|
Coal releases more radiation and is therefore better
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 11:27 |
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:i trust the workers, but not capital haha you think their record is perfect
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Dude's right, aside from Thresher there's literally no record of even a minor nuclear accident happening in the US Navy. They are really drat good at nuclear power. For that matter, if you exclude the Soviets/Russians the safety record in Naval projects generally is fantastic I was in the navy nuclear program from 02 - 08
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Honestly if you know otherwise I'd be interested in hearing I'm actually unsure what about my service I had to sign a paper saying I wouldn't talk about so I actually immediately regretted making that comment
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 23:24
|
|
|
Nuclear power is...good?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 25, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
better stop eating bananas too
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 17:28
|
|
|
lotsa potassium in bananas, let me tell you
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 17:29
|
|
|
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/chart/ cool interactive chart with nuclide decay types and half-lives, btw
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 17:31
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Did you know that the longer the half-life the less dangerous a material is? When people talk about nuclear waste with a half-life of millions of years that means it has like 1 fission a year per kilogram. Sure, if we are looking at acute dosage but we also need to consider exposure time. 1 fission per year per kg sounds extremely low, but have a large quantity of that material and a long enough exposure, somatic exposure goes up. Granted, most of the public just hears half-life and thinks it is a bad thing. We still need to consider decay length in picking good storage sites.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:this would be cool if i was a big brain smart guy that knew what any of this meant it will tell you all of the known isotopes of an element, what its half-life is, and what type of decay it undergoes, the layout of the chart allows you to trace a decay line
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
rudatron posted:Not gonna name names, but it sounds like someone has electrophobia, and by someone I of course mean crazy cloud
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:i hope to die at the ripe age of 99 when an electric truck carrying organic fair trade coffee strikes me during my afternoon stroll Not a bad death bah
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
mister magpie posted:Not a bad death bah Eco friendly and fair trade. Niiice late stage death
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 00:18
|
|
|
Fukushima and Chernobyl are both really long lists of Goofus dont's over Gallant do's
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
whomupclicklike posted:This too, thank you. I think nuclear energy is good now 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 03:35
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:Actual bad ideas for nuclear power: I love all of this stuff.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 28, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
Nuke plants more like puke plants
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Lamebot posted:love the groundwater contamination potential Just do it under a reservation
|
|
#
¿
Apr 29, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:living underground changes an organism. just look at baloogan. the morlocks all descended from someone
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2017 22:39
|
|
|
I was at a show and some guys said I looked like a dude in a band. asked me about myself. asked about NUCLEAR POWER when I mentioned my old job. it's amazing how much NUCLEAR POWER knowledge you can remember while high.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
Nebakenezzer posted:And you won't risk breaking national security for the amusement of several random strangers ITT :sulks: I didn't mentioned classified stuff. just how it works. any fool can look it up.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
hot rock make steam boat go
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 01:32
|
|
|
it's still melting down
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
crazy cloud posted:ddon't sign my posts lol
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2017 06:07
|
|
|
cancer owns but I'm a gemini
|
|
#
¿
May 28, 2017 22:07
|
|
|
LinYutang posted:great news for nuclear power fans! amazed it took this long since i assumed any increase in radiation would ofc raise cancer rates
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 18:38
|
|
|
Fullhouse posted:lol that was 40 years ago coal plant exhaust
|
|
#
¿
Jun 1, 2017 18:58
|
|
|
Irradiation posted:
lol
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 07:09
|
|
|
Irradiation posted:From the actual article: nucular succ zone
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 07:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 11:27 |
|
|
somatic exposure doesn't increase cancer rates, who knew?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 07:19
|
|