|
op: no you don't if you waited this long for it to be "cool" then you are just chasing a trend and you're not up for the math maybe what you actually want is to be able to bullshit sufficiently about these topics to put them on your resume?
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2017 03:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
why? what is your motivation for learning this thing? what if i told you that behind all the fancy math, it is mostly horseshit, and people will move on to the next thing within 5 years or so once all the promises don't pan out?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2017 05:21
|
|
|
qhat posted:Who cares. obviously not you!
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2017 21:30
|
|
|
yeah um ask any phd who focused on "deep learning" and they'll tell you that noooooooooooope
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
fritz posted:non-technical javascript developers please don't remind me about our industry's #1 problem
|
|
#
¿
Aug 23, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
normally wikipedia math is incomprehensible, but the article for singular value decomposition actually seems pretty good. read that, and by "read" i don't mean read the words and skip over the equations like i always do. you have to go through the equations symbol by symbol and make sure you understand what they're saying. when you see a math term whose definition you don't know, click on the term and read that article too, in the same fashion. if the article is too obtuse, look up the term in your linear algebra textbook instead. note that this process will probably have you (re)learn most of linear algebra, but it sounds like that's exactly what you're asking for, and there isn't really any shortcut to it
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 20:50 |
|
|
echinopsis posted:i would spend over a week if i did what you said yeah. math is hard. that's why the classes are like 20 weeks long each
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2017 03:37
|
|