|
Without comment: https://twitter.com/NeumannNFL/status/866743649379471363
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/TheRealTesch/status/866880225564540928 STUD👏FELD👏
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 06:02
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Without comment: https://twitter.com/pff_jeff/status/804009964796682240 e. that was before the end of the season. He finished the season at 4 drops on 45 targets for an 8.9% rating, but also that is low enough volume that the percentage number isn't very significant. He caught 53.3% of his targets, but we also have to take that number with a big spoonfull of salt because of who was throwing to him and those dude's terrible accuracy. https://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/drops/2016/ Brandon Bolden's drop rate was 50% e.2 Demetrius Harris, TE KC caught 17 passes on 31 targets, and dropped six, for a drop rate of 19.4%. Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 19:34 on May 23, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:https://twitter.com/pff_jeff/status/804009964796682240 https://twitter.com/NeumannNFL/status/866752808946728961
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
Also I just noticed #2 on that list god bless
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
I was going to say something about Larry Donnell having a 100% drop rate but then I saw the 75 minimum and also lol if you ever rostered him in fantasy.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Vance McDonald can block too though. I know the rumor was that the niners were shopping him during the draft, but now I'm not sure what Shanahan is gonna do with him.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:48
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Vance McDonald can block too though. I know the rumor was that the niners were shopping him during the draft, but now I'm not sure what Shanahan is gonna do with him. Hes bad at catching footballs. Really bad. Really, really bad.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure you said something nice about him in last year's thread
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:I'm pretty sure you said something nice about him in last year's thread I said if he's fixed his drop issues (which he seemed to be doing last preseason) I'm was on board. He hasn't. He's bad. I also did a whole effort post about how he can only catch a ball when he sits in a zone and then he falls over. In man he constantly braces for impact which is why he has trouble with drops.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
Rotopass doesn't have a discount code this year, right?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 13:24
|
|
|
on topic:Footballguys posted:SF - TE Vance McDonald could be cut
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Rotopass doesn't have a discount code this year, right? Was wondering the same thing. Worried i might have to listen to a Bachelorette podcast to find out.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 01:00
|
|
|
In what circumstances would you consider Mitch Trubisky to be draftable?
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
In a 32 man dynasty league. Or deep 16 man dynasty league. Or 1.01 of a 10 man league because technically he is draftable anytime.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 18:16
|
|
|
Ben Nevis posted:In what circumstances would you consider Mitch Trubisky to be draftable? Somewhere in the late 2nd to late 3rd in a typical offense-only 12 team dynasty with like 20-30 roster spots is reasonable. In 2 QB or superflex, late 1st is reasonable, though he's gone as high as 5 in some of mine. In redraft, not.
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
RVProfootballer posted:Somewhere in the late 2nd to late 3rd in a typical offense-only 12 team dynasty with like 20-30 roster spots is reasonable. In 2 QB or superflex, late 1st is reasonable, though he's gone as high as 5 in some of mine. In redraft, not. I think a case could be made for early second in 12 man dynasty. That he's gone fifth in some drafts already is crazy.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 14:56
|
|
|
Sataere posted:I think a case could be made for early second in 12 man dynasty. That he's gone fifth in some drafts already is crazy. Superflex draft, to be fair. Watson has gone pick 1 in like 2/6 of those drafts that I've been in, fwiw. QB desperate teams are going to be desperate. Usually all three of Watson, Trubisky, and Mahomes have been gone by like pick 12 or 13 at the latest, it's just more often Watson is like pick 5-7, then Trub and Mahomes like 10-12. Edit: It wouldn't take much for them to return value at those ADPs, I don't think. Wentz seems to be fetching an early/mid 1st after his mediocre year, and Goff has crept back up into late 1st territory after his awful year, on account of the change in staff for the Rams and slight positive buzz about him improving. Garoppolo can probably fetch a 2nd right now, Osweiler was worth at least a 1st after Houston paid him, etc. I can't fault people drafting QBs so early too much, because there's just always a market for them in 12 team 2 QB. Half the league is not totally content with their QB situation. sourdough fucked around with this message at 16:07 on May 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
Do you guys set rookie salaries by draft position in your dynasty leagues? In my league I'm sure there's some teams desperate for QBs, but I suspect nobody wants to be paying Trubisky like 20$ in cap space in year 1, either.
