|
"Report: Girl in Weiner sexting case lied to damage Clinton" That's right folks, looks like it's time for another vast right-wing conspiracy The Hill is reporting that the underage girl groomed and sexted by Anthony Weiner is *not* the victim your bleeding heart might have believed. Instead, this loose trollop was a honeypot planted to lure Anthony Weiner into a trap that would undo the presidential ambitions of our once and future queen, Hillary Rodham Clinton. The Hill claims that, according to nonprofit investigators Who What Why, the girl that the 52-year old man was graphically sexting was not 15, contrary to what was reported, what was claimed in court documents, and what he claimed in his own plea deal. No, they claim the girl was actually 16. Which clears everything up, and totally absolves him of the federal crime he just plead guilty to, right? Oh wait, no it doesn't. The proof of this is allegedly her learners permit, but you're not allowed to see this evidence. In fact, you're not allowed to see any of the evidence for anything claimed! Anyway, this "lie" was "clearly designed to produce the maximum public outrage and put Weiner in greater legal jeopardy." All designed with the intent of creating maximum problems for Hillary right before her election, in an attempt to "sand bag her" with the exploitation of a minor. If that wasn't bad enough, the girl asked for it, by initiating everything, they claim. Furthermore, this girl and her family aren't even good people. Her parents were..... Republicans. After the teenage girl was sexted by a 52 year old Democrat with close ties to the Democratic presidential candidate, "the victim celebrated Trump's victory on social media." Additionally, "her father is a registered Republican" and has a criminal record, and “her mother tweeted derisively about the Black Lives Matter movement.” Hopefully we can all come together to apologize to the unfairly maligned victims here, Anthony Weiner and more importantly, Hillary Clinton 
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 17:18 |
|
|
his last name is a euphemism for a penis
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
The Hill should be destroyed
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
walgreenslatino posted:according to nonprofit investigators Who What Why hmm, I've never heard of Who What Why. better Google a bit to find out what they're abou- quote:Baker is the founder and editor-in-chief of the news website WhoWhatWhy, which highlights what he describes as "a vast, secret nexus of power and money" ignored by what Baker believes is a complicit mass media. great job, The Hill, you sourced a story from a 9/11 truther who thinks that Watergate and the JFK assassination were both deep-state conspiracies by the CIA and the Bush clan to punish presidents for going against Texan and Russian oil interests
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:hmm, I've never heard of Who What Why. better Google a bit to find out what they're abou- Look, that teenaged Jezebel has it coming alright?
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
But what does Chelsea have to say about this??
|
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 16:33
|
|
|
thank god, i was worried hillary lost because everyone in america hates her glad to know that had nothing to do with it.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 16:57
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:hmm, I've never heard of Who What Why. better Google a bit to find out what they're abou- oh my god I had no idea it was Russ Baker hahaha Wikipedia posted:In March 2010, he appeared before the "Treason in America Conference," a gathering of Sept. 11 truthers. Baker said the 9/11 commission had “no credibility,” and "sounded open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job."[4] In 2014 he addressed a conference of the Assassination Archives and Research Center on the "role of the Warren Commission on the cover-up."[24] He has appeared frequently on Coast to Coast AM,[25] a radio show hosted by George Noory that deals with the paranormal and conspiracy theories. COAST TO COAST AM
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 17:37
|
|
|
walgreenslatino posted:oh my god I had no idea it was Russ Baker hahaha I haven't heard him on Coast to Coast! wonder if any episode with him on it is available for download, I've got to check
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 17:49
|
|
|
why did/still are people defending weiner? he was an ok politician but he ended up being a massive sack of poo poo who turned out to be even a bigger sack of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:why did/still are people defending weiner? he was an ok politician but he ended up being a massive sack of poo poo who turned out to be even a bigger sack of poo poo. First, even disregarding the obvious angle to attack Hillary Clinton's campaign, it's actually known as ephebophilia,
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:why did/still are people defending weiner? he was an ok politician but he ended up being a massive sack of poo poo who turned out to be even a bigger sack of poo poo. BUT HE WAS ON OUR TEAM!
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
I thought the Democrats were way too fast to throw Weiner under the bus the first time around, but it turned out he really was a disgusting pervert. 
