Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

paul_soccer10 posted:

MOd approved Toxxing allowed: how long you think until the IDF does this again to gaza for no reason?

which i think still looks like this because the red cross stole all the money or something
probably Summer 2018 i think :toxx:

whenever Netanyahu needs a bump in the polls

that's why they do it: to boost the popularity of Bibi the Mighty, Protector of Israel

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
did the attackers in the hafton zarhum incident ever go to trial? apparently they were indicted two years ago, but I can't find anything since, and moves at the time seemed orchestrated to minimize the consequences anyone might face

in case you don't remember the name, that's the one where an Eritrean man fleeing from a nearby terrorist attack was somehow* mistaken for a second terrorist, shot by a security guard, and then literally beaten to death by a lynch mob on camera while he lay there incapacitated and bleeding out

*it's because he was black

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

not just any black woman, either

a black woman from South Africa

https://twitter.com/DopeSaintJude/status/955345985902972928

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

R. Mute posted:

from the graun article on the protests:

oh just shot in the legs for throwing rocks, that's okay then

oh huh. did the tank shell aim for their legs as well?

yeah, one up-and-coming anti-protest tactic in the IDF over the past few years is to identify people they think are protest leaders or otherwise influential, and then have a sniper shoot them in the legs with live ammo in the middle of the protest. it's gotten very little play in the Western media, though

i imagine the tank shell was probably an intimidation tactic in hopes that they could blunt the expected wave of protests that day. by using overwhelming force against some poor random farmer early enough to make the morning news, they hoped to discourage people from going to the protests by flaunting their willingness to use ruthless and brutal tactics against unarmed civilians for no reason

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

R. Mute posted:

meanwhile the belgian national news network has found out exclusive info that literally no other news network is going with: the farmer they blew up was crossing the border!

probably to terrorise israeli crops

wonder where they got that info, because witnesses said his body was found half a mile from the border

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

quote:

There are fair questions about shooting non-lethally at retreating civilian combatants. It's a huge gray area of international law. 
At best, this is Yosemite Sam-level "dance, varmint" dickery. 
At worst, it's stormtroopers firing in the general direction of C3PO and R2D2.
 

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

That Robot posted:

fixed that for you

you started april fools day two minutes early

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Grondoth posted:

Is there literally any reason for america to support israel?

I mean it. Is sit cause we get to sell them like a million weapons?

there are a lot of reasons, and different people have different reasons. here are some of them

a) it appeals to certain demographics that tend to be concentrated in electorally-important areas, while not really pissing anyone else off. just like US Cuba policy has been driven primarily by the fact that a bunch of Cuban exiles live in a longtime swing state and that no one besides them gave a poo poo either way. American Jews and various flavors of insane evangelical Christian all tend to be very pro-Israel, and they're a lot more numerous than Palestinian-Americans are

b) Cold War bullshit: the US efforts to gain and retain influence in the Middle East ultimately didn't work that well, and most of Israel's Arab neighbors ended up leaning a little more toward the Soviets. so naturally we backed Israel as a counter to that, and now we've been backing them so long that they're an ally and have to be unconditionally supported no matter what

c) anti-Arab and anti-Muslim racism. as a largely Westernized nation that's in constant conflict with the surrounding Arab Muslim countries and is still mostly politically dominated by light-skinned European immigrants, Israel is popular with people who hate Arabs and Muslims. even white supremacists sometimes side with Israel, under the logic that they hate Muslims more than they hate Jews and are perfectly fine with helping the two groups kill each other

d) military-industrial complex. much of US military aid to Israel is either American-made weaponry or grants that can only be spent on American-made weaponry

e) a general US susceptibility to colonialist narratives. since the nature of the US empire was somewhat different from the other big colonial empires of the 20th century, and since we never really went through decolonialization and never really had a reckoning with our colonial history overseas the same way other countries did, the US discourse doesn't really have a familiar context to compare the Israel conflict to

f) Israel has nukes, they wouldn't give up the nukes if we asked nicely, and there's no serious political will to antagonize or pressure them over it. from a nonproliferation point of view, it's probably "safer" to just let Israel be an undisputed regional hegemon and prevent anyone from posing a serious military threat to them so that they'll never have a reason to use nukes

