|
Dead Reckoning posted:Out of the IRR, so go hogwild, Donnie, it's not my problem any more. Waste fraud and abuse is everyone's problem!
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 04:53 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 20:34 |
|
Duzzy Funlop posted:In Flagstaff current events, the trial for the kid that shot four folks and killed one on campus in the Fall of 2015 is looking to be headed for a hung jury. Whoa buddy, this is the country where O.J. got off, soaybe you could set the bar a little lower for your legal expectations. You keep mouthing off like that and we won't let your kind work here! Kawasaki Nun fucked around with this message at 21:46 on May 2, 2017 |
# ¿ May 2, 2017 21:08 |
|
facialimpediment posted:Colgate University (New York State) went on active shooter lockdown yesterday. It's the feel-good school shooting story of the year
|
# ¿ May 2, 2017 21:46 |
|
Are blue checks noting defeated pledges? or like that they have started to try and get them passed? seems like alot of check marks on there...
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 00:06 |
|
McNally posted:Please fill in the blank with something plausible, based on prior evidence of Bannon's goals. A scary bogeyman for voters to usher in successful midterm elections?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 00:42 |
|
ded posted:If you have had that happen to you, yes it was illegal. If you work OT you get OT pay, period. It doesn't matter what they say if you work it they owe you. Employers will try to pull all kinds of things that are not actually legal and try to say they are. I'm pretty sure different states have different regulations on how paid time off is regulated with regards to the proportion of the time's value your employer has to pay you. Depending on how that federal law is written you might only end up getting 70% or so of the value of your time if you cash it in at the end of the year, instead of the 150% you're currently entitled to.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 05:05 |
|
What is there to be afraid of? Disney movies only being available for digital download on itunes or something?
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 06:54 |
|
Nostalgia4Butts posted:
regulate what aspect of it? Seems like there would probably be a pretty lengthy investigation into potential conflicts before an acquisition like that would be approved, which stands as a pretty serious barrier to it being attempted. I'm aware that both companies are pretty huge with numerous subsidiaries and holdings, but so what? Any acquisition like this seems like a much bigger deal for stock holders than consumers. It just doesn't seem like a big deal to me. I doubt at any point the regulatory agencies of the federal government will simply throw their hands in the air and say "this is too hard", and it seems to me like Trump's ego wouldn't want to enable the formation of a company that would diminish his relative prestige, unless he had significant investment in it.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 17:27 |
|
bird food bathtub posted:Now I'm curious what percent of stuff like design, engineering, man power and overall resources goes into not letting your own military members kill themselves through incompetence instead of the enemy. For training exercises it sure felt North of 50%. I'm pretty sure it's the design concept that underscores every navy vessel design since sailors became a thing
|
# ¿ May 3, 2017 19:00 |
|
Buca di Bepis posted:My GF has diabetes and isn't rich, the Republican healthcare bill is basically telling her "gently caress you, please die horribly". Well once they're all dead(minus your girlfriend) then we can safely say that the system has worked.
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 01:21 |
|
CHICKEN SHOES posted:gently caress she suuuuuucks St.Huckabee of the deep desires more manflesh
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 20:46 |
|
bird food bathtub posted:Sure would be neat to get out of the darkest timeline for a bit, because while it sounds fiddly and lawyery and stupid, this is really dangerous territory for Trump. This is the stuff that ended up loving over Nixon. Investigating Whitewater was the start, but stonewalling the opposition, refusing to hand stuff over and firing special prosecutors is what got a whole bunch of people to turn on him. Well he's claimed to want to be a Nixonian presence, lets hope that includes being discharged from office (hopefully on his first term)
|
# ¿ May 5, 2017 21:48 |
|
Some Penn State frat killed a pledge be delaying treatment for multiple head injuries. This happened despite having security cameras capture the entire event and these stains searching Google.for poo poo like "hazing deaths"
|
# ¿ May 6, 2017 05:13 |
|
Yeah!!!! Lock her up!! Lock her up! Lock her up!