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 18:22
|
|
|
Leperflesh posted:Do you guys set rookie salaries by draft position in your dynasty leagues? If you have salaries, isn't it an auction?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 20:26
|
|
|
Sataere posted:If you have salaries, isn't it an auction? We do FAAB all year, and held an auction for the initial startup draft. But our rookie/free agent draft isn't: we award good draft position for the first couple rounds according to placement in the previous year: The first, second, third, and fourth-place teams, and the consolation bracket winner, are seeded into the last five slots of the draft, in reverse order of standings. From the remaining teams, the four teams that scored the lowest amount of points through the regular season are randomly seeded into the first four draft picks. The remaining three teams are randomly seeded into the three remaining slots. We run non-snake for the first two rounds in that order, and then switch to snake. We set rookie salaries as so: The first four picks in the first round are paid $20 The fifth through eighth picks are paid $18 The ninth through twelfth picks are paid $16 All players drafted in the second round are paid $8 All players drafted in the third round are paid $4 All players drafted in the fourth round are paid $2 All remaining drafted players (fifth and later rounds) are paid $1 And each team has 100 FAAB dollars for the year, and a salary cap of $250. e. startup draft, everyone had $200 for bidding with, and all owned players' salaries go up by the greater of 10% or $1 each summer, so most teams are near their cap. Leperflesh fucked around with this message at 20:37 on May 26, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
So if you bid $25 FAAB on a player, do they cost $25(+10%) to keep next year?
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
Mitchell Trubisky is going to be trash
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Benne posted:Mitchell Trubisky is going to be trash Mitch Trubisky is going to be the greatest quarterback in Bears history.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Benne posted:Mitchell Trubisky is going to be trash Absolutely
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Benne posted:Mitchell Trubisky is going to be trash   
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Benne posted:Mitchell Trubisky is going to be trash This seems probable.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 01:43
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Mitch Trubisky is going to be the greatest quarterback in Bears history.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Mitch Trubisky is going to be the greatest quarterback in Bears history. Yeah that's what benne said
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
Fork of Unknown Origins posted:Yeah that's what benne said I just wanted to make sure I was being clear.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 07:39
|
|
|
Sataere posted:Mitch Trubisky is going to be the greatest quarterback in Bears history. How soon we forget Cade McNown.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 14:13
|
|
|
RCarr posted:So if you bid $25 FAAB on a player, do they cost $25(+10%) to keep next year? Yeah, $28 against your cap space the next year. So having a high pick in the rookie draft is a mixed bag; there needs to be a player worth the cap space to draft. But we allow trades of players and picks, so if you have an early pick you don't want, you aren't forced to make cap space for it, someone is gonna want that pick. So far it seems to be a good system, but we might have to institute a maximum contract length because for example David Johnson was picked up for a dollar and unless the owner is forced to drop him, he'll be an insane bargain for the entirety of his career.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
What does Matt Asiata's signing mean for Zach Zenner's dynasty value, my column (warning, LONG):
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:What does Matt Asiata's signing mean for Zach Zenner's dynasty value, my column (warning, LONG): Let me save you some trouble. Same value as Josh Gordon.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:43
|
|
|
 But people love Zenner more than they should love any 3rd-4th string RB because he ran over a bunch of future used car salesmen two years ago
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:48
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:
Yeah, I got the joke. But I also have Zack Zenner and Josh Gordon on my dynasty roster.  Why yes, I was in last place last year. How did you guess?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 18:59
|
|
|
If you can't find it in your hearts to love a SPARQ-y white runningback with a double-Z name, then I don't know why you even play this game.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:34
|
|
|
Bonus points for the Lions from going all the way from AA to ZZ.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:36
|
|
|
VietCampo posted:Bonus points for the Lions from going all the way from AA to ZZ. Yeah its pretty Riddickulous
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 19:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 04:55 |
|
|
I'm joining my first salary cap league and I can find quite a bit of advice on them in general but there's one wrinkle in the (for now proposed) rules that is throwing a wrench in my planning for the start up auction. They're talking about going by total contract value instead of just regular bidding. So for example, if I bid $10 for 2 years on a guy and someone else offered $6 for 4 years they would win. I don't really like this, but if that's how it goes down are there any articles/podcasts/etc that deal with specifically that set up? I don't know if I'm just googling the wrong thing but I can't find anything. My gut feeling is that to get anybody good you're going to have to throw four year contracts at them, and the idea of throwing a four year contract at a RB (besides one or two top top tier guys) sounds awful. I'll probably have to resign myself to not getting any big names for the first couple years and hopefully being able to trade people who made stupid contracts in the next couple years. A long time to wait though.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2017 20:15
|
|