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

paul_soccer10 posted:

That tends to happen when the only hands-on experience your troops have is shooting children in a cage

not true!!!!

they also have experience standing around in public displaying a gun in order to lull the populace into a false sense of security

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Percelus posted:

with republicans still controlling congress, trump as president and if mike pompeo is head diplomat and john bolton is national security advisor it really would be the window of opportunity for bibi to do some heinous poo poo

more heinous than now?

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Israel is already playing the long game of dumping enough toxic waste into Gaza that it becomes unsuitable for human habitation.

jokes on them, turns out pollution doesn't stop at national borders. now gazan wastewater is polluting Israeli desalination plants

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

I can't believe that Palestinians are poisoning the Israelis, something needs to be done!

oh, i see you're familiar with this article, which accuses Hamas of deliberately refusing to treat raw sewage in order to hurt Israeli farmers, and details the efforts of the heroic IDF to block this terrible toxin terrorism

https://unitedwithisrael.org/hamas-water-contamination-threatens-agriculture-in-southern-israel/

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
With the ruling coalition shaky, and the Israeli far right up in arms about a recent Supreme Court order delaying the deportation of African migrants, the Knesset is tossing around proposals for limiting or removing the Israeli Supreme Court's ability to invalidate laws as unconstitutional. The proposals vary - some MKs are pushing to remove the ability altogether, some are saying it should only be possible when all the judges unanimously agree, and some are saying that the Knesset should be able to simply override and invalidate Supreme Court rulings with a supermajority vote or even a regular majority vote. This is pretty bad, since the Supreme Court has been a fairly reliable bastion against the Israeli government's rightward charge.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

ate poo poo on live tv posted:

I don't know how the Israeli system of government works, but if it's anything like America's, presumably the legislator already has the ability to overrule the supreme court claim of "unconstitutionality" by amending the constitution. Which I think is fair, if you want to create a racial apartheid state, it should be clear. Perhaps they could even put something like this in the Israeli constitution "We must secure the existence of our people and the future for Israeli children." With that guiding light, the supreme court won't have any issues with "unconstitutionality."

it's not just the racism stuff

the Supreme Court has also done things like "bar public agencies from openly practicing mandatory gender segregation" and "force the Israeli government to recognize gay marriages conducted in other countries" and "yes, it's legal for a town to not ban businesses from being open on Shabbat" and "hey, that Palestinian has the actual deed to his land along with proof that he bought it, tell the loving settlers to stop trying to steal it"

it's been a huge restraining influence on the Israeli far-right governments, and rather than write every loving right-wing fringe demand into the Basic Law (the Israeli Constitution), they'd rather just pass a law saying "the Knesset can override any Supreme Court ruling with a simple majority vote"

the problem is that Netanyahu's government is entirely dependent on the ultra-conservative fringe parties, so every time they get a bug up their rear end, they can demand that Bibi gives them what they want RIGHT NOW or else they'll collapse his government and force new elections. and Bibi would rather deal with that than make any concessions at all to Arabs or leftists

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Communist Zombie posted:

Can someone explain why the leftist and arab parties wont join up? Is it mutual hatred, one sided animosity, very incompatible goals, or just old bad blood?

One of our Israeli posters would be able to give more accurate info, but from my position as an outside observer, I see a couple of big problems. First, leaning left economically doesn't necessarily mean being pro-Palestinian and being pro-Palestinian doesn't necessarily mean leaning left economically, so it's rare for all the parties that could be called "left" to completely line up ideologically. There's a tendency for non-Israeli observers to see everything in Israeli politics through the lens of Israel-Palestine since that's all the media covers, but there's a number of other political struggles going on in Israeli culture, so it's not uncommon for a party to hold the "left" position on one issue and the "right" position on another.

