|
He suffered from what I presume was momentary goontitis and posted dumb.
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 08:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 05:06 |
|
|
CSPAM, not even once.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 09:15
|
|
|
WaltherFeng posted:He suffered from what I presume was momentary goontitis and posted dumb. happens to the best and the worst of us and also everyone in between
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 15:00
|
|
|
Bloody Pom posted:CSPAM, not even once. Worse, gbs
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 15:51
|
|
|
GBS and D&D lmao
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2024 18:55
|
|
|
https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/an...miles-per-hour/ oh no we're approaching strangereal
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 05:17
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/an...miles-per-hour/ Something something "do not create the torment nexus".
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 05:51
|
|
|
Belka is to blame.
|
|
#
?
Apr 20, 2024 11:19
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/an...miles-per-hour/ Looking for some details, it seems the military isn't releasing who won. Which probably means the AI got taken to the cleaners. You get something that can beat your aces, you brag about it so the world needs its brown pants and the people with the pocketbooks open them wide. It does well, you say it was able to win against veteran pilots without giving up the ratio, for the same reasons. If you just say it's performing "very well" and "beating milestones", then that suggests you don't have something more concrete to brag about in a way the public would appreciate. So, you just say it did well, point back to the simulator fights, and raise your eyebrows knowingly in the hopes that the people in charge of funding nod and make the assumptions you hope they will.
|
|
#
?
Apr 21, 2024 04:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 6, 2024 05:06 |
|
|
TuxedoOrca posted:Belka is to blame. Yeah, his router should have eaten the bad posts.
|
|
#
?
Apr 22, 2024 14:58
|
|
