|
The moment you mention in your spoiler is definitely intended to be funny, it's just that the movie does an incredible job of transitioning from slapstick hijinks to pitch-black discomfort comedy as it goes on. What especially rules is that it leans pretty heavily on visual gags delivered through fairly long, fairly static takes in both modes, making the transition seamless in a way where it can often take a few moments to realize exactly what kind of laughter is going on The only other Vigolando I've seen is Parallel Monsters, which manages a few similarly stellar dark visual gags even though it's much shorter and a weaker movie on the whole. Is he always this on point as far as comedic craft?
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 10:43 |
|
|
Yeah to be honest it took me until this year to realize that Timecrimes and Timecop were different movies
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 01:15
|
|
|
I think the part that rules most is his brief throwaway line of sympathy toward Dan Stevens, confirming that the movie's biggest sin in his eyes was pulling Stevens away from his proper home in middlebrow period fiction
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2017 06:02
|
|