Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
fez_machine
Nov 27, 2004

bewilderment posted:

Do a bunch of 'lit' authors put their weird fetishes in their books or is that much more a genre thing.

Mentioning Murakami is cheating.

all of them do, it's genre that's strange for demanding that an author's hosed up sexuality be excised or condemned. (psst, every author's sexuality is hosed up).

Of course artistic/intellectual merit redeems things in a way that most genre hacks could never achieve.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

fez_machine
Nov 27, 2004

Liquid Communism posted:

You're right at home with the genre crowd in spirit, then! There is no one who abhors modern society more than those deeply steeped in escapism.

no because modern society actively encourages consumptive unthinking escapism to remove desire for political action

genre crowds have practically leapt off the cliff to be absorbed into late-capitalist modern society as fandom's social forms ( esp. the convention for example) and obsessions have been reformed into the dominant mode of culture

it's the consolation that social rejection won't mean a rejection of their money/productive energies

genre fans are alienated socially/interpersonally not systemically

reading just genre poo poo is the rabbit starvation of intellectual activity, it sustains without nourishing

  • Locked thread