Otherkinsey Scale posted:I feel the need to link this interview. Though that might be the wrong phrasing.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2017 03:51 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 16:47 |
Pierson posted:My line for seperation of art and artist has always been "does buying this work benefit the person who made it or the people who share his ideology?" I refuse to buy anything by Orson Scott Card because I don't want any of my cash to go to that rear end in a top hat, but I'll sometimes get H.P. Lovecraft's old work because as far as I checked his estate are just regular people who had a terrible ancestor. Barnes and Noble had a real pretty hardcover of 'everything he wrote, pretty much' for $20. They don't do that if they had to pay anybody.
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2017 07:31 |
zoux posted:Folks there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. Some portion of every dollar you spend goes to some piece of poo poo somewhere.
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2017 16:33 |
zoux posted:Har har but fretting over whether buying a book you think you'd enjoy is going to somehow reward bad people is dumb.
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2017 17:07 |
zoux posted:No I'm saying that wringing your hands over whether to buy stuff that you like because the author, or publisher, or whatever might be a "bad person" is stupid. There's also always the secondary market. If I buy Ender's Game at the library book sale, that money goes to them, not Card!
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2017 01:22 |