|
Wait so what would happen if the offense fumbled the ball, it bounced into the endzone, and an offensive player illegally batted the ball out of bounds (in, say, a dumb attempt to keep the defense from landing on it for a touchback). Would it be a touchback for the opposing team, or would the illegal bat just be a penalty and replay of the down with the offense maintaining possession?
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2017 22:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
Blarfk posted:Wait so what would happen if the offense fumbled the ball, it bounced into the endzone, and an offensive player illegally batted the ball out of bounds (in, say, a dumb attempt to keep the defense from landing on it for a touchback). If it works like most penalties the worst case scenario applies, so I'd imagine that would be a touchback and change of possession. But I can't recall ever actually seeing this called so who knows?
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
Just ban fumbling forward. The best case for the offense is getting the ball at point of fumble. They are going to review it anyway.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 00:14
|
|
|
All this fumbling talk made me wiki origins of football and in england they'd play a game a couple times a year with one town's boys vs another town (we're talking hundreds of people) and they'd soak the ball in grease to make it more unpredictable, and the goalposts would be the church balcony in each town. It could take a whole day to play and many bones and windows were broken. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 00:35
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:All this fumbling talk made me wiki origins of football and in england they'd play a game a couple times a year with one town's boys vs another town (we're talking hundreds of people) and they'd soak the ball in grease to make it more unpredictable, and the goalposts would be the church balcony in each town. It could take a whole day to play and many bones and windows were broken. Reminds me of Calcio Fiorentino quote:Matches last 50 minutes and are played on a field covered in sand, twice as long as it is wide (approximately 80x40 meters). A white line divides the field into two identical squares, and a goal net runs the width of each end.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:All this fumbling talk made me wiki origins of football and in england they'd play a game a couple times a year with one town's boys vs another town (we're talking hundreds of people) and they'd soak the ball in grease to make it more unpredictable, and the goalposts would be the church balcony in each town. It could take a whole day to play and many bones and windows were broken. pretend I posted the pyramid scene from Dragon Lord here, because Youtube has it blocked from my country (which is the USA but not like anyone recognizes that).
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 01:33
|
|
|
Blarfk posted:Wait so what would happen if the offense fumbled the ball, it bounced into the endzone, and an offensive player illegally batted the ball out of bounds (in, say, a dumb attempt to keep the defense from landing on it for a touchback). Wouldn’t it just result in a safety? It sounds a lot like a scenario that happened a few years ago where Rodgers fumbled into his own end zone and someone else from his team jumped on it which resulted in a safety.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
A part of me feels like if you gently caress up so bad you cough up the rock at the goal line into the end zone your binch rear end shouldn't just get it at the one
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 02:05
|
|
|
Its Rinaldo posted:A part of me feels like if you gently caress up so bad you cough up the rock at the goal line into the end zone your binch rear end shouldn't just get it at the one Hrm, weird, because all of me feels like if you cause a fumble and gently caress up so bad you can’t get possession in the field of play you shouldn’t be awarded with the ball on the 20 yard line.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
HatfulOfHollow posted:Wouldn’t it just result in a safety? It sounds a lot like a scenario that happened a few years ago where Rodgers fumbled into his own end zone and someone else from his team jumped on it which resulted in a safety. The opposing end zone, sorry I didn't make that clear.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 02:25
|
|
|
Honestly giving the possessing team the ball at the one, or even kicking it back out to the opponent's 20, seems like it unfairly benefits the offense. I'm far from the most "that's the way we've always done it" person but the rule has never stood out to me as egregiously dumb or unfair. Comedy option: offense restarts the drive at their own 20 
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/benfennell_nfl/status/920093878476210176 Lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:03
|
|
|
Manoueverable posted:Honestly giving the possessing team the ball at the one, or even kicking it back out to the opponent's 20, seems like it unfairly benefits the offense. I'm far from the most "that's the way we've always done it" person but the rule has never stood out to me as egregiously dumb or unfair. As a Lions fan, gently caress you
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:04
|
|
|
The Glumslinger posted:Reminds me of Calcio Fiorentino I don't get it. The captains and refs are there to prevent fights, but the sport is essentially one big fight? Seems like it would be fun to watch though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:05
|
|
|
I guess they want technical fights, not like eye gouging and biting
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:10
|
|
|
 apparently the kid has cancer "Pierre-Paul dedicated his post-sack celebration to 7-year-old super fan Hayden, who met and taught his moves Friday through the Garden of Dreams Foundation. “You know what? If I get a sack, which I am gonna get a sack, I’m gonna do your dance,” Pierre-Paul said. Hayden joined Pierre-Paul at the Giants facility late last week, where he and the 6-foot-5 veteran bonded at practice. During the visit, Pierre-Paul gifted his biggest supporter with his gloves, specialized to fit his fingers following a July 2015 fireworks accident. Hayden revealed he lost toes amid his cancer battle. “Got three for my boy Hayden tonight and I did his dance, keep fighting buddy. #90PowerCircle,” Pierre-Paul wrote on Instagram." https://i.imgur.com/ztYQB6c.gifv
