|
Dual processor boards with 16c/32t processors. More cores. All of them!
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 04:05 |
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Oh, speaking of paste, remember that you may need to adjust your paste technique a bit, with how the die is. I prefer the Jayz method, myself
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 06:15
|
|
|
kirtar posted:Do we know the orientation of that? I'm assuming it's aligned with where we see gaps in the pins on the underside Look at the bottom right corner
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
SamDabbers posted:Ryzen owns for multitasking This picture pleases me
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 06:33
|
|
|
Drakhoran posted:Since we're linking to Videocardz.com, anyone feel like a 48 core "Starship" chip on 7nm next year? TRANSCODE ALL THE STREAMS
|
|
#
¿
May 11, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
Sormus posted:Not to rip on WCtech or whatever, but: "Amazingly, this CPU is only rated at 155W, 5 watts less than Intel’s upcoming Core i9-7920X 12 core flagship Skylake X CPU." 160/12 = 13.3w per core 155/16 = 9.68w per core Pretty decent difference in TDP, anyway. e: So it doesn't get lost in the last thread 
PerrineClostermann fucked around with this message at 16:37 on May 15, 2017 |
|
#
¿
May 15, 2017 16:24
|
|
|
The 1080 is not mid tier
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
Maybe in a rich man's world.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
It is at its launch price, yes. And I say that as someone who owns a water cooled 1070
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2017 05:24
|
|
|
...And a 300+ launch price is not mid-tier.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2017 05:46
|
|
|
Has GPU passthrough gotten good enough to play games in a Windows VM reliably? My friend keeps insisting it's still got bad bugs in general
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
eames posted:Oh god that list looks like their PR department is now registering random trademarks to generate "hype" AMD is the one who knocks
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 21:28
|
|
|
I look at my laptop with an Intel CPU and AMD GPU and laugh every time 
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 01:53
|
|
|
New Zealand can eat me posted:I miss those Just screenshot Firestrike!
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 03:53
|
|
|
Beautiful Ninja posted:A significant portion of that is bug fixing, Ryzen + Nvidia combos apparently performed extremely poorly in the game in DX12 pre-patch, far below what you'd expect compared to other games. There is some speculation that Nvidia's drivers don't handle Ryzen properly so I wonder if Nixxes worked around it or if it was a Rise of the Tomb Raider engine bug this whole time. There were some generic CPU related fixes as well that should have improved both Intel and AMD performance in this game with this patch as well. Didn't Adored do a whole thing on this problem a month ago?
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2017 19:07
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Flandre_1507/status/869663506743914497
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
Vega is a concept, an ideal we strive towards. There is no Vega, because Vega represents our yearnings and struggles toward the future. Vega is pure, and will forever be beyond reach.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 18:04
|
|
|
SourKraut posted:Then tell me why there's 18 hours of static?!?!?! It represents the fog and confusion of life, the aimlessness of our meanderings as we search for the way to Vega
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 20:11
|
|
|
Paul MaudDib posted:Take an 8-core Ryzen 7, put Windows into high-performance mode to force it to clock up, then look at your CPU utilization percent while you're at your desktop. That's how much load you'll see during a game. My background usage with chrome, discord, Skype, etc. Etc. On a 2600k is usually 20-30%. I have too many chrome tabs... On a fresh boot, it's usually 5-10%
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 16:52
|
|
|
Lockback posted:That is ridiculously high for no applications running, you might be a botnet. Right now with a 2500k running Chrome, a Webex meeting I am not paying attention to, Skype, and Outlook I am at 6%. Most of that is Webex. By "fresh boot" I mean "I just rebooted and started all the programs I use." SinineSiil posted:I feel something is very wrong with your computer. On my computer with Discord, Steam, Spotify and Chrome with lots of tabs running and nothing new loading I have 5-10% CPU usage. And while idling it has just 0-2% usage. I have an inordinate amount of chrome tabs, along with just a bunch of stuff running in the background, so I'm not particularly bothered. I have been meaning to do a fresh install though, just because this Windows install's been upgraded all the way from when W7 was the new hotness, and been across several drives...
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 18:33
|
|
|
Everyone has different computers!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 03:09
|
|
|
It's also a photoshop.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
SinineSiil posted:Are you sure? What, you think it's actually possible that there's a picture of "Threadripper II" and it's the size of a motherboard? Also I can tell from the pixels and having seen quite a few shops in my time 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 18:32
|
|
|
Twerk from Home posted:As they should be. The question isn't if Intel will react, but rather how much. So far, results aren't promising.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
If Intel really was pricing based on what the market will bear, and not as low as they can, and there's a large difference between those values, wouldn't Intel have been able to simply respond with lower pricing? They wouldn't necessarily have to design new chips to compete. Instead they're releasing x299, and they're not likely to engage in any price drops from their announced prices, right? That leads me to believe Intel can't price their products to push AMD out of any market share gains. What am I missing?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 17:17
|
|
|
At what point do we as outsiders say "Intel can't" instead of "Intel won't"? And does it make much of a difference either way if the end result is high prices on a platform that doesn't make sense?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 18:07
|
|
|
Fair enough, I suppose. It'll be interesting to see how everything pans out either way.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 18:34
|
|
|
Two computer semi-illiterate friends have Zen systems and have reported no problems.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 07:17
|
|
|
SwissArmyDruid posted:Trump won't pay them for their work, and AMD will be dead for reals. AMD's design also builds the wall, they win by default.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2017 22:06
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/xNAMxZgvves
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
Feed the cube
|
|
#
¿
Jun 27, 2017 17:13
|
|
|
Scarecow posted:I'll rip and tear anyone who thinks threadripper isnt loving kicking rad 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
They pronounce it RyeZen in their videos.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 30, 2017 12:19
|
|
|
I have the sudden desire for a 2x200mm radiator.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
Twerk from Home posted:Well, or moderate discounting. That would also solve the problem completely. Gotta make back all that wasted mobile money
|
|
#
¿
Jul 12, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
How did Intel respond to accusations of just gluing a CPU into a socket?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2017 12:46
|
|
|
But I want to build a custom loop!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jul 24, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
Just give me a white PCB with white slots and I'll be happy.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2017 08:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 04:05 |
|
|
Measly Twerp posted:I wasn't aware of much of this: TheCoach posted:Yeah I always sorta knew intel did shady poo poo in mid 2000s or some poo poo but MAN is this nuts. Christ tell me about it. I knew they did some poo poo, but not on this long and pervasive a level.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2017 22:48
|
|