|
i made fractals but not in a long time some are 20x20K assembled from a bunch of smaller images
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2018 16:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:that's really cool many thenks i have it on a society6 page along with some others https://society6.com/product/overrun-futurescape_print
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
fractals are pretty useless SO FAR; maybe we just haven’t figured out how to use them like they used fractals for making those antennas to work better. that’s one thing
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2018 16:55
|
|
|
toiletbrush posted:serious post: a dude I worked with used Hilbert curves to do stress tests of memory modules, it found more random issues than any other tests we had that’s cool. i can imagine how that could be effective being so squiggly
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
mystes posted:Please make more. This is seriously cool. thanks i have color ones too but they aren’t as detailed    
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2018 22:47
|
|
|
this video is always a fun and chill journey when im high https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFTeDcJxuXs
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2018 16:26
|
|
|
of course pollock’s work does not intentionally have fractal math integrated into them, and fractal correlations can often be made with random sets of data. this can be said about a lot of paintings though that are not random splatters. also i’ve been seeing a lot of “fractals = self-similar” but this is not what defines a fractal at all and although it comes up often, it’s not required. it can even have a foundation of being self similar, but it can be mutated as it iterates completely making that characteristic invisible
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2018 14:42
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Feb 23, 2018 04:30
|
|
|
moron izzard posted:3. Understands normal fuckers will just google it instead of putting that effort into writing bad posts. disagree. fractals are quite the abstract concept. you can’t explain away fractals in one explanation or equation and it’s very open ended
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2018 18:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 09:12 |
|
|
Doom Mathematic posted:Fractals have the same level of complexity regardless of how far in you zoom. Fractals are "self-similar" in that a small portion of the fractal is very similar in structure or even identical to the whole, at arbitrary levels of magnification. This is basically the entire, fundamental definition of "fractal". Plants and many other natural structures do display self-similarity to some level of magnification, but you don't have to zoom in too far before you hit e.g. individual molecules and atoms, and what do you know, they no longer look like the whole fern frond/leaf back/whatever. So they aren't fractal, they just have a few levels of self-similarity/recursion going on. haha very wrong e: fractals are often used to describe naturally occurring phenomena hth LP0 ON FIRE fucked around with this message at 18:41 on Mar 1, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2018 18:36
|
|