|
# ¿ May 6, 2017 16:03 |
|
Singapore air is pretty great for heading to asia
|
# ¿ May 7, 2017 06:51 |
|
Missionary Positron posted:https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/status/861197871206592514 Well they did just give another major middle finger to the electoral legitimacy and independence of the west. Perhaps they should be on edge
|
# ¿ May 7, 2017 16:13 |
|
bleh, I guess we do have the crown of stupidest democracy
|
# ¿ May 8, 2017 00:01 |
|
Genocide Tendency posted:While demonstrating an astounding level of ignorance and managing to be loving wrong, he brings up an issue that at some point someone needs to explain. Uh probably to monitor his activities and more completely understand who he was working for and trying to accomplish. Also if Obama had set the process in motion then this whole fiasco wouldn't be blowing up in Trump's face.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2017 18:49 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:His clearance wasn't revoked because he wasn't fired for being in bed with Russians. After he separated from the military, his clearance went inactive just like anyone else's. It probably wasn't worth the hassle to revoke an inactive clearance and it was on the Trump clock that his clearance would have been reactivated. It also would have almost undoubtedly have been painted as partisan politics, considering that Flynn was Trump's guy well before Obama and fuckface met
|
# ¿ May 8, 2017 19:12 |
|
Jesus this poo poo is so embarrassing goddamn Edit: I guess it's just difficult coming to terms that in the 21st century part of being an American is the blase acceptance that foreign agents have infiltrated some of the highest offices of our nation and have seriously undermined our electoral process without any comeuppance Kawasaki Nun fucked around with this message at 00:42 on May 9, 2017 |
# ¿ May 9, 2017 00:38 |
|
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/sally-yates-michael-flynn-underlying-conduct-problematic So if Flynn did something, that can't be disclosed due to confidential sourcing, but the Russian's were aware of? Some kind of underage honeypot operation? Hooker strangler? Seems like it'd have to be both insidious and depraved considering this dude was a General.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2017 01:59 |
|
Two Finger posted:Pence is gonna be terrible. Like really goddamned terrible, because he's your standard issue god-fearing R. Yeah, the much overstated efficacy of Pence would be at ends with the fact that the dude whose coat-tails he rode into the oval office was successfully impeached. This current crisis seems like a real tripwire for me. If nothing happens, and I really don't expect it to, then I'm gonna go after that Canadian law degree. I can fully understand the reason why so many American politicians at the turn of the 20th century were hesitant to adopt the role of world power. Americans are too busy for that.
|
# ¿ May 10, 2017 08:27 |
|
Office Pig posted:Bannon. Double dealing? No, nononon. He was brokering peace with two soverign nation's separately on the same day or some poo poo
|
# ¿ May 12, 2017 00:25 |
|
nullscan posted:Watch it come out that one of Trump's cronies owns shares in Pelican Cases or some stupid poo poo. What threat is this ban even trying to stop? There was an announcement that some groups had gotten ahold of TSA screening equipment and were working on designing explosives that wouldn't be immediately detectable and would fit I side a laptop iirc
|
# ¿ May 12, 2017 06:16 |
|
The Wannacry hack seems uh, a bit uh, visible? Like I understand that that it was just a mashing of a lame virus and a great, NSA tier exploit together, but it seemed to me like a particularly brash and stupid move? Like There is not a more visible way of emphasizing the vulnerability of tons of systems to this exploit than to attach ransomware to it. Looking forward to seeing more analysis of how it was initially launched and what the purpose was. Getting 28 people to send 300$ worth of bitcoin to the perpetrators seems ridiculously undervalued for the scope and breadth of systems that were accessed by the DEEPBLUE exploit or whatever. Seems suspect that this was just some jackass spoiling the pot because they could.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2017 08:12 |
|
Laranzu posted:Or they wanted to weaponize it and deploy before everyone was fully aware of how vulnerable their networks are, or some other group took advantage of it. It seems like a lovely rush job considering how little thought went into their anti-forensic code. Wouldn't that be something that could and probably was accomplished without the insane profile that ransomware entails? Seem to me that alot of people could have (or probably did) infect a whole slew of systems using this exploit, which have since been put on red-alert as a consequence of how ransom ware makes poo poo inoperable. Or I've watched hackers too many times.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2017 09:43 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Even if he doesn't get impeached, his credibility is pretty much gone, whatever there was left of it. That which is dead can never die
|
# ¿ May 17, 2017 00:30 |
|
Well if Geno fuckface is ready then what are we waiting for? This guy has dreams damnit! and you all just want to poo poo all over them
|
# ¿ May 17, 2017 03:30 |
|
Godholio posted:Not really...tasers and pepper spray are the only possibilities, and they're always useful. She thought he was on PCP (she was right) and there are a bunch of cases where tasers (and pepper spray) are completely ineffective on such people. If I'm walking up on a guy who keeps putting his hands in his pockets, refusing to comply with any commands, and there's anything close to the size disparity as there was here, I'm probably going to reach for the option that's more likely to be effective in neutralizing the potential threat. Which is, ultimately, the goal. gently caress yeah!!! Neutralize all drug users!!!
|
# ¿ May 21, 2017 20:31 |
|
You see, if you make a bunch of assumptions that someone is dangerous, and then define their actions by those assumptions, shooting an unarmed person is completely reasonable! Sometimes these assumptions even turn out to be true! Well, some of them do. But what can be done ?
|
# ¿ May 21, 2017 20:39 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:According to witnesses, the perpetrator was walking down the street, screaming, at 3AM, with a knife. Apparently the arresting officers said he was speaking, but his words didn't make sense. It sounds more like someone having a psychotic break than a premeditated hate crime. alt-right retardation can sound alot like nonsense to people who are unfamiliar with it. Are there any particulars that make you think it was a psychotic break or is that just wishful thinking?
