|
My god if he projected any harder he'd be a Zeiss. Also reminder that: quote:In 1980, chief agent John Douglas, working with agents in the FBI's Behavioral Sciences Unit, issued a psychological profile of the unidentified bomber. It described the offender as a man with above-average intelligence and connections to academia. This profile was later refined to characterize the offender as a neo-Luddite holding an academic degree in the hard sciences, but this psychologically based profile was discarded in 1983. An alternative theory was developed by FBI analysts that concentrated on the physical evidence in recovered bomb fragments. In this rival profile, the suspect was characterized as a blue-collar airplane mechanic How isn't it immediately obvious to anyone that this was written by a STEM academic. How could there be any doubt with sentences like "Many leftists are not such rebels as they seem" e: or with the constant relying on "common sense" answers to "soft sciences" questions rather than a shred of reference to any academic work hackbunny has issued a correction as of 23:28 on Jan 29, 2018 |
#
¿
Jan 29, 2018 23:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 20:10 |
|
|
I'm sorry but this is unreadable drivel and the guy's brilliance was seriously oversold. I'm sure it was novel back then but tell me you haven't read a hundred rants just like this, sometimes word for word, on random nerd hobby forums There isn't a single citation for the many bold claims he makes [in fields in which he has zero qualifications], he's just a random shitposter like any of us idiots. His bomb mailing campaign really was just a call for mainstream attention [SOURCE] for my bold claims: takes one to know one hackbunny has issued a correction as of 23:54 on Jan 29, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2018 23:46
|
|
|
Typo posted:remember he's a literal autist He's literally 80s Damore
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2018 23:59
|
|