For example, the biggest left-of-center party is called "Zionist Union", and just as the name implies, it leans Zionist and openly stated just a few months ago that it wouldn't coalition with the Arabs - they're economically center-left and push for solving Israel's massive economic inequality problem, but they still subscribe to Jewish nationalism. Yesh Atid, another party that looks left-of-center on a generic political spectrum, is a pro-business pro-middle-class party whose primary focus is on a prosperous professional class and mostly looks "leftist" because it also pursues secularism and enforcing a division between religion and state; it has no interest in coalitioning with the Arab parties.

There's also the fact that the single Arab party isn't necessarily ideologically stable, since it was formed from the merger of four Arab parties with very different platforms - they all agree on better treatment for Israeli Arabs and Palestinians, but there's a still a lot of internal disagreement on economic and cultural policy, which makes it difficult for the Joint List to come to agreements with other parties.

Second, and more importantly, they just don't quite have enough seats. The right-wing parties hold a majority of the Knesset, and if the government falls then it'll be because one of the far-right parties decided that Netanyahu was too far left for their taste. Even if every nominally-left party banded together, they wouldn't be able to form a majority government. Some polls suggest that might change if elections are held again now, but since the center-left parties refuse to coalition with the Joint List, they'd have to bring some right-wing parties into the coalition and it'd probably not last that long. A couple of the smaller left parties, which are more like what we'd recognize as genuinely left, are willing to team with the Joint List, but they're too small to matter.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Grondoth posted:

Isn't a huge issue around settling is that israel's housing situation is lovely, and the government's solution is to pay for Israelis to colonize the west bank?

That's part of it, but it's just one facet of a larger problem:



In other words, extremely high economic inequality and poverty rates, comparable to the US, while the government has largely stopped spending on the general populace and now directs most of its social spending to settlers, yeshivas, and other subgroups with political power.

The housing problem specifically has a fairly simple cause: over 90% of land in Israel is owned by the central government, which doesn't build housing itself but rather sells it to private developers on a piecemeal basis. This system manages to combine the worst parts of private and public land development plans - the government imposes extremely long approval processes and gives plenty of opportunities for NIMBYs to slow things to a crawl, and then stands by and does nothing when the private developer just builds luxury housing and jacks up the prices. On top of that, the government isn't starting enough construction to keep up with population growth, and what little does get built is immediately snapped up by wealthy investors aiming to take advantage of the rapidly rising prices.

The exception, of course, being the settlements, where developers don't actually have to pay for the land, the government actively subsidizes housing and infrastructure to a much higher degree than in Israel proper, and the government often offers expedited processes and accelerated approval for settlement projects. This all amounts to housing being significantly cheaper in the settlements, thanks in large part to a government policy of actively incentivizing that.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
doop de doo, let's check my RSS feed and see what the new Knesset session is up to...


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/245252 posted:

Nationality Law passes first reading

A bill that would enshrine Israel's Jewish nature into law passed its first Knesset reading on Tuesday by a majority of 64-50.


The bill, which is sponsored by MK Avi Dichter (Likud), will now be sent to a special committee headed by fellow Likud MK Amir Ohana. The bill needs to pass its second and third readings in order to become law.

The bill enshrines the status of the State of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people and the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in its homeland as a unique right for the Jewish people, the symbols of the state, Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and the Hebrew language as the official language.
...
"The State of Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people," said Dichter. "This is a clear fact. But despite everything, after 70 years, unfortunately, it is not clear to everyone and it is certainly is not anchored in any law in the State of Israel.

