Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

logikv9 posted:

Data 2020

:kiss:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief
if he can't do a charismatic stump speech he should gtfo now

pro tip

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief
the fuckerberg is here to wage a blitzkrieg on that rear end, America

let fuckerberg lay pipe, today!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Zuck!
will be the first prez never to witness poverty in person
Zuck!
be the change you wanna see
the proud boys had their turn, so
let the tech bros have their turn
it's his turn!
Zuck!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

logikv9 posted:

can't wait for zuck to somehow start appealing to rural whites and southern blacks

well if you believe succ zone, the southern black vote is not needed, because the south is red anyway, and zuck will appeal to the Midwest by merely showing his face, and pressing some flesh

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Work Friend Keven posted:

Running out of touch technocratic elites hasn't worked... but what if we ran an out of touch technocratic elite who's also a 16 year old ginger Jew, somehow.

well we ran an out of touch corrupt billionaire traitor

so, clearly america's only gripe, when it comes to winning, is the technocrat, and female part

oh wait, obamma was a technocrat, so not that either

Fuckerberg will be fine

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 18:11 on Jun 24, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

well played :golfclap:

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

pushpins posted:

Zuck gonna win rural whites with a cornbread, sour cream, tater tot abomination that will haunt your nightmares

it will work too

i'm a cuck 4 zuck!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

good try

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief
Strong Daddy Zuck!

if the white working class line up behind him, meet your new prez america!

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

consumed by normies posted:

not sure you could design a candidate less appealing to the white working class (aside for hillary clinton)

that makes sense


which is why they will totally vote for him; after all, what does trump have to do with the white working class?

e: his open indulgence in miscegenation may present an impediment to him though :lol:

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 07:42 on Jun 28, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Baloogan posted:

zuck is death, and not in a good way. Death of consciousness. I understand why this might appeal to you.

as an alcoholic this appeals to me a great deal
:cheers:

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Trumps Baby Hands posted:

Didn't you see Social Network? His sole motivator, the thing that drove him to greater and greater achievements, was unsuccessfully trying impress his ex-girlfriend Rooney Mara

We know that this has at least some basis in fact, from a blog post he drunkenly wrote the night he crashed Harvard's network with a hot-or-not knock-off

Ladies and gentlemen, the next president of the United States of America:



https://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/538697/Mark-Zuckerberg-s-Online-Diary

what's really lol is that this is the most vulnerable type of individual to Lady Macbeth type partna's

lol, he is bein' hen pecked into runnin fo leada' o' the free world!

2017 is just so :3:

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief
@fitsmyneeds

re: Facebook modding rules

:thunk: :thunk: :thunk:

:smugjones: :barf:

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 23:38 on Jun 28, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Condiv posted:

so a bit late to the facebook moderation guidelines chat, but is qpc just there to highlight the kinds of racism that zuckerberg thinks are really cool? cause they're unprotected in p much every example i saw.

quasi protected

he has weird autist math to figure out how to apply moderation that self selects for the protection of white men, but not minority teen girls, or children

based on this, if he wins, he may kill us all

meanwhile, he is talking about the new jim crow, is visiting prisons, talking about healthcare, and has even implied he might 'legalize it', and we are still 3 years out from 2020

game theory:
the far left won't vote for him because there is nothing they hate more than someone who pays lip service to their causes without having an ideal background
they would prefer trump
if he mentions socialism,
or ending the war on drugs around centrists, they will also prefer trump
the minority vote for him will be depressed compared to clinton,
and mind you that vote didn't
help her win anyway
he will get the limousine liberal/techbro vote but it won't be enough
meanwhile, the incumbent advantage belongs to trump



TRUMP 2020

though zuck's campaign will be loving hilarious, as is the fact that he is even considering the presidency so, :munch:

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 02:28 on Jun 30, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Jeb! Repetition posted:

It's a tough choice between that and Zuck Fuckerberg.

i like your version betta

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

if his stump speeches sound like this he is hosed before he began

he is demonstrating hillary style anti septic formality, with somehow less humanity, and more forced cutesiness

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 22:26 on Jun 30, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Feldegast42 posted:

You know what guys, after careful consideration I would allow Mark Zuckerberg to have sex with my wife or significant other while I watch.

hmm

i...had otha ideas

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Jose posted:

what sort of freak eats toast straight out of the toaster :chloe:

zuck the cuck!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Larry Parrish posted:

Nearly every dystopian film has a welfare state its just they only let you stay just above starving

oh, like what we're doing now?

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Larry Parrish posted:

If the EPA and California's housing standards didn't exist San Jose would look like blade runner

i apologize i keep forgettin about cali, and it's heretical insistence on carin for it's own citizens

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Scionix posted:

Fart Hufferbug

this one has promise

Only registered members can see post attachments!

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

Condiv posted:

was augustus vertically challenged? has zuck considered some cosmetic surgery to artificially enheighten himself?

by today's standards, definitely

most people were relatively short 2000+ years ago

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

consumed by normies posted:

hes also stupidly wrong, its basically georgism which is very left wing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgism

is it inaccuracy or is it rhetoric to attract the center?
:thunk:

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

twoday posted:

I believe Maximinus Thrax would like to have a word with you.

i said most people, of course there will be outliers

e: Augustus Caesar for instance, was 5'9, whereas the average height for men today is 5'10, and the average height for men in ancient rome was 5'7, so Augustus was 2 inches taller than the average, then

for zuck to be of equivalent stature today, he would need to be 6 ft tall

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 23:16 on Jul 9, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

MaxxBot posted:

Imagine if Cuckerberg and Rubio were the nominees they'd be walking onto the debate stage in 6-inch platform shoes trying to be the taller candidate.

they would only need 3-4 inch heel lifts to do the job

if zuck trades in sneakas fo real shoes, and also looks talla
(he lyin)

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

just, lol
:dance:
:roflolmao:

Lindsey O. Graham has issued a correction as of 05:14 on Aug 3, 2017

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

hawt

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lindsey O. Graham
Dec 31, 2016

"We're not generating enough angry white guys to stay in business for the long term."

- The Chief

The Nastier Nate posted:

The article says no one wants Zuck to run for president, but I do. I want to see him embarrassed and walk away from the primary with single-digit Worth of delegates.

Disclaimer: I said that about Trump too

yeah


me too

Only registered members can see post attachments!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply