Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
big shtick energy
May 27, 2004


I am a C programmer and I dread my eventually replacement by kids writing JavaScript

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

big shtick energy
May 27, 2004


echinopsis posted:

i have used c when i programmed arduino poo poo and it was fine but also having object orientated poo poo i can't even imagine using c to do some things

you can make C that's kind of object-oriented if you want, structs full of function pointers everywhere. you can even inherit by casting a struct full of function pointers to another struct full of function pointers

don't ever do this. cumulatively it probably wasted a month of developer time

big shtick energy
May 27, 2004


The Management posted:

you don't cast, you include the parent struct in the child. if you want to use the "super" you explicitly take a pointer to that member. this is easy to do and I'm not sure why it would waste more time than any other code.

the time wasting came from that design pattern breaking the IDE's autocomplete, ability to look up function definitions, and often even the syntax checker. it was adept at wasting many 30 second to 2 minute increments, especially considering those functions were often called by macros that were 3-4 layers deep, generally defined in different files of course

Also the way you describe inheritance sounds much more sane than how it was done by our ~~*software architect*~~

  • Locked thread