The bill has been seen as controversial, with opposition MKs contending that passing the law would weaken Israel's non-Jewish minorities. A similar bill in 2014 titled the 'Jewish State Law' failed amidst coalition wrangling.

eh, well, that one was expected. wonder if there's anything else


http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/245256 posted:

A bill allowing jurists to invoke Jewish law during legal battles passed its third and final reading in the Knesset by a vote of 39-32.

The law, which was sponsored by MK Nissan Slomianski (Jewish Home), instructs judges to "turn to the principles of freedom, justice, and peace as espoused by Jewish law in addition to turning to the principles of the Jewish tradition" when current legislation does not provide an adequate answer.

A version of this bill had already been passed as part of the Basic Law: The Judiciary in 1984 but has been sparingly used by Israel's legal system due to its unclear applications.

The bill had aroused controversy from opposition MKs, who alleged that its passage would pave Israel's transformation from a democracy to a state governed solely by Jewish law.

"How can you force a person who does not believe in God, a law that is different from the law of a democratic state, which was not accepted by an elected representative and does not meet the criteria of democracy?" asked MK Meirav Michaeli (Zionist Union).


"In what democratic state could this law be imposed on its citizens" continued Michaeli, who contended that Jewish law "does not recognize equality, not between Jews and non-Jews, and not between men and women".

MK Dov Khenin (Joint List) stated that the real goal of the law "is to change the foundations of the judicial system, to distance the system as much as possible from advanced concepts of democracy and to make the system more nationalist, conservative and religious."

guess the march towards theocracy continues as usual. I'm sure that's all for now, right?


https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Benjamin-Netanyahu/Supreme-Court-president-pleads-with-Netanyahu-not-to-endanger-democracy-553060 posted:

Supreme Court president pleads with Netanyahu not to endanger democracy

The Israeli public believes if the Supreme Court is denied the capacity to strike down laws enacted by the Knesset, there will be no checks on the government and it will have unlimited power.


Supreme Court President Esther Hayut warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked in a two-hour meeting on Sunday that their insistence to limit the power of the Supreme Court could endanger Israeli democracy.

Netanyahu’s Likud and Shaked’s Bayit Yehudi parties support legislation permitting the Knesset to override the court’s decisions to strike down laws with a simple majority of 61 MKs. But Hayut would oppose the bill even if it were to call for a larger special majority to override the court, media reports said.

Bayit Yehudi leader Naftali Bennett, who told The Jerusalem Post that “the bill was the most important decision being made in 25 years,” has threatened Netanyahu’s coalition if the bill is not brought to a vote in Shaked’s Ministerial Committee on Legislation next Sunday.

“There can be dialogue about whether the majority required should be 61 or 65, but more than that negates the point of having an override clause,” Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan said. :siren:“The Knesset passes many laws that help minorities, but it also has the right to advance legislation that helps the majority of citizens.”:siren:

oh, right, that. gotta love Erdan's super dogwhistle quote there, tho. what a Knesset!


https://www.timesofisrael.com/pm-authorized-to-declare-war-in-extreme-situations-without-consulting-cabinet/ posted:

PM authorized to declare war in 'extreme' situations without consulting cabinet

In a surprise and potentially far-reaching victory for Benjamin Netanyahu, the Knesset on Monday evening gave the prime minister the authority to declare war or order a major military operation by consulting only the defense minister, and not via a full cabinet vote as the law had previously required.

Sixty-two Knesset members voted the dramatic proposal into law, beating out the 41 opposition MKs who opposed it claiming that the language of the law effectively gives free reign to the prime minister by removing all oversight.

According to the new law, in “extreme circumstances,” military operations can be authorized by the prime minister and defense minister alone and will not need a vote by cabinet ministers.

The law does not specify exactly what those circumstances may be, or who will determine them, saying only that the case will apply, “if the issue is necessary due to urgency.”
...
Two opposition lawmakers — Zionist Union’s Omer Bar Lev, an IDF reserve officer with the rank of colonel and a former commander of the elite unit Sayeret Matkal, and Yesh Atid’s Ofer Shelah, a company commander in the reserve Paratroopers Brigade who lost an eye during the 1982 Lebanon War — warned the committees that the wording of the new legislation could enable the prime minister to exclude lawmakers who opposed a military operation and to bring such an operation to a vote in their absence.

