Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Best moment in Cobra is when the Night Slasher grabs a standing woman by the throat while he's hiding under a bed. Or the police firing range being separated from the squad room by a glass partition. Or Stallone using shears to cut his pizza.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

X-Ray Pecs posted:

The Raid has better action scenes, but I think Dredd's the better film. Its simple, brutal fights compliment the nature of the Judges, their power and iron rule. I also think Dredd's smarter and has more to say about fascism and state violence than The Raid does. I love Dredd and it's probably my favorite movie so far this decade.
An interesting difference between Dredd and the comics is that in the latter, the Judges represent the ultimate authoritarian state: they're always watching everyone, will crush or even kill ordinary people over the tiniest infraction and are backed up by overwhelming force. The movie Judges are equally authoritarian and ruthless, but are only barely clinging to power through sheer brutality.

(Although the city's been devastated often enough in the comics that the Judges are close to losing control there too, now.)

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
I hadn't seen the car chase from the Italian/Canadian Dirty Harry knock-off Blazing Magnum before, and I'd highly recommend it. (It's on YouTube.) It's a weird mix of good stuntwork (it was done by Remy Julienne, the stunt driver of The Italian Job, a bunch of Bond films and many, many more movies with car chases), low-budget corner cutting (done an impressive stunt? Now show it all over again from several different angles!) and the "eh, whatever" attitude of a lot of exploitation cinema (awkward camerawork, reactions and blocking in the pre-chase confrontation, and just drop in some funky elevator muzak at random points in lieu of a score). But the best thing is that it epitomises the 1970s car chase: two huge wallowing barges with ludicrously large engines smashing the crap out of each other on grimy, run-down streets while tyres scream and innocent bystanders get their cars flipped over.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Neo Rasa posted:

From 1991 to 1996 there was a rise in white supremacy movements (and of course the wave of black church arsons from 94~96-ish) and I think that definitely effected movies because we had this brief time in the 90s where the neo Nazi and white supremacy groups, Aryan Brotherhood, sovereign citizen types, etc. are action move villains more than before or since.
Beyond the 90s, even. The Tom Clancy movie The Sum Of All Fears changed the villains from Islamic terrorists to neo-Nazis, and boy was Clancy pissed off about it, spending most of his time on the DVD commentary bitching about how Hollywood had ruined his book. That came out in mid-2002, though had probably been filmed before 9/11.

Timecop was dopey fun from the days when even third-division chunkheads like Van Damme and Seagal had decent amounts of resources put behind them. I miss the days of "high concept" action cinema.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

X-Ray Pecs posted:

It’s that very specific balance where the good Indys and Lethal Weapon 1 (haven’t seen the rest so I can’t comment) are chock full of jokes, but they’re written and edited in such a way that it never feels like the jokes are slowing down the action scenes, and instead add to the rhythm and conflict of the scenes.
That's a problem I have with way too many recent-ish action movies (Indy 4 included), where scenes all but stop for a "joke" as if everyone involved was expecting applause from a live audience. If you've got a hopefully exciting action sequence on the go, don't loving pause it for a lovely wisecrack!

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

There was a TV show from the early 80s created by Donald P. Bellisario (I think it was his first follow-up to Magnum P.I.) called Tales of the Gold Monkey which aimed to cash in on the popularity of Raiders. From what I understand, it was a live-action version of TaleSpin with humans instead of Jungle Book characters. I've never seen it but it's been on my list for a while.
I remember Tales of the Gold Monkey, and yes, it was exactly what you'd expect a TV ripoff of Raiders to be like. The two-fisted loveable rogue hero owned a seaplane, which let him get into all kinds of scrapes in (I think) the 1930s Far East as people hired him to fly them around looking for hidden treasure and the like. The titular Gold Monkey was the bar he used as a base, but was also a Macguffin everyone was looking for in the pilot episode (that turned out not to be in a lost temple, but was the lost temple). It was a fairly fun show.

