|
These are not fractals but dumbass woodworkers call them fractals endlessly. I'm setting up a less terrible rig this week to mark some bowls with. Bad tests with a microwave transformer on hard maple - switching to a 9000v, 30ma neon transformer so it won't instantly murder me when I actually have to position the points: 
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2018 22:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 20:42 |
|
|
Sagebrush posted:they are, but horrible nerds who can't define the equation for the pattern get super pissed off I mean they have fractal features, but they don't really fit all the characteristics of a fractal.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2018 19:47
|
|
|
Tom Collins posted:These are fractals, of course they're fractals. They're not rendered down to an infinite number of iterations, but they don't have to be to display self-similarity independent of scale, which is obviously present just by looking at them. Lichtenstein figures similarly use electricity to burn fractals into polymers or glass. I already answered this hours ago you dork. Its got fractal properties, but you can't just remove one of the major features of a proper fractal and still say they are one.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2018 23:14
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:facts about your posts in this thread: 3. Understands normal fuckers will just google it instead of putting that effort into writing bad posts.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2018 13:49
|
|
|
It’s like arguing that this 5x4 rectangle is definitely a square, even though it’s missing core features of a square like having equal sides. You can’t just foo foo away the infinite repeatability bit.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2018 13:50
|
|