They also said that allowing the prime minister and defense minister to decide when a situation is considered “extreme circumstances” would give them full power to go to war without any oversight.

who in the gently caress thought giving Benjamin "bibi" Netanyahu unlimited war powers was a good idea:psyduck:

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Willie Tomg posted:

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is a /pol troll persona. that's not your name. nobody's named that. dont give me that fakeass name "Shmuley Boteach" whats your real name you antisemetic fucker

not only is he real, he was Michael Jackson's close friend and spiritual advisor

he ran for Congress in 2012, and has written at least four books about kosher sex

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
Israel claims that iranian forces in Syria fired missiles at Israeli soil yesterday. Iran denies it, Syria says that Iran had no involvement in the attack, and Russia is noncommittal

idk whether it's true or not. on the one hand, it makes sense for Iran to retaliate since Israel's been bombing them for weeks, and their hopes of friendly relations with the West have mostly been scuttled by Bibi. on the other hand, Israel is claiming the supposed Iranian attack had a 100% failure rate, with 20% of the missiles being shot down by Israel's pissrocket interception system and the other 80% just plain missing and landing on Syrian soil. and I always got the impression the Iranian military was more competent than that. also, the attack exactly matches what the IDF has been publicly predicting and warning about for days

well, regardless of all that, Israel conducted more than 50 airstrikes in retaliation, bombing the hell out of Syria, and is calling together the security agencies to talk about further action. also, on what I'm sure is a completely unrelated note, Likud's popularity has abruptly skyrocketed to its highest point in a decade, and there's already calls for the corruption case against Netanyahu to be suspended so that brave Bibi isn't distracted by spurious allegations in this time of security crisis

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Byolante posted:

Could this be a end run to say hamas is working with jamah islamiyah who worked with al qaeda, making hamas actually al qaeda and therefore a legal target via the AUMF?

probably not. Israel doesn't need US help to bomb Gaza

i'd imagine it involves drawing attention away from the Gaza massacres by pointing at TERROR SCIENTISTS halfway across the globe, reinforcing Israel-Phillippines relations, encouraging the Phillippines to buy more Israeli missiles, and pushing other countries to crack down on their pro-Palestine movements because of HAMAS INFILTRATORS

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
it's been discovered that the current US ambassador to Israel was involved in donating $12k to a terrorist group that is on the official government list of illegal terrorist organizations due to its extreme, violent anti-Arabism

https://www.jta.org/2018/05/11/news-opinion/united-states/charity-headed-david-friedman-us-envoy-israel-gave-money-former-terrorist-group

quote:

David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, was president of a non-profit that donated money to a far-right Jewish group designated as a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department.

American Friends of Bet El Yeshiva Center donated 48,000 shekels — about $12,000 — to Qomemiyut in 2013, when Friedman was president of the non-profit, according to a report by the Democratic Bloc, an Israeli NGO that tracks funding for right-wing groups.

The State Department has since 1997 designated Kach as a terrorist group. The most recent State Department list, for 2016, includes “Qomemiyut Movement”, the group’s current name, as an alias for Kahane Chai, an offshoot of Kach. It was similarly listed in 2013, when Friedman’s group made the donation, and a State Department list as early as 1999 includes Qomemiyut..

Qomemiyut in its current iteration was established in 2006, a year after Israel’s government evacuated settlements from the Gaza Strip, to prevent any further evacuations of settlements. Its current CEO, Mussa Cohen, on Friday told JTA that the group is the same group that in the 1990s was affiliated with the Kach movement, founded by the extremist rabbi, Meir Kahane.

