|
well why not posted:Hacksaw Ridge was entertaining but the gore is just so over-the-top unnecessary, it feels like simple oneupmanship towards Saving Private Ryan.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2017 09:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 12:54 |
|
In keeping with Nolan tradition, there was a character with a destructive obsession fueled by the memory of dead people, although in this case it wasn't the main character. But then again, there wasn't a main character in this film Cillian Murphy's character wanting to get the gently caress away from Dunkirk Also in keeping with Nolan tradition, he's exploring how you can never really know anything about what the gently caress is going on in the world around you. The newspapers making up bullshit propaganda about the war, Tom Hardy misinterpreting his wingman friend's wave for a signal that he was okay, Cillian Murphy being told that George was okay by the blond son, Harry Styles thinking the old man was just avoiding eye contact, etc Of all his movies though, this theme of "you don't know poo poo" is the most muted in this film. edit: It seems like in all his previous films, not knowing the truth is integral to the plot. A person is lying to themselves, or they lie to/misunderstand another character, or they're lying to/misunderstood by the public. Misinformation is typically at the center of a Nolan movie or moves the plot in a critical way. For Dunkirk it doesn't seem to be the case, unless I'm missing something? Steve Yun fucked around with this message at 10:17 on Jul 30, 2017 |
# ¿ Jul 30, 2017 08:36 |
|
oxford_town posted:That's not just the "American" perception, the mainstream British perception is that he was one of the greatest leaders of the country. The widely-held view is that he was a brilliant wartime leader but not so in peacetime, which excuses his defeat to Attlee. (This also allowed Churchill, at the time, to deflect the blame for the loss of India & the breakup of the Empire onto Attlee). coyo7e posted:You've got to keep in mind that Dunkirk was literally, a massive loss for the British and allied forces, but the British claim it was a major victory for themselves because a few folks with pleasure or fishing boats came out and picked up a few troops (nowhere near the majority of those who were rescued, though). The role of that small fleet of private boats has become basically mythologized as a paean to the strength of British nationalism. Ok I guess these answer my question from above: Steve Yun posted:edit: It seems like in all his previous films, not knowing the truth is integral to the plot. A person is lying to themselves, or they lie to/misunderstand another character, or they're lying to/misunderstood by the public. Misinformation is typically at the center of a Nolan movie or moves the plot in a critical way. For Dunkirk it doesn't seem to be the case, unless I'm missing something?
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2017 20:12 |