It's also a bit problematic now as the star (Stephen Collins) has been exposed as a paedophile.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
I now can't read the name Wild Wild West without mentally prefixing it with "a wicky wicky". God drat you, Will Smith.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Halloween Jack posted:

I'm hard-pressed to think of many big-budget action movies worse than Wild West West. Battlefield Earth, I suppose, but even Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever has more so-bad-it's-good, or at least holy-poo poo-they-did-that, moments. Wild West West just makes everyone in it look bad..
All I can remember about Ecks Vs Sever now is that it was incredibly loving boring. The action was so slow and leaden that there wasn't a single even vaguely exciting moment in the whole thing.

Banderas should stay away from movies where he plays an assassin fighting another assassin, because he's zero for two.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Hat Thoughts posted:

Here's the scene for anyone curious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybglNbRQXf0&t=168s
(around 2:45 if it doesn't automatically go there)
Christ, didn't anyone tell the director "The Matrix was three years ago, man! Move on!"

That's why I remembered it as being boring - there's so much slo-mo that the scene moves like treacle.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

X-Ray Pecs posted:

I feel the same way, action films celebrate and glorify violence for the entertainment of the audience. Applying that same genre descriptor to something like Saving Private Ryan’s Omaha Beach scene weirds me out. Now something ahistorical and cartoony as Where Eagles Dare, I have no problem calling that an action movie, but a film based on real events where people actually died can’t really glorify that death for me.
I'm honestly surprised that there hasn't been a remake of Where Eagles Dare yet. (Although it'd annoy me if they did, because it's one of my favourite movies and I have no doubts they'd screw it up.)

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Basebf555 posted:

Yea I guess like any other genre a discussion like this is going to really depend on the definition you're working with. Raiders of the Lost Ark didn't come immediately to my mind because I think of it more as an adventure film, but it's action scenes are all time great and I can't really argue with someone who wants to label it as action. Same with westerns, or samurai films. I tend to lump them all together in their own category, but some are more action oriented than others.
If I was going to pick one thing as 'the greatest action scene of all time', it would be the Raiders truck chase. It's eight minutes of a filmmaker (and the second unit, and stuntmen, and editor, and composer, and and and...) at the absolute top of their game.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

I understand its origins are that Stallone was offered Beverly Hills Cop but didn't like the script, so he rewrote it to remove all the humour/make all the humour really bad, then departed from the project and used his rewrite as the basis for Tango and Cash. It's exactly like "What if Lethal Weapon but not funny or charming?" :(
Can't remember which book it was in, but I once read a quote from someone saying that Stallone's version of Beverly Hills Cop was basically "he shoots lots of people with a special gun". Oh hi, Cobra.

He renamed Axel Foley to Axel Cobretti, as well.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
On a sidenote, watching a load of awesome Jackie Chan fight scenes led me by the wonder of YouTube algorithms to the T-1000/young T-800/old T-800 fight from Terminator Genisys (my phone's autocorrect loving hated that last word), and god drat, the CG was weightless and lovely. I know it's almost a lame old-man cliche to criticise CGI, but the acid-damaged T-1000 looked like Gumby, and having the endoskeleton flail around like a skip-framed ninja did the exact opposite of making it more scary. Why are there so few directors able to go "y'know, heavy stuff has momentum. We should maybe simulate that?"

Also :lol: at them burning every scrap of flesh from the 'young' T-800 in about five seconds flat so they didn't have to spend any more time and money on their CG Arnold.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
M:I1 is more about tension and suspense until the finale on the train, which actually stands up really well even today because A: DePalma knows what he's doing, and B: it was heavily dependent on CGI at a time when ILM had to work really hard just to make the shots possible (as in T2, Jurassic Park and the other early, ground-breaking stuff they did in CG), so put in a massive amount of effort to polish them. I'll brush over that as a fan of the original show making Phelps the loving villain rather pissed me off at the time.