The Canadian government in 2016 listed Qomemiyut Movement as a terrorist entity. Mussa Cohen last year told Arutz Sheva, an Israeli news outlet, that he would seek the movement’s removal from the list.

...

Qomemiyut translates as “sovereignty,” but also shares a root in Hebrew with the word “uprising.” Its officers are a who’s who of Israel’s hard right, including Knesset member Betzalel Smotrich, a member of the extreme faction of the Jewish Home Party, and Dov Lior, the former rabbi of Kiryat Arba who has repeatedly been accused of incitement. In 2014, Lior said Jewish law allows for the destruction of the Gaza Strip.

On its Facebook page, Qomemiyut describes its mission as the “strengthening and instilling of the values of the righteousness of the Jewish renewal and preventing the expulsion of the Jews from Judea, Samaria and the Golan Heights.” It has protested on behalf of Israeli Jews accused of incitement and has called on Jewish landlords not to rent to Arabs.

The Democratic Bloc was established recently as part of a counteroffensive by liberal and left-wing NGOs in Israel. There have long been NGOs in Israel that track and report funding sources for left-wing groups.

In 1994, using regulations that previously had been used only against Palestinians, the Israeli government banned the Kach and Kahane Chai political parties for their fiercely anti-Arab rhetoric. Both owed their ideology to the U.S.-born Kahane, who was assassinated in New York in 1990.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/995750216467910658

lol

the city also renamed a nearby public square in Trump's honor

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
https://mobile.twitter.com/LovedayM/status/995989085004197888
https://mobile.twitter.com/joedyke/status/995996799218409472

death count is rising rapidly

and let's not forget that in addition to the deaths, there are tons of people being "non-lethally" shot in the legs, mostly by high-powered sniper rifles. which means a lot of people are being permanently maimed or crippled, and a lot of legs are being amputated. especially since gaza's health infrastructure is in a pretty bad state thanks to the blockade and bombings, and Israel isn't letting any of their victims out of Gaza to seek treatment elsewhere

https://mobile.twitter.com/Mark_Coughlan/status/996002176299225088
https://mobile.twitter.com/JareerKassis/status/992946289062109184

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
though the dead protesters are getting more press time right now, Gaza is also facing another severe humanitarian crisis

the main border crossing for cargo transport into Gaza was severely damaged a couple of days ago, allegedly by rioters who somehow managed to enter the crossing without being shot by the IDF, torched vital equipment for fuel and goods transport, and then left without making any attempt to breach the border

the crossing has essentially been shut down by Israel, which is saying it could take months to repair the damage. in the meantime, gaza's already severe fuel shortage is escalating further. this is a particular concern for critical infrastructure such as hospitals, which rely heavily on diesel generators to deal with the unreliability of Gaza's power generation.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Grondoth posted:

The fact that they have secret nukes that they have a plan that says "we will nuke the whole world if things don't go our way" is nuts

in fairness, the so-called "samson option" probably isn't a real thing

israel definitely has secret nukes and will definitely use them if it ever faces a serious military threat, though

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Neurolimal posted:

So what are democrats saying about the protests so far

i imagine they're conflicted because on one hand palestinians are protesting but on the other hand israel is celebrating a trump move

Bernie and a couple other Dems have condemned Israeli violence. Schumer and a few other Dems have celebrated the embassy move and claimed partial credit for it.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Plutonis posted:

lol i just noticed the embassy move is exactly the same day as the 70 year anniversary of the nakba

that's because they planned the embassy move to happen on the 70 year anniversary of the founding of the modern Israeli state

turns out Israeli Independence Day isn't a day of celebration for everyone

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
protests have died down in Gaza today, likely due to the large number of funerals going on and the fact that Gaza's hospitals are still overwhelmed by the casualties of yesterday's brutality

there's not a lot of details, but I've seen a couple reports that PA officials are refusing to allow some goods through the border crossings. dunno if there'll be more on that, but I wouldn't be too surprised. the PA often colludes with Israel against Hamas

