|
Oakland/Dallas who loving cares
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 00:51 |
|
|
Also I really hope Shazier gets well but this is really annoying and I wish they'd shut up about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:11
|
|
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Reminder, Kawalimus is full on gimmick. Don't spin your wheels. The gimmick is that im a live human. Ill be dead after tonight!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:12
|
|
|
I think it was the right call to wind the clock. But on that play where Maclin got hurt and they called an injury timeout.... I think they should change the rules that if your team is on offense and one of your players is injured on a play where the clock is stopped, it should NOT cost your team a timeout. Why should your team be penalized for one of your players being injured?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:12
|
|
|
DrunkPanda posted:I think it was the right call to wind the clock. But on that play where Maclin got hurt and they called an injury timeout.... I think they should change the rules that if your team is on offense and one of your players is injured on a play where the clock is stopped, it should NOT cost your team a timeout. Why should your team be penalized for one of your players being injured? its to stop people from using them as free timeouts. also the ravens entire season is defined by them being penalized for their players being hurt so its very fitting
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
DrunkPanda posted:I think it was the right call to wind the clock. But on that play where Maclin got hurt and they called an injury timeout.... I think they should change the rules that if your team is on offense and one of your players is injured on a play where the clock is stopped, it should NOT cost your team a timeout. Why should your team be penalized for one of your players being injured? Cause a player can act hurt and stop play then get up and basically give an extra timeout. Its a lovely rule, but sadly necessary cause it will be abused.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:13
|
|
|
now now it doesn't matter that the Ravens put up 38 lame points on the Steelers. the Steelers TORCHED the Ravens for 39!!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:15
|
|
|
oh poo poo i was right about only needing 1 point to win
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
AndrewP posted:now now it doesn't matter that the Ravens put up 38 lame points on the Steelers. the Steelers TORCHED the Ravens for 39!!! We were very strong in the second and third quarters, yes. But thr refs handed us those last 7.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
Im sure there were no steeler touchdowns through a bullshit pass interference
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
No NFL touchdown is untainted by sin.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:26
|
|
|
i'm dumb, can someone explain to me why the clock didn't stop when the ball went out of bounds?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
Mystic Stylez posted:i'm dumb, can someone explain to me why the clock didn't stop when the ball went out of bounds? When it was fumbled forward it was a dead ball before it ever went OOB is what I think the rule is
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
Kawalimus posted:The gimmick is that im a live human. Ill be dead after tonight!! Are you Ryan Shazier
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:34
|
|
|
Mystic Stylez posted:i'm dumb, can someone explain to me why the clock didn't stop when the ball went out of bounds? https://twitter.com/footballzebras/status/940083738112802816 Edit: what Intruder said
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
Mystic Stylez posted:i'm dumb, can someone explain to me why the clock didn't stop when the ball went out of bounds? If it was recovered by the Steelers, it would have been their ball wherever they recovered it, or where they were downed. Once the ball moved past the fumbler (Flacco) if it goes out of bounds, or is recovered by the Ravens, the rule is that it is treated as if the fumbler was simply tackled. The clock winds, because according to rule, it was a tackle in bounds. This rule exists to prevent "Holy Roller" type plays at the ends of games.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:38
|
|
|
thank you guys, I get it now. I knew about a forward fumbling rule but I thought it applied only when it was an intentional one by the offense.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:40
|
|
|
Mystic Stylez posted:thank you guys, I get it now. I knew about that forward fumbling rule but I thought it applied only when it was an intentional one by the offense. The problem is that its hard to determine intent in most scenarios. So having a blanket rule, but having it only apply in end game situations seems to be a fair compromise.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:41
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:None of that matters if the Ravens got the first down on the play I've been referring to this entire time, dingus. You always insult people but get let go because the mods feel bad for you. This is especially tiring in PSP.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:53
|
|
|
Roman Reigns is good and my friend
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:53
|
|
|
Intruder posted:Roman Reigns is good and my friend Dean Ambrose is my hero.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 06:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 8, 2024 00:51 |
|
|
Barreft posted:You always insult people but get let go because the mods feel bad for you. This is especially tiring in PSP. God forbid I call someone a name like dingus. How horrible of me. Also quit with the stalker gimmick.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2017 08:03
|
|