|
ate all the Oreos posted:Apple doesn't make chips AMD doesn't either, they sold their fabs ages ago. They do what Apple does: design in-house and have someone else produce silicon.
|
#
¿
May 3, 2017 13:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 01:48 |
|
|
Tamba posted:http://wealthgenerators.com/get-started-us/ Are you arguing against the whole class of roboadvisors, or against financial instrument advertising as a whole, or what? There are billions under management by roboadvisors, and every financial instrument advertises based on historical results with that disclaimer. This may be a lovely one, but I think you'll need to go into more detail to say why.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2017 13:51
|
|
|
I'm not sure "take financial advice from employer regarding pension choices" is always a slam dunk either, mind.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2017 14:05
|
|
|
ate all the Oreos posted:For some reason I thought that was only for their graphics chips but I guess I misread that, okay Pretty sure it's all GloFo now.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2017 14:12
|
|
|
It'll be the producer's car.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2017 15:16
|
|
|
22 Eargesplitten posted:How? I know Supreme stuff is expensive, but that can't even be $400, leaving the jeans and shoes to be $2600. Maybe it's an expensive but not flashy watch, some stupid expensive even by male fashion standards jeans, and some rare sneakers he had to buy off of a scalper? There are sneakers that list at $1800, and people apparently buy them. http://www.esquire.com/style/mens-accessories/advice/g2538/luxury-sneaker-brands-worth-spending-money/ for a randomly chosen set of examples. $1000 on jeans, perhaps obviously, doesn't take much work at all.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
RVs are more like homes than cars, at the high end.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2017 20:27
|
|
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:uhh not in how they depriciate Sorry, I meant in pricing and use (and probably maintenance costs). You're absolutely right from a long-term value perspective.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
Virtue posted:Why did you decide to inject race and gender into the discussion? That's just what she does because it's pretty much always relevant.
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
People often ask illegal questions naively rather than maliciously too. I talk to a lot of startups about hiring and the percentage that might ask things like "do you have any kids?" or "whereabouts do you live?" (both just to be social) is about 110. We did a lot of interviewing and implicit bias training at my last job, and people were always very surprised at what you shouldn't be asking.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
Zo posted:uhhhh There are lots of things it could cite, but I'm on my phone so 
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Colin Mockery posted:No. If you want to make polite/semi-revelant location-based small-talk, you can ask "How was the commute? Was getting here okay?" Nope. Don't ask about how they traveled.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:32
|
|
|
Zo posted:lol sure feel free whenever to find a source confirming that interviewers can't ask what your address is https://www.google.ca/search?q=interview+question+where+do+you+live&oq=interview+question+where+do+you+live
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 02:58
|
|
|
Ornamented Death posted:A few guys I work with don't seem to register purchases under a certain dollar amount. Isn't that true of virtually everyone? For some people it's $1, for others it's $20 or $100 or whatever. Do people do budget math for a pack of gum? I've been poor, but I haven't been as disciplined as that. Setting that threshold too high for your financial circumstances is BWM for sure.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
Kirios posted:Learning to grill after being years of lazy was one of the most rewarding things I've done for myself in a very long time. Wife and I love doing it once or twice a week, and it's more meals cooked inside to save money. You aren't literally grilling inside, right?
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
They're real cooking.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
Are CSAs BWM? Looking for a pre-emptive judgment.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 20:07
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Not if you really like vegetables, aren't picky about what you get, and have a lot of mouths to feed. Otherwise you'll slowly be buried in kale. The ones near me seem to have "you live alone and want some vegetables to ease your pathetic loneliness" options, which will hopefully keep my compost pile from consuming my yard. Mostly they do organic, which I don't care about, but the local options are nice. (I live in Toronto so I presume it's going to be beets, potatoes, and greenhouse tomatoes for 4 months.)
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
Ketchup contains tomato, which is a fruit.
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
I know someone with literally millions of dollars in a savings account for the last 8 months or so, because she finds everything to do with money severely anxiety-provoking. I told her that if she hadn't figured out how to deal with it by the end of May I was coming over and "forcibly" putting half of it in an ETF. We shall see.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
Ixian posted:principle I don't think he had enough principles to live on.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Nail Rat posted:
Amazon was public for 4 years before its first profitable quarter, let alone year; until a few years ago it still routinely lost money. Snap just raised a pile on the public markets without a plan for profitability at all. You don't need VC gravy to keep going.
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 17:14
|
|
if you think a company that's never turned a profit will be around in 15 years. That VC gravy train won't last forever.
|
overdesigned posted:Snap also lost 20% of its market cap in a single day on a report that it can't grow users or revenue, so maybe not the best thing to use here. Investor storytime as actual business plan is BWM. Snap didn't lose any of its operating funds when that happened. My point is that unprofitable companies, especially high-profile ones, can raise funds to operate without needing venture capital. Snap could almost certainly raise more money with a second public offering as soon as next year, though they probably wouldn't enjoy pricing the round. E: do you really think that investor storytime has been BWM for Evan?
|
|
#
¿
May 19, 2017 17:43
|
|
|
Redacting the email, phone number, and right-hand student's first name might have been cool.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2017 16:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 01:03
|
|
|
Technically those are a form of candle.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
The mortgage interest tax deduction is regressive bullshit.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
Droo posted:I think the idea is that home ownership is good for society It's mostly an accident of tax-policy history, now enshrined by those who benefit from it. https://taxfoundation.org/history-mortgage-interest-deduction/
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2017 19:17
|
|
|
If you bought them in the 70s, are you still paying any mortgage interest on them? But no, don't settle for anything but outright removal.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
Sundae posted:Oops, sorry - I was referring to the previous Prop 13 derail, not the Mortgage Interest Deduction one. Apologies. Ah, my bad!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:Was a horse driving? Seahorse.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 00:07
|
|
|
LLCoolJD posted:There's a huge difference between not taxing someone for something and giving free things away to people. Not really, no.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 00:34
|
|
|
There were other key design choices in Snapchat, but ephemerality was the initial cornerstone, yes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 13:34
|
|
|
My GF and I use mostly it to send goofy pics between our kids, or "is this the type of shampoo you meant?" messages that don't need to live forever in our photo collections. Our daughters just save local copies of pics/videos with filters to send to their parents or friends via other channels.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
monster on a stick posted:People don't usually leave their tax returns out two months after they were due. It definitely happens. Also, if you filed an extension, they weren't due in April. Also also we don't know when his company's end of year is. Mine's in July, details are on my desk right now. E: oh, this might be the assessment and not the returns, but the assessment could have just come back for the same reasons
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2017 22:56
|
|
|
I skimmed the post and formed a mental model that maximized my amusement. I suspect it was fair to neither party, and revealed unconscionable bias, but I had a good time.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 00:06
|
|
|
(Thank you, thread, for reminding me that I need to finish filing FBAR to avoid tens of thousands in BWM penalties. Worth my  right there.)
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
baquerd posted:I don't understand. Based on TB's posts, I assume your boss was a woman? Kindly gently caress off.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2017 00:19
|
|
|
Dillbag posted:If he has 80k in his TFSA he must be doing great because the cumulative deposit limit since 2009 is only 52k. No, he has 80K including TFSA.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 01:48 |
|
|
Suspicious Lump posted:This is from, ~10 pages ago, but can you seriously purchase a filter on snapchat so every single picture has an overlay on it in a specific location? It's available to the user, not mandatory.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2017 10:07
|
|