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
when the guy running the PR campaign for whitewashing your atrocities forgets where the line between "acceptable" and "atrocities" is drawn

https://twitter.com/IDFSpokesperson/status/996427205944184832

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
jerusalem's natural history museum covers up the exhibits on evolution and dinosaurs when ultra-Orthodox school groups visit on free trips subsidized by the city of Jerusalem

a modern, progressive Western democracy
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/jerusalem-museum-covers-exhibit-on-evolution-when-haredi-visit-1.6045697

quote:

Jerusalem Museum Covers Exhibit on Evolution, Dinosaurs When ultra-Orthodox Students Visit
Haredi Jewish schools made their visits conditional on the exhibit being covered up, and the museum's educational director decided to agree to their request

The Natural History Museum in Jerusalem covers up an exhibit on evolution and dinosaurs during visits by ultra-Orthodox students. The museum says it only covers one specific exhibit with a curtain when groups from Haredi schools visit, as part of the educational program of the Jerusalem municipality, and when they request to do so in advance.

The permanent exhibit on “the beginning of human evolution and culture” was covered by pink sheet, as reported and photographed by Michael Bachner of the Times of Israel. The exhibit presents the stages of human evolution using illustrations, texts and archeological finds. A visitor who asked about the curtain and then complained when she was told that Haredim do not like to see such things, was told by a museum employee that she could leave, according to the story.

Since the beginning of the school year, 12 groups from Haredi schools have visited the Natural History Museum as part of the city’s “Jerusalem Advantage” educational program. This is the first year such visits to the museum have been subsidized by the city.

The museum’s educational director, Dr. Evgeny Roznitsky, says schools made their visits conditional on the exhibit being covered up, and he decided to agree to their request. “The agreement is that when such a group arrives we close the curtain and the guide does not explain about those parts. When they leave we open the curtain,” he told Haaretz.

“It has happened 12 times and we would be happy for more – before this year there were no Haredi groups at all, only in a few private frameworks. This year groups come from [Haredi] schools in an organized manner, so I still think this is an achievement,” said Roznitsky.

It is preferable to expose the students to the rest of the worlds the museum has to offer than to refuse their request and have them cancel completely, he says. “My dilemma was either not to close [the curtain] and not agree to the request, and then not to receive this public and not to expose them to the beauty of the other exhibits, or to temporarily close something that is 0.3 percent of all the museum’s space and expose them to the rest: The environment, nature, environmental quality. We have animals in the garden zoo, a beautiful garden. These are children who have never seen an animal in their lives. So I expose them to an entire world. So on behalf of pluralism and education I close this curtain,” said Roznitsky. He completely denies that a visitor who criticized the curtain was told she could leave.

Biology Professor Jerry Coyne from the University of Chicago, who specializes in evolution, read about the affair and sent the museum a letter in which he criticized their decision to cover the exhibit. “As an evolutionary biologist of Jewish ancestry, I am deeply offended at your practice of covering up the human evolution exhibit lest it offend the Haredi Jews who go to your museum. Why would a museum hide the truth, even if it’s offensive to some religious believers? Is this proper in a largely secular state like Israel?”

He also published the letter on his blog “Evolution is True.” Coyne called on his readers to send their own letters to the museum. “I hope you realize that by literally hiding the evidence for human evolution, you are misleading people: in effect, lying by omission. The truth is the truth, regardless of whether some people are offended because it goes against their upbringing; and by catering to the false beliefs of creationists, you are, in effect, censoring whatever science that some people find unpleasant. This kind of behavior makes me ashamed of my Jewish background.”

The Jerusalem municipality said: “The city’s Educational Administration initiated the ‘Jerusalem Advantage’ program in which all the city’s students from all communities are entitled to visit a wide variety of museums in the city within the framework of their studies. Within this program, thousands of students visited the Natural History Museum in the city and enjoyed the exhibitions and exhibits there. As opposed to what has been claimed, the aforementioned exhibit is open regularly to all groups visiting the museum.”

