|
jazzyhattrick posted:Operation Temperer. On the news earlier the way they said it made it sound like operation tempura, which would be a pretty strange name for a counter terrorism operation. operation tempura is actually a great plan against the actual root of Islamic extremists - the Wasabists
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 18:31 |
|
|
VikingSkull posted:lol @ all the GBS dudes who got probated in the D&D thread don't blame them, they aren't aware that the old ruthlessly neutral dnd was murdered by hillary along with vilerat and dnd is just a regular circlejerk clique subforum now not that that's a bad thing, the circlejerk i mean
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 07:13
|
|
|
Justin Godscock posted:It always has been the only thing that's changed is the political alignment that happens with the mass-banning every four years. the posters sure, but old dnd modding forced their regulars to engage obvious effort trolls on the merits (which was hilarious) instead of the current mods who gleefully join in on the "gently caress off" "gently caress you" etc
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 07:20
|
|
|
Psycho Society posted:Also btw gutting access to healthcare will kill far more people than a hundred flashy bombs going off, that doesn't stimulate the toddler-like fear centers in your brain though because you are incapable of foresight. 50,000 people a year, you dumb fucks, which is also about as many people who die because baby boomers decide not to get flu vaccines before they hold babies and visit nursing homes you're so stupid lol. different groups of people care about different things. and guess what? poverty and healthcare are completely irrelevant to rich people. rich people decide government policy. they won't give a poo poo if a billion poors die to preventable diseases and hunger since it will never affect them ever, in any way. whereas their idiot daughter being exploded at a concert has a 0.0000000001% chance of happening but that chance is still infinitely more likely than losing healthcare lmao. it's completely logical.
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
maskenfreiheit posted:Mass surveillance doesn't stop terrorists uh that just proves mass surveillance does, in fact, stop terrorists. if the government wants to stop terrorists. mini mohammed here wouldn't have been able to get into new york or whatever since the FBI clearly had him on a high priority list. on the other hand, the UK's policy is explicitly designed to let in terrorists so I'm sure they got exactly what they wanted - proving that they aren't racist by letting terrorists blow them up. well i gotta admit, UK, at least you aren't racist.
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 18:31 |
|
|
paul_soccer10 posted:Nice post thanks, friend
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2017 03:11
|
|