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
Who was the Ravens WR that was TKO'd when trying to make a catch but an interception happened? Did he die?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:31
|
|
|
Acebuckeye13 posted:As a Lions fan, gently caress you I already apologized to Lions fans earlier today precisely for this topic but I totally understand
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:39
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:Hrm, weird, because all of me feels like if you cause a fumble and gently caress up so bad you can’t get possession in the field of play you shouldn’t be awarded with the ball on the 20 yard line. Defense's job is to stop the offense from getting in the end zone and they did it. Offense job is to get into the end one and they failed. Seems like one team hosed up badly and shouldn't be rewarded with another bite at the apple Acebuckeye13 posted:As a Lions fan, gently caress you  My boy Golden
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:41
|
|
|
Chromatic posted:
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 03:46
|
|
|
Manoueverable posted:Honestly giving the possessing team the ball at the one, or even kicking it back out to the opponent's 20, seems like it unfairly benefits the offense. I'm far from the most "that's the way we've always done it" person but the rule has never stood out to me as egregiously dumb or unfair. So when the offense fumbles out of bounds in any other part of the field the defense should also get possession? Its Rinaldo posted:Defense's job is to stop the offense from getting in the end zone and they did it. Offense job is to get into the end one and they failed. Seems like one team hosed up badly and shouldn't be rewarded with another bite at the apple The entire game of football is based on the idea that the offense get multiple bites at the apple. The defense’s reward is that they prevented a score on that play. Perhaps if they shouldn’t have let the offense get all the way down there if they didn’t want them to get more tries.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:08
|
|
|
HOT TAKE ALERT! I think if a team challenges a call, the timeout should only be taken away if the call on the field is confirmed. Not stands.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:34
|
|
|
The Colts: they're bad
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
The old streak is dead long live the new streak
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:48
|
|
|
The Colts have gone from Suck for Luck to Suck with Chuck
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:49
|
|
|
swickles posted:HOT TAKE ALERT! the ruling in the rules is confirmed. You have lost one idea point and may only discuss one more idea
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
Pagano should be loving fired before he gets to the podium. 21 4th quarter points jesus christ end this nightmare now!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:58
|
|
|
How do Colts fans watch poo poo like that? I find it deeply satisfying because gently caress the Colts, but that kind of performance has to be infuriating to watch. That defense looked like it gave up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 04:58
|
|
|
b0ng posted:How do Colts fans watch poo poo like that? I find it deeply satisfying because gently caress the Colts, but that kind of performance has to be infuriating to watch. That defense looked like it gave up. Cancer should have won.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
b0ng posted:How do Colts fans watch poo poo like that? I find it deeply satisfying because gently caress the Colts, but that kind of performance has to be infuriating to watch. That defense looked like it gave up. They didn't give up, they got gassed. It happens every week because every week the offense completely stalls in the second half and the defense (which actually played pretty well tonight) just can't sustain a high level of play for that much time. As much as Pagano deserves every ounce of blame for every loss because gently caress him, the Colts receivers (and one particularly guilty TE) had some real bad drops tonight, and there were a couple of killer penalties. Those go the other way and the Colts likely win the game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 05:06
|
|
|
YOLOsubmarine posted:So when the offense fumbles out of bounds in any other part of the field the defense should also get possession? YOLOsubmarine posted:The entire game of football is based on the idea that the offense get multiple bites at the apple. The defense’s reward is that they prevented a score on that play. Perhaps if they shouldn’t have let the offense get all the way down there if they didn’t want them to get more tries. Those poor beleaguered offensives. When will the NFL do something to make it easier on them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
The Colts, what is a half time adjustment? Whatever first place in AFC South draft order not like any of these teams gonna win a playoff game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 14:11
|
|
|
How'd Jacoby look?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
WE BEAT THE COLTS HOLY poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
Metapod posted:WE BEAT THE COLTS HOLY poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 15:56
|
|
|
Eli Wiggum posted:not a tall feat First time in like 6 years for them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
That was a weird week of football. Thought we'd top it off with Colts win over the Titans but alas....
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 16:02
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:How'd Jacoby look? He looks fine. Still learning, made one bad mistake in grounding a ball, but had virtually no help from his receivers or coaches. The Titans started to blitz him nonstop and they didn't call any screens or draws or anything to slow it down, so he got pressured a ton and struggled when that happened. But he doesn't turn the ball over and makes good throws when he has time and the receivers actually do their jobs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 16:08
|
|
|
Kalli posted:First time in like 6 years for them. Baby steps
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 17:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 21:44 |
|
|
Eli Wiggum posted:not a tall feat SHUT YO POPCORN CEILING LOOKING rear end UP
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2017 18:06
|
|