick1 posted:*scrambles home to put together a video of Butt Fumble repeated 77 times followed by "Ugly! And a loss!"*  This is my personal favorite.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 03:29
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:Enh; it's partly flawed. Yes, theoretically a 1st-round pick should have the same value any year, but the uncertainty tied to next year's pick--both in terms of placement in the draft and the quality of players available--does make it *slightly* less desirable. Though if I were making those decisions, I'd probably dock it something like a third of a round in value rather than a full round. I don't think it's that the value of the pick that diminishes, so much as the fear that you won't be around to use it drives GMs towards undervaluing them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
bobjr posted:
You'd think he'd leave well enough alone when the db was like "nah" but welp
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
This is so amazing http://boston.cbslocal.com/2017/04/04/tom-brady-super-bowl-jerseys-fbi-tip-iteam-exclusive/ When they make the Brady movie, this absolutely needs to be a major plot line or even a spin off.
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 12:05
|
|
|
bobjr posted:
andey is a better receiver and lover
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 12:07
|
|
|
John Brown posted:Guys...I'm really down about the way this all happened. These emotions may be premature but I'm really considering moving the Cowboys down a notch and finding a new #1 team to root for. Any suggestions? If you like great QB play then definitely the Broncos
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 13:11
|
|
|
AggressivelyStupid posted:andey is a better receiver and lover I mean, I guess if you're into that adorably slow and bumbly-type, which can be adorable. But if you want an aggressive manhorse, I'm sure that their other QB that fit the mold better than &e.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 14:43
|
|
|
FizFashizzle posted:BRING BACK THE FANTASY ANNOUNCERS Those Yahoo fantasy announcers were the best announcing team I've ever seen. More TV broadcasts should embrace a funnier, less old white man style commentary track.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 14:50
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I have always found that logic inherently flawed. The value of the future pick should be based on the strength of the draft class. If I trade for a future second round pick and that class has 60 players projected to have a first round grade, is that pick really only worth a third? The top 60 a year before the draft looks completely different than it does on draft day. It's a crapshoot to be like oh yeah the draft two years from now looks really deep.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
axeil posted:Those Yahoo fantasy announcers were the best announcing team I've ever seen. More TV broadcasts should embrace a funnier, less old white man style commentary track. Why do you think Bob Uecker is so awesome?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 15:04
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:The top 60 a year before the draft looks completely different than it does on draft day. It's a crapshoot to be like oh yeah the draft two years from now looks really deep. Plus, you also know way more about your team now than you do about your team next year, which further complicates things. Even if next year's draft is super-deep on Defensive Ends, you may not need one then.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 15:15
|
|
|
Also there's never going to be 60 'first round talents' in a draft. I could see it varying between 20-40 every year but I'd be shocked if there were ever that huge of a variance.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 03:16 |
|
|
The Big Jesus posted:Also there's never going to be 60 'first round talents' in a draft. I could see it varying between 20-40 every year but I'd be shocked if there were ever that huge of a variance. Well, suppose some new steroid hits the market that's even better than the gear current players are on. If there's a massive upgrade in, lets call it "sports nutrition," you could see a year or two where there is a huge difference between those on the new stuff vs not before it normalizes and everyone is on it or it's banned.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 15:23
|
|
