|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:wouldn't linux software raid with regular scrubbing be good enough? it's that time thing again
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 08:44 |
|
|
crashplan is phasing out their consumer segment so now I need to find some other cloud service that I can support a synology with a local app
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:08
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:crashplan is phasing out their consumer segment so now I need to find some other cloud service that I can support a synology with a local app i'm probably gonna go tarsnap because i don't use windows at home and the pricing seems sustainable
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:i'm probably gonna go tarsnap because i don't use windows at home and the pricing seems sustainable My plan is to just dump a windows backup to the smb share and let it get captured and replicated up from there because ~who cares~ Crashplan client was nice though
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:My plan is to just dump a windows backup to the smb share and let it get captured and replicated up from there because ~who cares~ front door of my building is 4' above sea level so i really want something offsite
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:20
|
|
|
Everyone should replicate somewhere just for fire/flood/tornado/theft risk. But good luck with the ocean swallowing this wretched earth.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:Everyone should replicate somewhere just for fire/flood/tornado/theft risk. But good luck with the ocean swallowing this wretched earth. But on the bright side, despite having lost our tentacle porn we'll all be living it?
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:26
|
|
|
hyper backup to azure/s3/whatever is pretty good
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:27
|
|
|
Thanks Ants posted:hyper backup to azure/s3/whatever is pretty good oooo yeah that looks like a good option. I'm lazy as hell.
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2017 22:29
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:you werent thinking big enough thumpers represent  so loud people made us move it away from the server room door does anyone know what the catch is with crashplan's "please move to our small business offering instead" thing is?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
josh04 posted:thumpers represent it's $10/device/month and you won't be able to do local device-to-device backups with their client any more
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 03:32
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:crashplan is phasing out their consumer segment so now I need to find some other cloud service same. I just want to pay someone money to store my poo poo and be reasonably certain I'll get it back if I need it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
I store my backups on backblaze b2. synology has a native client for it. it's even cheaper than glacier
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
Raere posted:backblaze  
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 04:51
|
|
|
BangersInMyKnickers posted:crashplan is phasing out their consumer segment so now I need to find some other cloud service that I can support a synology with a local app install an iSCSI initiator and use your Synology as raw block storage since it'll look like a local disk you can back it up with Backblaze also there's an open source iSCSI initiator for Mac on Github now
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:31
|
|
|
guess you should install openSUSE! https://www.suse.com/communities/blog/butter-bei-die-fische/
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:37
|
|
|
i have a synology 2 bay thing, it works fine and it lets me use it as web downloads for factories in china that can't use google drive, dropbox, asana, wetransfer or literally anything you have ever heard of, or FTPs. and i can run plex on it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 08:46
|
|
|
eschaton posted:install an iSCSI initiator and use your Synology as raw block storage lmbo gently caress luns
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 18:49
|
|
|
lol just backup the 500 gigs or so of actual important to keep material (photos, documents, etc) and then a list of all of your legitimate music, tv, and movies so that you be sure to redownload them if something happens
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
all of you synology posters, how easy is it to upgrade the storage in one? I mean after it's already full of data
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 19:53
|
|
|
pretty trivial and you can mix and match drive capacities with the custom raid thing they're doing https://www.synology.com/en-us/knowledgebase/DSM/tutorial/Storage/What_is_Synology_Hybrid_RAID_SHR
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
The Management posted:all of you synology posters, how easy is it to upgrade the storage in one? I mean after it's already full of data idk i have a 12 bay because i am maximum aspergers incarnate
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
i have an old 2 bay synology and i'm thinking of getting a new 4 or 5 bay one, which means i'll probably get around to it in like 6 months
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Helianthus Annuus posted:underrated who underrates illmatic
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2017 01:26
|
|
|
apparently synology isnt very good for multiple 1080p transcode streams with plex and i should be looking at qnap or wd (pr4100) which once is less poo poo ui/security-wise?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 10:04
|
|
|
if you pay for your movies they come in the right format
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 16:53
|
|
|
LUBE UP YOUR BUTT posted:apparently synology isnt very good for multiple 1080p transcode streams with plex and i should be looking at qnap or wd (pr4100) My friend picked up a WD PR4100 and it's okay if you only want to run Plex on it and nothing else. It runs an old version of Busybox so if you want to run anything else the best bet is to run Docker, but it's got a comically old implementation of that running as well. We set the drives up as JBOD because redundancy isn't needed but didn't want to have 1 drive failure hose 40 TB of content, and there's a bunch of weird throughput issues under heavy I/O load, but that could just be Docker fuckery. Plex does support hardware transcoding but I disabled it because like 22% of the time the output looks like complete trash.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
sounds like all these ideas are terrible and you should just sync to google cloud storage or s3 and stop janitoring poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
I copy my important files to a zip disk
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:sounds like all these ideas are terrible and you should just sync to google cloud storage or s3 and stop janitoring poo poo I want to make this happen plz hlp. but I want file system-level access, not some weirdo app interface
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
The Management posted:I want to make this happen plz hlp. but I want file system-level access, not some weirdo app interface are these good? https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse https://github.com/kahing/goofys
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
The Management posted:I want to make this happen plz hlp. but I want file system-level access, not some weirdo app interface unfortunately, the cloud poo poo isnt really there yet these guys are trying: https://mountainduck.io
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 23:41
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:unfortunately, the cloud poo poo isnt really there yet this looks awesome for something else I want to do. I'm gonna start a bad thread about it
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
The Management posted:this looks awesome for something else I want to do. I'm gonna start a bad thread about it 
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2017 00:20
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:unfortunately, the cloud poo poo isnt really there yet ooo that’s neat
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
based on years of cyberduck use im super curious. i used to use it to access and edit files because itd pull on double click, open in an editor, and push on save. it was great for all sorts of stuff so them going the next step to make it act local as a drive is wonderful transmit has transmit disk but 4 has less supported services. 5 is out now but not cross platform and pricier
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2017 01:12
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:unfortunately, the cloud poo poo isnt really there yet lol CyberDuck is that thing written in Java too?
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Asymmetric POSTer posted:sounds like all these ideas are terrible and you should just sync to google cloud storage or s3 and stop janitoring poo poo cloud storage aint there yet, I'm not paying $75 a month for storage
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2017 06:36
|
|
|
bump cause memory lane came on
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 04:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 08:44 |
|
|
thanks yospos, I bought a drobo because it seemed like the one with the least amount of janitoring required. the app to control it is pretty bad but otherwise suiting my needs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 2, 2017 05:43
|
|