|
kernel as in the thing u find in your poops
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 14:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:what the gently caress am i even looking at here the computer that starts the computer
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
akadajet posted:nothing quite says "gently caress you" on github like "poettering locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Dec 2, 2016" and then never seeing any movement on the issue ever again. hmm? why would you be annoyed by a person that types like this? Did you know that under pedantic constraints that I am technically correct? Perhaps you could like if I asked you rhetorical question instead of plainly stating something?
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
gently caress systemd.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 22:59
|
|
|
OWLS! posted:gently caress systemd. id love to gently caress and cum inside systemd for being so cool & good
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
mishaq posted:id love to gently caress and cum inside systemd for being so cool & good loving lewd.
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:21
|
|
|
heck. I'm gonna install netbsd in a bum today
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
phone autocorrectedVM to bum. will not fix
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
yuo ruined it
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:heck. I'm gonna install netbsd in a bum today the installer has yospos color options
|
|
#
?
May 1, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
mishaq posted:id love to gently caress and cum inside systemd for being so cool & good sick, u need to release your jizz in a more healthy way
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 09:05
|
|
|
systemd owns gentoo with systemd owns
|
|
#
?
May 2, 2017 09:21
|
|
|
no but seriously can someone explain why some people have problems w/ systemd
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:10
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:no but seriously can someone explain why some people have problems w/ systemd the 'tism
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:35
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:heck. I'm gonna install netbsd in a bum today
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:no but seriously can someone explain why some people have problems w/ systemd
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
i had a roommate who ran gentoo in college. huge. loving. nerd.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 02:50
|
|
|
i installed openbsd today, it's pretty cool
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
unix is cool & good thanks bell labs
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfdnFOiXUU
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:27
|
|
|
Unix be like - every program should do one thing well - but otoh the process model doesn't allow these particular things to be delegated in a reliable way - ~fartzz~
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:Unix be like unix powers the world my friend thank you boys in new providence, nj! sad youre dead and gay just like these forums 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 03:47
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:no but seriously can someone explain why some people have problems w/ systemd if stuff just works, what are they going to pretend to be working on all day
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:hmm? why would you be annoyed by a person that types like this? Did you know that under pedantic constraints that I am technically correct? Perhaps you could like if I asked you rhetorical question instead of plainly stating something?
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 06:11
|
|
|
not knowing much about systemd, it always sounded like a classic runaway project like, problem: init.d scripts suck, are poorly maintained, are written in shell script. systemd solution: reimplement all of those scripts from scratch, and also every single system facility that those scripts might be interested in (up to and including rewriting half the os network stack), building it all into one monolithic component it's one of those things where you look up and figure out what exactly the programmers have been doing for the last five years and you look back at their claimed reasons for doing it and you just nod your head sagely because it's pretty loving clear who's running the asylum these days
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 06:46
|
|
|
rjmccall posted:not knowing much about systemd, it always sounded like a classic runaway project SystemD did not remake everything as "one monolithic component". It remade a lot of things as still separate things that work together under a manageable and maintainable standard. Previously all those system facilities were all duck taped together, mostly by distro maintainers, and it is a miracle they worked at all. Also, saying the network stack was rewritten at all is not really true. The actual "network stack" is in the kernel and wasn't touched by the SystemD project as far as I know. SystemD just has a new tool for managing and configuring network interfaces. As bad as it can turn out most of the time, sometimes it is worth it to remake things from scratch. Needs and expectations for a platform can change and you can only keep hacking on a pile of hacks for so long before managing and maintaining it becomes a bigger liability than replacing it. In the general use cases we have now system services aren't there for their own sake to be used individually anyway, they aren't why people use *nix. They are just there to collectively support other applications so it makes sense to manage them collectively so they can be a consistent platform for those applications. Among all the craziness that does propagate through the open source community it is ironic one of the more sane and practical changes became a source of such toxic hostility. Although I suppose the biggest irony is that it could be argued the previous init system of infinitely nested bash scripts was way more monolithic in how it actually functioned. Despite being spread across multiple random file paths a lot of them them end up running together under one execution of bash.
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 08:19
|
|
|
motehr fuckin trap spring jesus
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 09:08
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:motehr fuckin trap spring jesus shut up
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 13:56
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:motehr fuckin trap spring jesus lol
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 14:29
|
|
|
NeoHentaiMaster posted:SystemD did not remake everything as "one monolithic component". It remade a lot of things as still separate things that work together under a manageable and maintainable standard. Previously all those system facilities were all duck taped together, mostly by distro maintainers, and it is a miracle they worked at all. Also, saying the network stack was rewritten at all is not really true. The actual "network stack" is in the kernel and wasn't touched by the SystemD project as far as I know. SystemD just has a new tool for managing and configuring network interfaces. shut up bitch
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
NeoHentaiMaster posted:SystemD did not remake everything as "one monolithic component". It remade a lot of things as still separate things that work together under a manageable and maintainable standard. Previously all those system facilities were all duck taped together, mostly by distro maintainers, and it is a miracle they worked at all. Also, saying the network stack was rewritten at all is not really true. The actual "network stack" is in the kernel and wasn't touched by the SystemD project as far as I know. SystemD just has a new tool for managing and configuring network interfaces. stopped reading after the first word, where you capitalized systemd incorrectly
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 15:11
|
|
|
no please i want to understand about system dick
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
BONGHITZ posted:no please i want to understand about system dick system dick stallman
|
|
#
?
May 4, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
bumping this thread to remind everyone that systemd is actually good
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 18:51
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:bumping this thread to remind everyone that systemd is actually good 
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:bumping this thread to remind everyone that systemd is actually good i don't use linux so i don't care
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
akadajet posted:i don't use linux so i don't care everyone uses linux my friend, it powers the internet
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
its bad
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
actually,
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 02:02 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 02:21
|
|