|
# ¿ May 22, 2017 02:43 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Again, that does not match with similar past events. Why would you commit a premeditated crime in front of multiple witnesses if you wanted to get away with it? Why would you lay your hopes on an insanity defense, hoping that a jury will "just" sentence you to indefinite incarceration in a mental institution without criminal culpability, when southern juries have already shown themselves willing to accept rather thin self defense claims? Why would you attribute a member of the "alt-reich" with rational planning facilities? Why would you give someone that was a member of an online hate group the benefit of the doubt wrt knowing the prevailing standard for legal defenses? why would you ask such pointless questions? Edit: "Hmmm, this nazi wasn't acting behaving rationally? What was realllly going on here?" Kawasaki Nun fucked around with this message at 04:07 on May 22, 2017 |
# ¿ May 22, 2017 04:05 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Believing irrational things doesn't make people irrational actors. "That Pope Francis, total nut job, thinks he was picked by God to be in charge of the church, no idea what he'll do next." I get that y'all really want this to be about Internet racists killing an upstanding young man, but I'm pretty sure you're going to have to settle for Bowlcut McDipshit getting a needle in his arm some time later this decade. Believing irrational things does make people behave irrationally with regards to those beliefs. I don't give a poo poo one way or the other, I'm just wondering what led to your (seemingly iron-clad) assumption that this was a case of mental illness as opposed to racial malice. Sure, sans context, someone behaving the way this shithead behaved could suggest they had a mental break. Knowing that they were an active member of an online hate group certainly muddies the waters to the point that I wouldn't feel quite as comfortable making the assumptions and judgements that you seem willing to. Victor Vermis posted:While you rally against the boogeyman of fascism, the corporate oligarchy lures you deeper into the beige-white interior of your own bourgeoisie pipe dreams. I'm actually vegan sooo.... (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ May 22, 2017 04:35 |
|
It's gonna be pretty funny when Montanans elect a jail bird
|
# ¿ May 25, 2017 04:01 |
|
Have you guys hoping the GOP tank healthcare ever been around poor sick people? Cuz they'll def die. Like alot of people. Millions even.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:40 |
|
Well I don't want them dead because their tax dollars and the tax dollars of their Lord's pay my goddman welfare!
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 04:53 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:America is a violent and brutal nation. Always has been. Most of our founding fathers literally owned other humans, and were not unfamiliar with killing. Aaron Burr was the sitting Vice President when he killed Alexander Hamilton. Andrew Jackson liked nothing more than to step outside, and had killed a man in a duel before he became our 7th President. He then went on to ignore the Supreme Court and instigate something that we still refer to, not inaccurately, as "The Trail of Tears." Preston Brooks' constituents re-elected him after he beat Senator Charles Sumner unconscious with a cane, leaving wounds that required three years of recuperation. (He was aided and abetted by Laurence Keitt, who brandished a pistol in the Senate chambers to keep onlookers from coming to Sumner's aid, and Henry Edmundson, who had previously been arrested by the Sergeant at Arms for assaulting another Senator.) What's your point? You go back 80ish years in Japanese politics and they were beheading captured American soldiers. I don't see them returning to that. 50 years ago people were marching for equal rights in the south. Around the same time a sitting president decided to rescind the presidency rather than face impeachment. If you have to reach back over a century to draw parallels to today, it might be because the actions of the present are indefnisble Edit: Cain killed Abel, and maybe we'll never get past that as a society? Who can say....
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 05:15 |
|
Godholio posted:The point is that we never stopped. I don't think generalizing those events onto the entirety of the united States is particularly representative or anything. Are turfwars between gangs in Illinois and California a sign that the country never developed past violent factionism?
|
# ¿ May 26, 2017 14:33 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Perhaps, instead of thinking of our current detente as a natural evolution, you should consider it an anomaly, and that our political struggles being coupled with physical violence is actually the normal state of affairs. Like peace in Europe, it's worth working towards, but it isn't how things have been for most of history, or are guaranteed to be in the future. If you got punched in the face every day for a couple years would you also think complaining about that would be odd? People have taken issue with this kind of behavior since day 1. The caning of Charles Sumner is a pretty prime example of this. I dunno why you would bring up an incredibly contriversal act of violence in the era just prior to civil war as some type of status quo. It literally preceded the most significant upheaval of American society since its inception
|
# ¿ May 27, 2017 20:37 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 20:34 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:You might be in for a surprise. Press found his Facebook, which, uh, sure is something. Is there literally anyone who isn't a multi-millionaire who has a coherent, conservative, pro-Trump political philosophy? His whole approach to governing is FYGM. If I kill someone while drunk, is alcohol to blame? No, but it certainly would seem that in most cases that it was an aggravating factor. By my estimation being crazy while dangerous rhetoric is being normalized is more problematic than being crazy in the absence of that rhetoric.
|
# ¿ May 27, 2017 20:45 |