|
I prefer assemblers.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2017 01:25 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 14:44 |
|
rjmccall posted:on the other hand, how exactly are we writing the machine code without a computer? once upon a time i think you could toggle this stuff directly into memory using switches or something on the side of the storage system, but those days are gone. are they? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV1ki6LiEmg
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2017 13:44 |
|
yours for only $621
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2017 16:28 |
|
c/++ are supposed to compile down to asm in a very direct manner. if you want higher level functionality, you need to look elsewhere
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 15:18 |
|
again, totally not the use case for C (operating systems, low level programs and embedded code too big for assembly) use java or Visual Basic or whateverthefuck
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 15:40 |
|
that’s the kind of thinking that gets you systems so bloated they can’t even run on a calculator
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 16:02 |
|
yeah but then I won’t be able to run it on my Atari 800XL
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 17:10 |
|
c allows you to write code that can be ported to different hardware with minimal effort.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 20:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 14:44 |
|
Volmarias posted:I would like to write a toy compiler (or even just an interpreter for a toy language) but not want to have to read 10,000 pages first. Where should I realistically start? http://www.atariarchives.org/2bml/
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2017 20:21 |