Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Sekhmet
Nov 16, 2001


BeanBandit posted:

Right, I misinterpreted what the vet originally said before about my cat not eating. She meant that if a sick and old cat doesn't eat anything for three days in a row, that's typically a sign that they're not going to get significantly better and that it's time to start thinking about euthanization. The alternative is almost always a protracted death by starvation, which would obviously be inhumane and unnecessary.

Yes, this is a major difference in philosophy between human and veterinary hospice/end of life care. In a human they'll do some more invasive things often to supplement so people don't die of starvation. We can certainly do these types of things in dogs/cats but typically it's not the best option for long-term if the animal isn't going to improve on its own, since we have the option of euthanasia.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread