|
Shaggar posted:that's not ntfs tho. that's the software raid controller which sits below ntfs. yeah but the uh well gently caress  I guess it's windows that is bad then 
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
z/os file system
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 05:37
|
|
|
RISCy Business posted:you, stupid and misinformed: *throws 10 disks into a raidz1 and calls it a day* splain the difference for those of us that aren't disk janitors. I mean I get that one is a raid over all the disks and the other is a single volume of mirror devices. zfs isn't going to do 9 block parity, is it? or is it just that the io pattern is crazy on ten drives in raidz?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 05:44
|
|
|
The Management posted:splain the difference for those of us that aren't disk janitors. there's actually a really good writeup about why you should do mirror vdevs instead of raidz: http://jrs-s.net/2015/02/06/zfs-you-should-use-mirror-vdevs-not-raidz/ basically what it boils down to is "mirror vdevs are more fault tolerant, more efficient, and easier to extend than raidz, don't get greedy and go for usable storage over stability" there's a tl;dr at the bottom: quote:don’t be greedy. 50% storage efficiency is plenty.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
exfat doesnt work on my tv but ntfs does
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
[quote="“Sagebrush”" post="“476839283”"] i like exFAT, i guess [/quote] I was writing a universal FAT driver for Nintendo DS a while ago... even figured out how to use DLDI patches but I lost time and/or interest before I got past reading the partition table
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
can we stop talking about filesystems that suck (i.e. everything that isn't zfs)
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
goose willis posted:Reiser partitioned his wife Poopernickel posted:and got raided
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 15:50
|
|
|
goose willis posted:Reiser partitioned his wife And distributed her over several trees.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 16:01
|
|
|
http://open-zfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit_2017 someone wanna go and tell me how dRAID is shaping up?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 16:14
|
|
|
actually btrfs owns
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
COACHS SPORT BAR posted:yeah but the I think you'd probably want to do it in hardware tho.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:http://open-zfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit_2017 lol that this warrants a 2 day conference
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
i'm genuinely surprised microsoft hasn't yanked the software RAID out of windows yet
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:43
|
|
|
Farmer Crack-rear end posted:i'm genuinely surprised microsoft hasn't yanked the software RAID out of windows yet well they still need misfeatures to trap dipshits like a college roommate who wanted to run software raid 0
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 20:00
|
|
|
I set up software raid1 with lunix on my work machine so that I can wait on garbage collection on two ssds instead on one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
why would you store your post history on ssds
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 21:10
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:I mean reiserFS seemed very cool and interesting at the time, too bad about the murders, but really what's a little murder if you got a good fs out of it ? microsoft protogon, op
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
NEED MORE MILK posted:actually btrfs owns
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 09:37
|
|
|
if only someone could sit down and make a new stream format with support for file flags, things would be perfect
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 09:39
|
|
|
[quote="“Bloody”" post="“476861221”"] why would you store your post history on ssds [/quote]
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 03:08
|
|
|
usin zfs on my torrent box because its neat and idc if it deletes itself really
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 11:31
|
|
|
carry on then posted:z/os file system z/os has a filesystem but most applications don't really use it the conventional way for applications to access storage is through userspace libraries that talk directly to a disk
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 21:53
|
|
|
Jimmy Carter posted:http://open-zfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit_2017 lol zfs is so dead
i was right to avoid zfs all these years. as soon as opensolaris died, i assumed that oracle would eventually kill the core solaris, and here we are.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:lol zfs is so dead hmmmm... zfs is good
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
RISCy Business posted:hmmmm... zfs was good ftfy
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
poor Sun, SunOS, Solaris, SMF, ZFS if only Jonathan Schwartz hadn't thought he was Steve Jobs with a ponytail what the hell has he even been doing since he shanked Sun?
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
eschaton posted:poor Sun, SunOS, Solaris, SMF, ZFS rolling in his piles of money and laughing
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:lol zfs is so dead This is a lovely thing to gloat over dude.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
NeoHentaiMaster posted:This is a lovely thing to gloat over dude. welcome to yospos, good to see you've been introduced to nbsd
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 06:21
|
|
|
zfs is actually still good. namaste
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 06:25
|
|
|
posting from zfs, i have no opinion.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 15:30
|
|
|
zfs is good, it's good that it's still being worked on by smart people, and it still does some things better than other file systems. the freebsd implementation is excellent and well integrated, illumos is neat but will probably remain niche, and the linux port is getting better but will always be a second class citizen because of license lawyers. also nfs4 acls > posix acls c'mon linus
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
zfs on linux is poop from a butt alternatively: linux is poop from a butt
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 22:40
|
|
|
with apfs, linux now has the worst filesystems out of all the operating systems. truly the least advanced os
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2017 22:50
|
|
|
pram posted:with apfs, linux now has the worst filesystems out of all the operating systems. truly the least advanced os what was wrong with hfs+? seriously, i don't know what was bad about it because when it comes to files systems they all look the same to me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2017 01:46
|
|
|
akadajet posted:what was wrong with hfs+? they still take a slightly cavalier attitude toward data integrity by only checksumming metadata, but it seems like a solid file system from a features standpoint otherwise. I'm curious to read more about it when/if they publish more docs. more likely it'll have to get reverse engineered first
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2017 01:57
|
|
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:no checksums of any kind (data or metadata), not aware of SSD access patterns, no copy on write, no data deduplication, no snapshotting, no sparse files. they basically lifted features from more modern file systems like F2FS, btrfs, and zfs (though certainly not everything) i can see why they didn't want to do full-on data checksumming what with the extra data that would eat up causing headaches and support calls galore from people upgrading. most likely it'll randomly turn up as an opt-in in a few years, if they can be bothered was hfs+ particularly inferior to its contemporaries? i occasionally hear people saying it's worse than ntfs
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2017 02:34
|
|
|
Generic Monk posted:was hfs+ particularly inferior to its contemporaries? i occasionally hear people saying it's worse than ntfs ntfs is pretty antiquated these days too, but MS has managed to slowly bolt features on. it's still missing some more modern ideas, but so is refs last I checked.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2017 02:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 18:41 |
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:z/os has a filesystem but most applications don't really use it this is disturbing, to me
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2017 04:54
|
|