|
Nuclear power isn't really economically feasible in the mega long term time horizon needed for a utility to recoup billions of dollars to build one in the US. Not unless they get way cheaper to build, a large part of which generally means loosening regulation. And most people/politicians are usually in favor of regulations for nuclear power.
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2017 21:46 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 14:10 |
|
financially racist posted:short term, nuclear is like the only way we can possibly avoid massive catastrophes related to climate change Someone said this above but there literally is no 'short term' for nuclear power in the US. Some benevolent dictator could take control tomorrow and decree that we are going to build 300GW of nuclear capacity and it wouldn't begin to make an impact until like maybe 2030.
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2017 17:55 |