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:55
|
|
|
other than that hill article I've never heard anyone defend weiner, closest I've seen is dumbfounded disbelief or sadness because he seemed like the only big profile democrat with a spine back when his fortunes were rising, then turned out to just be a big dumb pervert, the dumb part being the biggest problem. He could've even made a decent come back since americans love a redemption story but nope instead it was dick pics to kids
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 19:58
|
|
|
Pener Kropoopkin posted:I thought the Democrats were way too fast to throw Weiner under the bus the first time around, but it turned out he really was a disgusting pervert. nah he deserved it the first time too, because of the terrible job of damage control making it a much bigger issue rather than just quietly doing his time on the humility circuit he proved he was a liability, especially since he was so aggressive and antagonistic
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
weiner
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:02
|
|
|
You're gonna say "MISTER DANGER! PLEASE! WE DON'T WANNA WEIN ANYMORE! IT'S TOO MUCH WEINING! WE CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE!", and I'm gonna say "I DON'T GIVE A drat!" - Anthony Weiner, at his trial, to applause.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
i like the quote in the article that says "she was actually closer to seventeen than fifteen" lmao
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:05
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:i like the quote in the article that says "she was actually closer to seventeen than fifteen" a critical detail the mainstream media is sure to overlook!
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
Connects red string to picture of Seth Rich and a 16 year old girl
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:36
|
|
|
The push now was to pretend it never happened, which is why I was surprise by the brazenness of the smear against the victim. I mean, this was pretty brazen too in its demands that you stop caring: "Can we now stop talking about Anthony Weiner? Like, forever?" "it makes us look bad. stop talking about this."
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
RaySmuckles posted:i like the quote in the article that says "she was actually closer to seventeen than fifteen" the original WhoWhatNow article spends like four paragraphs ranting about age of consent laws and how much of an effect the exact age of the underage girl will have on the judge and jury
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 20:58
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:the original WhoWhatNow article spends like four paragraphs ranting about age of consent laws and how much of an effect the exact age of the underage girl will have on the judge and jury He only THOUGHT he was graphically describing the sexual acts he wished to perform to a 15 year old girl. It's like how the guys on To Catch a Predator only THOUGHT they were driving to the home of an unaccompanied minor. Who can truly say if they've committed a crime
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 21:04
|
|
|
Free the Wein!
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 21:29
|
|
|
we're getting initial reports that his name means penis, stay tuned for updates.
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
a helpful bear posted:his last name is a euphemism for a penis /thread
|
|
#
?
May 23, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
I lolled on how Hillary setup Weiner with Huma, from elections to matchmaking Dread Abuela is pretty horrible.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 00:13
|
|
|
carlos danger
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 00:23
|
|
|
Peel posted:carlos danger more like carlos stranger danger
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 00:54
|
|
|
What kind of person do you have to be to continue defending Anthony Weiner at this point. He's been a political liability for years. Disown the pederast already.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:13
|
|
|
a helpful bear posted:his last name is a euphemism for a penis mine is a euphemism for promiscuous but it dont help 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
Peel posted:carlos danger Ron mexico
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 01:39
|
|
|
Lamebot posted:What kind of person do you have to be to continue defending Anthony Weiner at this point. He's been a political liability for years. Disown the pederast already. probably a made up person
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:01
|
|
|
etalian posted:I lolled on how Hillary setup Weiner with Huma, from elections to matchmaking Dread Abuela is pretty horrible. 
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
mrbradlymrmartin posted:mine is a euphemism for promiscuous but it dont help im sorry to hear that mr slut
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
a helpful bear posted:im sorry to hear that mr slut like actually its an obscure word that means something quite benign but it aint in most folks vocab so they start thinkin filthy thoughts then ask me questions to which the answers oughta be none of your business but are usually just "  "
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
Lamebot posted:What kind of person do you have to be to continue defending Anthony Weiner at this point. He's been a political liability for years. Disown the pederast already. paranoid conspiracy nutjob who thinks it's awful convenient that a guy with a history of sex scandals would just so happen to have a sex scandal sometime in the vicinity of an election year its really easy to fool yourself into seeing conspiracies everywhere if you desperately want there to be conspiracies
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:27
|
|
|
;_; that feel
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:37
|
|
|
Main Paineframe posted:paranoid conspiracy nutjob who thinks it's awful convenient that a guy with a history of sex scandals would just so happen to have a sex scandal sometime in the vicinity of an election year What's great is the conspiracy theorists mostly don't have to make really elaborate spiderwebs to connect power elites, just make them hyper competent rather than clowns bumbling around and sometimes succeeding in spite of themselves
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 17:18 |
|
|
framed weiner
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2017 03:04
|
|
