|
Un sets are horrible, but I do respect one deck my buddy made that forced you to either concede or drive to the store to buy him a drink.
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 09:24 |
|
|
Maybe Unstable will be the only place to get Pro Tour Player Cards.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
WarEternal posted:So what are the chances of this new MTG game announcement coming in September being them finally making their digital offering not-garbage? I've been wanting to play some Magic again since forever, but I can't really make time for paper and dislike MTGO. It's going to suck. There has never been a good Magic digital product. Even gatherer's comment section has been broken for 5+ years. Anyone remember the official deck builder/life counter for your phone that would crash and not save any of your changes if you got a call while using it?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
I started MTGO again, and in my very first sealed tournament, I accidentally figured out that you can add basic lands to your deck and send them all to your sideboard. So your entire sealed deck is a 5 color deck of your choosing between rounds. Is this known? It has to be.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Quad sleeving seems like it opens up for a lot of cheating with all of the ways you can slightly manipulate orientation and such.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
I like that these gods all have activated abilities that sync so perfectly with their triggered abilities.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
Entropic posted:Turns out something Magical happened and it's fine now. Please no more slivers ever. They were cool once, but they pushed that poo poo to to edge. Each sliver has "2: each sliver has '1: each sliver is a library'"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2017 04:22
|
|
|
BizarroAzrael posted:Here is a real card that is real. I wish it was real. Oh, wait. Still wouldn't stop fetch lands. 4 color decks forever.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
MTGO ended a game I was in, and added two losses that never happened to my league record.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
odiv posted:Hm, how does Magic deal with "an opponent's choice" in multiplayer games? Whoever controls the effect chooses the opponent to make the choice.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2017 22:31
|
|
|
Tainen posted:Just remembered that tomorrow Magic Digital Next should be revealed. I was wondering about that once esports was mentioned. Something that can actually make visual sense to a spectator? lol, I know it won't be anything good or fun or functioning.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Count Bleck posted:Is this digital next because??? God, I hope so.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2017 18:26
|
|
|
gif Probst posted:would a 1/1 with Prowess and Trample for R be broken? I'd say yes.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 20, 2017 01:55
|
|
|
There is no excuse for the shortness of this video. How do you not try changing your opponent's time and actually seeing if it takes?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 21, 2017 17:06
|
|
|
LordAbaddon posted:I still don't get why they got rid of it Compulsive need to change the rules every year and confuse my casual playing friends.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
That's insanely good.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 4, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:What are some big cards that creature stops? Fatal Push?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 4, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
Tainen posted:
I like it. I don't think that downside would ever stop me from putting this in a deck.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 03:28
|
|
|
Kuiperdolin posted:Where is the exiled card coming back? Between this and Hostage Taker, their templating sure is getting lazy this set.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 22:55
|
|
|
Angry Grimace posted:It's not an issue, the way "until" is worded and interpreted it always returns to where it was exiled from. Ok. I was just using Tidehollow Sculler as a reference. Didn't know that being able to return to hand was explicit in the rules.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 23:12
|
|
|
Entropic posted:Since Banisher Priest they've moved away from the "two separate triggers" templating model in favour of "until" which puts things back where they came from when the condition ends. Mostly to avoid having to explain how the stack works to new players when someone pulls the "blink my o-ring in response to the ETB trigger" trick. Ok. That makes sense. I had a faceless butcher deck back in the day that pulled the same trick, and the rules debate was a pain. I've been playing magic since before and after the template change, but I never had reason to notice it until today.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 5, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
I want "Terrible" to be a keyword.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 00:33
|
|
|
Excited for Opt.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 15:58
|
|
|
"I'll just search my library for a dinosaur card. No, Deathmist Raptor is a dinosaur. They changed it. No, it's not a dinosaur because of the picture, the picture doesn't mean anything. They changed it. It's a dinosaur now. Hold on, let me get the link."
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 16:36
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:there's a difference between not knowing how the rules work, and not knowing they changed the card type to something it doesn't say, just to make the current set appeal slightly more to edh players for a short period of time Exactly. Any player who isn't paying attention to the Ixalan release isn't going to know these changes. Someone even taking half a year off of the game might have an incredibly annoying game interaction because of this.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Like when Lord of Atlantis got buffed by another Lord of Atlantis, right? I'm assuming most people don't want to have to look up every old card in gatherer as they come across them.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 6, 2017 17:36
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:I can't put my finger on it, but the more I see of Ixalan, the more it seems like a bygone era of magic in regards to art and card design (in a good way). Maybe it's because the swashbuckling pirate aesthetic reminds me of the Weatherlight or Mercadia; maybe it's because the treasure theme feels like a funny gimmick along the lines of homarids and thrulls, only done well. In any case, it's been a while since I've felt this way. I kind of feel the same way, and I think it's because every other card doesn't have "graveyard" or "exile" on it. Like it's a "battlefield matters" set.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2017 07:42
|
|
|
I hate what I'm seeing, but I just started watching now. Have they shown any deck building? Can I actually build decks with multiple copies of mythics or rares?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2017 21:15
|
|
|
I'd have to assume there is some type of crafting in the game. Otherwise, people won't buy packs after they've opened a certain number because the duplicates will be useless. I doubt you'll be able to pick the card you craft into, but there has to be some way to make sure you don't end up with useless cards.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
Good. It's a terrible, clunky rule. I wish they wouldn't errata cards though. Just print new burn spells that say "Target player or planeswalker."
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:its not hard to remember that any burn spell printed before 2018 that says "opponent" means "opponent or planeswalker" It kind of is. If we're looking at a future where a burn spell that says "Deal 3 damage to target player." then we are looking at a future where they have opened design space by being able to create burn cards that only target players without targeting planeswalkers. We should not have to look up the year a card was printed to distinguish the difference. Best to leave Lava Axe targeting only players and printing Lava Axe 2 that targets players or planeswalkers.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 18:15
|
|
|
evilweasel posted:yeah but since every card has a year printed on it, knowing the date of the change makes it as easy as it can be So you want a card that says this: "Deal 3 damage to target player. This spell may not target a planeswalker." Rinkles posted:If there's an unwritten rule to never print cards that only target a player (not PW), I don't think it would be that big a deal. I think part of the point of this is to open design space so that they can print cards that only target a player. The Human Crouton fucked around with this message at 18:22 on Sep 8, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 18:20
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:I don't think so. It's to eliminate a clunky, esoteric rule. I do hate the rule, and have always thought it was very poorly implemented. I don't see a reason for changing it though unless they are going to do something with the change. Changing it for the sake of changing it doesn't make anyone's life easier at this point.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
Wouldn't "any target" mean you can cast the card at anything even if the effect wouldn't do anything? So if I wanted to bolt a land just because I wanted to cast bolt for some reason, I could. It just wouldn't do anything.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Aranan posted:I don't know anything about modern, but I'm tempted to dip my toes into it for some constructed Magic. Is there a rundown of the common decks in the format somewhere? https://www.mtggoldfish.com/metagame/modern#paper
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
Are people really holding onto Opts in the hopes that it will spike?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 11, 2017 21:55
|
|
|
I find the name adorable.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2017 04:18
|
|
|
Trilobites should be a tribe that generates endless amounts of themselves and then all die at once.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 02:30
|
|
|
Dinosaurs seem aimed for limited. I have a 30% win, just for fun, Naya modern deck I might add them to; but that's about it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 09:24 |
|
|
mcmagic posted:Ripjaw Raptor will land alot of places. It's just Dinos.dec that is bad. I agree with that.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2017 06:29
|
|