The city said that out of a desire to attract groups from the Haredi community, too, it was decided to agree to the request from Haredi schools and cover a specific exhibit during the visits. “So far, 12 groups from Haredi schools have visited the museum. The Educational Administration will continue to make cultural institutions and enrichment activities accessible to all the city’s students from a viewpoint of tolerance and equal opportunity for everyone.”

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Coohoolin posted:

So what's the academic definition of genocide and how applicable is it to what Israel does to Gaza (restricting water, electricity, basic living needs, etc)?

There's no single academic definition of genocide, as it's inherently a fairly subjective thing. The UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which is the closest thing to a widely-accepted legal definition, defines it as follows:

quote:

... any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily harm, or harm to mental health, to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

C lines up pretty well with what's going on in Gaza. However, if you look closely, you'll notice that there's enough wiggle room in the definition for people to nitpick it endlessly, because it's broad and not that detailed or specific. It's probably vague on purpose, to keep things from being bogged down in petty legalities when the world broadly agrees that a genocide is being committed and has the political will to do something about it. On the other hand, that means it's not that useful when the world doesn't see it as genocide or doesn't have the political will to intervene. Though that's basically the problem with international law in general: it mostly exists to lend justification and legitimacy to whatever the major world powers were going to do anyway, and the actual words don't really amount to much on their own.

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman has called for Israel to immediately leave the UN Human Rights Council.

it's unlikely to happen, because Israel was never a member of the Human Rights Council in the first place

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Sisi is very anti-Islamist, a secular dictator who wants to stomp activist religious groups. also, he came to power by overthrowing the Muslim Brotherhood and now heavily oppresses and suppresses them as a potential threat to his rule, and Hamas is descended from the Muslim Brotherhood and retains somewhat close ties with them. so although the Palestinian cause remains popular with the people of Egypt, Sisi's own ideological and political alignments leave him very anti-Hamas

Egypt has long cooperated with Israel on the Gaza border for diplomatic reasons (i.e., to keep that sweet sweet US aid money flowing) but Sisi cranked up the crackdowns and significantly tightened border security once he got into power.

that said, domestic pressure is having an effect on Sisi and seems to have forced him to dial it back a little bit

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
Egypt has a history of brokering truces between Israel and Hamas, especially since Israel doesn't officially recognize Hamas and thus doesn't have direct diplomatic channels with them (though plenty of under-the-table negotiations happen)

It's interesting to see Sisi offering that much of a concession without any apparent direct benefit - he cooperates with Israel on Gaza, but it's an arrangement of mutual gain rather than a master-servant relationship. I don't follow day-to-day Egyptian politics, but either he's getting something from Israel for it or he needs to look pro-Palestinian for domestic reasons

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

having a poe's law moment right now

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

Acknowledging the tragic humanity of this propaganda attempt would just be giving him what he wants.

nah, it's okay, he reportedly said "drat Hamas" while he was burning to death so this'll probably be front page news tomorrow

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Percelus posted:

if you really want baddems and their idiot supporters to take notice the trick is make it mostly about trump moving the embassy to jerusalem because they can't pay attention to anything non trump related for like 1 minute at a time

the bad Dems support it. schumer personally praised trunp for moving the embassy

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010
certainly casts "there's no innocent Gazans because those unarmed kids would all grow up to be anti-Israel soldiers" in a disturbing new light

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Triangle Shirt Factotum posted:

Lol, they'll get smacked into line and told to shut up. IDF is more fascist than Jewish.

the IDF is still handling haredi with ultra kid gloves

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Triangle Shirt Factotum posted:

The ending of the draft exemption is the start of this changing.

call me when they start shooting at the haredi rioters who attempt to literally lynch IDF recruiters in haredi neighborhoods

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply