Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Raskolnikov38 posted:

well best of luck to y'all in 2018 since you have 0 interest in doing anything but making GBS threads on the group you want to vote for you

Oh good Ggod that's coming up can we just blast the world into a nuclear hellhole because there's no way in hell that election won't be insufferable as gently caress :cripes:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

RaySmuckles posted:

as for LGBT)

it wasn't obama or the dems that made that happen. it was the courts. LGBT rights are not something i can put in the "win" category for the dems because they didn't do very much to advance it beyond a vague "made it more acceptable." but isn't obama on record opposing gay marriage? i know hillary was. regardless, from my memory obama did not in any way champion gay rights and definitely cannot take responsibility for its success. to me it seemed a much more organic and grass roots movement that arose in states and won over the populace through outlets like the media. maybe i'm wrong, but that's how i remember it. perhaps you're saying that his election alone was a tacit endorsement of the idea, but that seems obtuse at best. once again, i may be wrong, but i really remember that obama was not a leading figure championing gay rights. perhaps you mean more that it was congress, but i would say thats more symptomatic of the ideological shifts of their constituents, a charge that may have been embraced by some in congress, but i wouldn't say they spearheaded it. i openly accept that i may be wrong and would love evidence to the contrary.

Not to mention that trans rights have stalled. The ACA puts protections in that trans-related things can't be denied... if there's federal funds involved, so things from the marketplace and medicare/medicaid/whatever insurance veterans have idk are completely fine, but if you get insurance through an employer, then tough poo poo you play by their rules. And the title IX bathroom things for school only applied for public schools and was only a guideline, so that was reversed immediately. There is the ability to change a passport with a doctor's note saying that everything's good, tho

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

kzin602 posted:

There's more than two girls and there's no cups.

swap.avi demonstrates just how desperate people in poorer parts of the world are for even a small amount of money; if those girls would do that for a pretty small amount, what kind of boutique porn are the Trumps and Cruzes of the world making? I suppose the girls could also be human trafficking victims, making the whole thing even worse.

We already know what porn Cruz would make :v:

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Rappaport posted:

So opiates in tap water?

Don't need a bill for that. Pruitt will just allow dumping of opiates into the water eventually.

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

axeil posted:

Jesus christ.

The Dems (and DSA!) win big last night and instead of celebrating everyone here is still trying to piss in each other's eyes.

Come on guys. :smith:

don't knock our ritual to make the pee tape real

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Motto posted:

My dog is gonna poop on a liberal's lawn and I'm NOT going to pick it up

hello senator Paul

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Condiv posted:

someone in the suckzone bought the audiobook of the donna brazile book, and this excerpt at least seems p funny:


How do you not use Scrooge McDuck what the gently caress

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Nevvy Z posted:

Because the "joke" was "Donald (Trump) ducks releasing his tax returns"

you can still make that joke with Scrooge and get more mileage out of it tho

what a missed opportunity

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

I just feel you can get more out of Scrooge :shrug:

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Lightning Knight posted:

I'm loling at the idea of convincing Silicon Valley investors to pay for their own guillotine executions and feel they got a return on investment.

tie it to a cryptocucryptocurrency or blockchain

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

god forbid you primary the Dem, though. think bout the #resistance and :decorum: and the lesser evil

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Lipinski is being primaried, his challenger is Marie Newman

that's good to know and I hope Marie wins :)

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

the only fbi agents we should care about are Dale Cooper, Gordon Cole, and Albert Rosenfield, imo

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Ague Proof posted:

The Inventor of the E-Mail (TM) running against Elizabeth Warren is selling Groyper* campaign pins.

https://twitter.com/va_shiva/status/999620976403992577

$75

*The meme frog they had to use after Matt Furie started suing Pepes

my favorite part about that is it's just pepe, but morbidly obese

way to work that meme magic, guys :allears:

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

that's just not civil tho

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PenguinKnight
Apr 6, 2009

Kilroy posted:

A neoliberal genie would definitely be the kind who technically fulfilled your wishes in the worst and most cruel way possible. That's the joke. JFC :ughh:

so its a regular genie, then

  • Locked thread