|
He looks like a little boy with gray hair and giant ears. He's an adorable little racist elf.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 19:51 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 16:19 |
|
Warner just rattling off eleven million things, any one of which could sink the fucker. I bet he's having a good time up there.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 19:53 |
|
He has little racist glasses
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 19:55 |
|
"Recall" count: 1.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 19:56 |
|
An appalling and detestable lie, you say? Can't imagine where we'd have heard those.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 19:58 |
|
Routine, uh, um, many routine, routine, situations
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:00 |
|
28CFR 45.2 required it! Apparently.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:03 |
|
"He didn't recall this" THE TABLES HAVE TURNED
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:06 |
|
Overdose rate? What? Isn't that... oh well, whatever, he knows it's opioids he's just being a disingenuous motherfucker. e: I admit it, I love the phrase "I recognize myself".
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:09 |
|
Did he just say he came as an interested citizen i.e. not as a senator OR as a surrogate? No way he hasn't contradicted that before.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:12 |
|
28 CFR 45.2 is back, baby! (we should start a counter.)
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:14 |
|
He can't even answer an actual normal boring question. Shook e: hmm, that's not technically a yes to not doing anything, just an allusion to the recusal
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:22 |
|
"Longstanding policy" to not comment for "confidential reasons that are founded in coequal branch powers in the Constitution of the United States" holy poo poo NAIL HIM on that Warner
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:24 |
|
"Historically, we've seen that they shouldn't be revealed." Well, yes. But historically we've also seen the Civil War, for instance, and nobody but you J. Beauregard S. thinks we should keep doing that. e: and yes he's calling him Mr. Chairman, he's the assistant chairman or whatever, I assume that's technically correct
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:25 |
|
...I wonder if that one will actually play in Peoria. "You were his superior, there were strong concerns, and you didn't say poo poo until he was fired".
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:26 |
|
Is there a single thing in the Steele Dossier that has been "thoroughly discredited"? I thought we had confirmation of everything except the piss tape and nothing was wrong that we knew of.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:35 |
|
"Unfiltered by what the media's gonna put out" I'm enjoying that I can figure out what party each person is just by their stupid loving sentences.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:36 |
|
I absolutely don't believe he hasn't been asked to do an illegal thing. Even if it was a joking statement. Hell, I bet we've got one on tape already.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:37 |
|
Feinstein genuinely sounded baffled for a second there when she heard "I can't discuss that". e: why did this CBSN stream just cut to a headshot of Comey
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:40 |
|
Comey's stunning USURPATION of the Clinton Prosecution yeah motherfucker everyone cares that's not red meat at all
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:43 |
|
Huh, Rubio asking an actually good question. What's his angle for caring if Sessions thought the president was doing something untoward with Comey?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:45 |
|
Vegetable posted:this is a nothingburger question, stop being impressed by rubio
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:47 |
|
Wyden's certainly pissed off about executive privilege, that's for sure.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:49 |
|
Historic policies of the Department of Justice... wait a minute, is tthere a line to formally declare something as part of "confidential communications"?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:51 |
|
What the hell was that poo poo, Beauregard?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:53 |
|
I'm confused on multiple levels about what's going on here but I'm glad Wyden is yelling at a racist Keebler elf, at least
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 20:54 |
|
Jesus. Literally quoting the oath.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:01 |
|
"The President's Constitution right" What right is that, Beauregard?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:02 |
|
The Clinton Declination is my new Tom Clancy knockoff novel.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:06 |
|
Is Burr hinting that he's happy with the admiral's closed-committee answers, or is it typical to state things for the record like that?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:08 |
|
The purpose of the mustache is to strain out the faint "bullshit" that King's probably mumbling right now.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:15 |
|
Boot and Rally posted:Oh, so the president is going to assert a privileged to be named later.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:16 |
|
He definitely just said "it was a communication... if any such occurred, it would have been a communication"
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:17 |
|
"You might have been very critical of me!" really, not critical of the Attorney General being completely out of the loop here?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:18 |
|
Bluntly? No, Blunt was the earlier guy and Lee isn't here.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:20 |
|
Pollyanna posted:Do they maintain a particular ratio of senators in these hearings? It would suck if they stacked it with Rs. (actually I think it's +1 R on this committee because, you know, odd number.)
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:24 |
|
Every time Manchin's at that angle that makes his chin stand out from his lower cheek I chuckle at his "man chin" basically I'm just dadposting hard in this thread I am so sorry.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:25 |
|
Actually, I'm kinda surprised Manchin is asking about sanctions. That seems like he came in fixated on that and has totally dropped the executive privilege thing. (come on Kamala, handle it) e: interesting, he didn't ask "will you closed session", he asked "would a closed session change your answers"
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:26 |
|
This is a good list. Priebus, Miller, Lewandowski? Thanks Manchin.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 16:19 |
|
"If you were sitting on this side of the dais, what question would you be asking?" Man I'm really sad he didn't answer that with "what would you say if you were me" riddle-style
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 21:30 |