M:I2 is overlong and if anything too Woo, almost to the point of self-parody, but hey, it's still John Woo cutting loose with a mega-budget. And Cruise had a real knife less than an inch from his eyeball (on a safety wire, but I sure as hell wouldn't chance it).

M:I3... eh. Everyone has different tastes, and I just didn't like it. You could tell JJ Abrams was coming from TV even if you didn't know anything about him - the action is too small, for want of a better word. It's also a precursor to a style of modern storytelling that as a writer I loving despise: the 'mystery box'. A Macguffin is one thing, but hanging your entire movie on something that the hero never learns what it is, the audience never does either, and the writer/director never bothered to think up because he thought it would be oh-so-clever to keep it hidden is lazy and insulting.

M:I4 - if I didn't like the first one so much, this would be the best of the series. As a former animation director, Brad Bird basically treated his action sequences as if they were being planned down to the frame, and it works fantastically. It's not until the very end that it starts to feel like cartoony overkill, but the ride to that point has been so much fun that he gets away with it.

M:I5 is... just sort of there. I honestly can't remember too much about it, except that the gag where Cruise and Pegg's car keeps flipping over and over and over went on way too long, without going all the way around to the other side like Sideshow Bob stepping on the rakes.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Fart City posted:

There is a scene at the end of Batman Begins where Batman fights a group of ninjas, and it is so utterly impossible to follow that I wouldn’t be surprised if Nolan handed the camera to an amature skate video director.
I remember getting quite annoyed in the cinema during the BB dockyard fight because I couldn't work out what the gently caress I was supposed to be looking at - it didn't flow at all. I was genuinely surprised later to find people defending it as "it's from the POV of the bad guys, they don't know what's happening either!" Seemed to me more that Nolan suddenly realised "poo poo, my lead actor is all but immobile in this thick rubber suit! Maybe if I just do rapid cuts on closeups of fists and feet and people flying into boxes it'll work... oh, cock."

Also, Batman fought ninjas at the end of that movie? Christ, I must have excised the second half from my mind, because I don't remember that at all. And I own it! I've watched it on DVD more than once!

Actually, a problem I had with all Nolan's Bat-films is that they were all so loving sterile. It's summed up by an early scene in the last one where Gordon and co are going down a manhole in an alley - except the alley looks like it's just been scrubbed and steam-cleaned, with no dirt or garbage or anything to suggest this is a bad part of town. Gotham became a bland concrete and steel Anywheresville, USA.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Die Hard was based on a novel, Nothing Lasts Forever, that was a sequel to The Detective (filmed with Frank Sinatra). Sinatra turned it down, which led to it becoming a standalone movie, although for a brief period it was considered as the basis for Commando 2.

Die Hard 2 was based on a completely unrelated novel by a different author, 58 Minutes. Beyond the basic 'bad guys take over an airport' idea, the final movie doesn't have much in common - unlike Die Hard, which follows NLF so closely at times that the script is basically transcription.

Die Hard 3 was a spec script, Simon Says, that was McClaneised. Die Hard 4 was, bizarrely, based on an article in Wired about cyber-warfare.

Die Hard 5 was the first time a script was specifically written as a Die Hard movie... and was a pile of poo poo with literally no redeeming features.

BTW, I know a writer who was commissioned to work on a Die Hard 6 draft - his brief was "only have Bruce Willis in a framing story, because it's about young John McClane's first big case." He thought that was a poo poo idea, but still took it because, y'know, money.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Jan 17, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Lifeforce is just... a hell of a thing. Where else could you see Patrick Stewart be possessed by a naked space vampire lady, vomit out gallons of blood and then explode? Fun fact: they had to redesign and reshoot the alien spaceship halfway through production, because it looked so much like an umbrella that everyone who saw it started humming 'Singing in the Rain'.

What, someone's planning a new version of The Avengers? Historically that's never gone well, and I'm not just talking about the :wtc: Fiennes/Thurman/Connery movie. The people who made the original show couldn't even restart it successfully after only about six years. It was so of its time that either you end up just parroting what's already been done without understanding why it worked (as per the movie), or you 'update' it (as per The New Avengers) and change it so much it ceases to be The Avengers at all. I actually kind of like some of TNA, but the Cold War spy stuff and the gritty Sweeney/proto-Professionals action really doesn't fit with what they seemed to be aiming for at all.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

As noted, Shane Black and Fred Dekker apparently want to do it for TV as a mid-60s Swinging London period piece.

Personally, I'm waiting for the XYY Man/Strangers/Bulman Shared Cinematic Universe. :v:
Not really a thing for this thread, but an ITC/ATV shared universe would be pretty cool. (As a sidenote, couldn't help noticing that one of the US networks has just announced a show that is literally Randall & Hopkirk (Deceased) with the names changed.)

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Incidentally, any Silence/Lecter who hasn't seen the Hannibal TV series really ought to. It sounded like a disaster in the making - "Let's retell all the Hannibal novels for television, but without Clarice Starling because we couldn't get the rights!" - but turned out good-to-great. Overall, I'd rate Mads Mikkelson a better Hannibal than Hopkins; he's more insidious, charming on the surface but a merciless, calculating monster beneath. Seeing him work as a shrink who's superficially helping his patients but is actually gradually tearing them apart psychologically purely for his own sadistic amusement is an aspect barely touched on in the films.

Bringing this back around to the subject of action movies, it was surprising that the TV series was if anything more gory and violent than Silence, which at the time was considered utterly shocking and horrific. Now we get graphic autopsies over dinner thanks to CSI and the like, while movies seem to have gone the other way so they can get that financially beneficial PG-13 rating. Granted I haven't seen many new films in the past few years due to having a kid, but the days of visceral violence in big action movies - the first two Die Hards and Lethal Weapons, Paul Verhoeven's Hollywood oeuvre, stuff like Commando and Cliffhanger and Under Siege 2 - seem to be long gone. Dredd was the last time I remember coming out of a cinema thinking "gently caress, that was pretty intense." (Things like the church scene in Kingsman, while fun, are more cartoony and piss-takey than anything.)

Can anyone recommend something recent (and good) that would satisfy my itch for some 80s/90s-style squib-and-bloodbag action, preferably with a lone hero facing a small army of bad guys?

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Well, I think a big part of the character is the self doubt and the making mistakes. Him screaming "come the gently caress down here and arrest me!" and "I'll kiss your fuckin' dalmatian!" really sells the idea that he's in WAY over his head, this is not your Arnie/Stallone macho action guy.

And of course everything he says before the fire hose scene.
Which is why the current idea for Die Hard 6 being a "young John McClane's first big explosive adventure!" story is so loving terrible. Yes, McClane's a New York cop and probably a pretty good one who's handled a fair amount of trouble, but everything he does in the first movie makes it 100% clear that dealing with murderous international terrorists is way beyond his experience.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Yeah one of the smartest things about Die Hard is they find like 10 ways to convey an idea. McClane isn't just out of his depth, the poor fucker isn't even wearing shoes!
Yet by DH5 he's just casually throwing himself off tall buildings and expecting to survive. God, that film was a pile of poo poo.

"I'm on vacation!" is the catchphrase of the man who went to Moscow to watch his son be put on trial for murder. :fuckoff:

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Snowman_McK posted:

The extended car chase is pretty cool, but it's wrapped in an awful movie.
I just now rewatched that chase.

It's utterly numbing, because it doesn't build in intensity as it progresses - it's just full-on SMASH SMASH SMASH from start to finish, with really obnoxious shaky-cam that, unlike how Paul Greengrass used it in the Bourne films, doesn't lead the eye to what you're supposed to be looking at from shot to shot but instead fills the screen with tons of slate-grey clutter.

I also discovered from a related video that a surprising amount of it was either entirely CG or pretty much everything on screen bar a couple of vehicles was digital. Which means it was designed to be that lovely and confusing.

And McClane is in a truck which barrel-rolls four or five times as it crashes - then he gets out with barely a scratch, is hit by a car, steals someone else's SUV and carries on the chase, ending up deliberately crashing and rolling again without giving a poo poo. It's not the sequel to Unbreakable, for gently caress's sake.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Feb 1, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
I kind of liked the sheer balls of dismissing Neo's transcendence in Reloaded with the line "Huh, upgrades" before getting back to the kung-fu.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

I suppose there's always Michael Bay. :v:
Bay's an oddball because he's done one genuinely all-round good action movie (The Rock), and both Bad Boys were solid during the actual action sequences, but he just can't stop himself from bloating things out with stupid, pointless, irrelevant poo poo because it appeals to his Beavisian sense of humour. The first Transformers actually had some pretty decent action, but the movie as a whole could have been at least half an hour shorter - and undoubtedly better - if he'd restrained himself when the robots weren't on screen (and sometimes when they were; pissing scene, anyone?)

But his movies have made a quadrillion dollars even with all the screaming comic relief characters and pee-pee jokes, so what do I know?

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
The Rock had a huge number of uncredited writers and script-polishers, as well as having Bay's fairly obvious fingerprints all over the minor characters, and was IIRC Don Simpson's last hands-on project before his OD. So it's amazing it works at all, never mind as well as it does. (Mind you, Simpson was obsessive about story in a way that Bruckheimer never was - in early drafts Ed Harris's character was a straight-up villain holding the city hostage purely for money, and it was Simpson who gave him a more sympathetic motivation.)

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Penpal posted:

Is Air Force One more an action or thriller? I haven't seen it and if it's Die Hard on a plane I'll watch it tonight. I could care less if it's good or not, I only just realised it's flown under my radar
Harrison Ford kicks the bad guy out of AF1 to his death with a one-liner. And there's an obvious allusion to Escape From New York with the presidential escape pod. It's an action movie.

Oh, man, that last shot of the 747. Not-quite-there-yet CGI right at the climax of the movie, you gotta love it!

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

It's kind of like how Speed has two climaxes because they can't get off the bus and beat Dennis Hopper at the same time.
Speed 2 had to one-up that and have three climaxes! First they stop the ship from crashing into the oil tanker and killing everyone aboard. Then the ship crashes into a town, because that was literally DeBont's dream and dammit, he was going to crash a ship into a town even if it cost a full quarter of the budget. Then there's a chase and Willem Dafoe gets killed when Chekhov's oil tanker blows up anyway.

It's a bad film, but in retrospect I think it could have been saved if they hadn't been so goddamn lazy. If Keanu Reeves backs out, then don't just do a find & replace of 'Jack' to 'Alex' throughout the script and add maybe two lines for Annie that they broke up. Instead of Alex being a Jack clone (they're in the same SWAT team! How could Annie not know what he did for a living?), maybe make him a traffic cop or a Santa Monica cycle patrolman or a lifeguard - something where he feels like he doesn't match up to Annie's superheroic ex, and has to step up to the challenge and prove himself through the film. Bam, character arc, done.

As for the rest of the movie, I once edited the ship crash in iMovie to get rid of most of the comedy moments. Funnily enough, the scene's excitement rises in inverse proportion to the number of wacky sight gags and cast members saying "Oh poo poo." There are some thrills there, but DeBont did a Bay and smothered them under jokes.

Mancina's score is probably the best thing about the film as it stands. It got chopped up on screen, but 'Escape' is a brilliant action track - I often play it when I'm writing to pump me up.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 09:05 on Feb 11, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

CelticPredator posted:

Mencia’s scores in general seriously kick rear end. Every time I go to Florida to visit my folks, I blast the Bad Boys theme the moment I get off the plane. It’s dope.
I was honestly disappointed that Mancina didn't come back for Bad Boys 2. The original's score had, y'know, themes and motifs and stuff. All I can remember from BB2 was a wall of noise and grunting guitar licks.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Megaman's Jockstrap posted:

Accident Man review:

If all VoD releases were this good I would be a happy man. This is a breezy, somewhat tongue-and-cheek action movie about a hitman who works for a firm setting up people's murders as "accidents". After his ex-girlfriend dies he decides to investigate her death and gets into some poo poo. There's a passing similarity to John Wick in that there's a hitman pub where all the hitmen gather but it's based on a comic from 1991 (and I'm sure that similarity helped it get funded).
I've been interested in this for a while, because I remember the comic (from the short-lived British anthology Toxic!) as good, warped fun. I'll definitely have to check it out when I get the chance.

Bit of info: Accident Man the comic was written by Pat Mills, who was the creator of 2000AD and (as editor, so he went uncredited because he's heavily into creators' rights) was hugely involved in the genesis of Judge Dredd. For some reason - probably because of Mills's massive anti-authoritarian, anti-capitalist, anti-religion, pro-class warfare streak that runs about a tenth of a millimetre beneath the surface of all his work - nobody's filmed any of his literally dozens of other series. But because of Accident Man, a couple of days ago somebody on Twitter suggested that Duncan Jones (Warcraft) would be perfect for a movie of Mills' ultraviolent Celtic barbarian character Slaine. Jones himself read this, contacted Mills saying "holy poo poo, are the rights to Slaine available?", and when Mills said yes Jones got right back to him with an 'I'll be in touch' message. So that could be interesting.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Neo Rasa posted:

Daylights and License both have a some legit awesome stunts involving planes too.

The plane fight in TLD was the first time watching a Bond film in the cinema that I felt genuinely on the edge of my seat.

The Bond films are a bit weird in retrospect, because they're action movies where a lot of the time the action is pretty pedestrian. There are plenty of cases of someone doing their own version of Bond that's actually more exciting than the real thing: Spielberg with Raiders or Cameron with True Lies, for example. Martin Campbell is the only Bond director who really tried to amp things up throughout - the fight between Bond and Trevelyan in Goldeneye was another of the few edge-of-seat sequences from the entire series.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
I think I said it upthread, but I'll reiterate my opinion that the Raiders truck chase is still the single greatest action sequence ever filmed. It's seven minutes long, but it's a mini-movie in its own right: not a shot is wasted, it constantly escalates and continually tops itself, the peril Indy is in keeps rising - and bar one miniature and one matte shot, it was all done for real. The stunts, the camerawork, the sound effects, the editing, the music... it's pretty much perfect.

Hell, I'm going to watch it again right now just because I can.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Narzack posted:

I think I agree. I can't think of anything that tops it.
Having rewatched the Raiders truck chase like I said I would, there's one more thing making it great that I can't believe I forgot to mention: Harrison loving Ford.

He doesn't have a word of dialogue after "I don't know, I'm making this up as I go", just grunts and gasps and little "nrruh" noises. His acting is entirely physical, but it's great - everything is conveyed by his expression. He starts out frantic, begins to get into the thrill of the chase once he gains control of the truck, gets cocky - and is then shot. After that, it's all rising desperation and panic and sheer Nazi-hating fury until he finally wins out. It's brilliant, and again it tells a mini-story by itself.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
Incidentally, if you want some old-school automotive destruction on a Michael Bay scale, check out the German TV series Cobra 11 (random collection of spectacular crashes here ). The show's been running for ages, is now literally made by the stunt team, and has had some genuinely movie-level stuntwork and explosions. I can't find the clip (they're pretty proactive about taking them down), but I saw one where they tried to recreate the Golden Gun corkscrew jump with an 18-wheeler, and drat near succeeded.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Mar 8, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Snowman_McK posted:

True Lies is a really good, cartoonish action movie that history and politics make kind of vile retroactively. Like, it's not a serious movie about terrorism at all (the terrorists in the movie don't actually kill anyone in the whole movie) but, with how the world has gone since 2001, it's a little harder to watch.
I interviewed Cameron circa 2003, and talking about True Lies, he admitted that post-9/11, the entire premise of an action-comedy about Islamic terrorists attacking America was problematic. His exact words: "That's not funny!"

(He was great to interview, BTW. It was meant to be 45 minutes, but we ended up talking for 90 because we started geeking out about technical stuff and submarines. I wish he'd do more movies, and I don't just mean 27 Avatar sequels, because he's still one of - if not the - best action directors ever.)

Wandle Cax posted:

Also the raid 2 is great but the car chase is probably the weakest of the action scenes
I remember being really impressed by the shock-value speed and brutality of Liam Neeson loving people up in Taken, then the film decided it had to throw in a thoroughly underwhelming and annoyingly-shot car chase.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 08:57 on Mar 10, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Narzack posted:

I mean, the first Bourne was okay, because, though it wasn't great camerawork and editing, enough room was given that Damon could show off the moves he was actually doing. Compare that to Supremacy and Greengrass' spastic camera and editing, where you can't see poo poo. You just have to hope and trust that something cool is happening on screen. Totally frustrating.
I disagree here; I find Supremacy and Ultimatum two cases where shakycam is actually used well. The camera is always moving and the cuts are fast, but everything is framed so that the viewer can tell what they're supposed to be looking at in each shot. I never had any trouble following what was happening even on first viewing in the cinema. YMMV, clearly.

Something I find way more obnoxious is shutter-fuckery to give a strobing, no-motion-blur effect, as popularised by Ryan and Gladiator. Thankfully the fad seems to have passed, but there was a period when action sequences all looked like second-rate stop motion. Combine with shakycam and Bay-style choppy editing and you get a recipe for nausea.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

muscles like this! posted:

Its a weird movie because at times it feels like a science fiction movie what with all the stuff about genetic engineering. Probably the biggest issue with the movie is that the plot comes to what is basically the end but then the movie continues for another 15 or so minutes with another action scene that feels completely pointless.
Yeah, it's got a weird feeling because while the main Bourne films are about a guy who's been trained to the limit to be a top assassin, Legacy is more like the 'super-soldiers' arc from the later seasons of The X Files, with characters who are literally superhuman in their abilities. Considering that the Damon Bourne films are pretty grounded or at least allow easy suspension of disbelief (until that loving ridiculous Vegas chase in Jason Bourne where cars are flying in all directions and the collateral bodycount must have been in three figures), it's a bizarre angle to take.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

I haven't seen any Bourne movies
Correct that ASAP. It's worth it.

In hindsight, it's weird now just how much of an underdog Identity was; "Good Will Hunting as an action hero? Directed by the Go guy? With a ton of reshoots? Whoop whoop, bad movie alert!" Yet it turned out to start probably the defining action series of the '00s.

Rewatching Identity, it's striking that even though Bourne is obviously troubled, he's also charming, talkative and almost goofy at times. Compare that to the taciturn grieving rear end-kicking machine later on, which was taken to a ridiculous extreme in Jason Bourne, where he's about as chatty as the Terminator from T1.

Small Strange Bird fucked around with this message at 09:10 on Mar 14, 2018

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Wheat Loaf posted:

The one I always see is Brendan Fraser.
There was a big piece in (I think) Vanity Fair recently interviewing Fraser, and he talks about being sexually harassed by some important guy from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (the Golden Globes lot) in much the same way that Terry Crews was by a powerful agent more recently, and is certain that trying to kick up a stink about it got him shuffled off the A-list. Well worth a read.

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
At one point Arnold is thrown out of a plane without a parachute. He not only manages to obtain one during the fall, but takes on the plane with a handgun as it comes back to finish him off.

And yes, railguns. Arnold dual-wields railguns.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!
The Lambert/Rhona Mitra Beowulf, Warlock and Space Truckers: three movies I'm pretty sure I've seen, but am damned if I can remember more than the odd tiny snippet about. (I think Space Truckers used NASA stock footage of a shuttle launch for its future spaceship taking off, which is a cheap/lazy bugbear of mine.)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply