Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Basebf555 posted:

Half the appeal of having a nice movie collection for me is that I can go over the shelf and look at everything and choose something to watch that fits whatever mood I'm in at the moment. If they were all just stuffed in a box it'd be much less practical and satisfying to do that.

I'm copying all my Blu-rays to my computer. I want those discs out of sight and mind.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Big Mean Jerk posted:

Slipcovers make a better presentation for your product, they make spines more vibrant and easier to read on a shelf, and they provide limited protection for the case itself. I can’t believe there are people with strong opinions about them either way.

Tossing all of your cases and cramming the discs into plastic sleeves that you then hide in a larger box is absolutely bonkers, though. Why even bother with physical media at that point? Save yourself the time and effort and just buy digital. :psyduck:

Digital isn't as good quality when it comes to video or sound.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Casimir Radon posted:

Did you buy it before home file servers were easy to come by?

Full on dork mode - I spent time this past weekend ripping the extended cuts of Lord of the Rings (spread across 2 discs) and combining them into one file. I have a small amount of satisfaction from this.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Iron Crowned posted:

The Matrix was mine.

Our DVD player also came with the "Four free DVD's!" voucher. 3/4 of them were "The Stepmom," "Titanic," and "Lost in Space," what number 4 was? :iiam:

Lethal Weapon 4? I did not get Titanic though.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

First DVD was Tim Burton's Batman. First DVD player was a piece of crap divx player from Circuit City, but returned it for a Toshiba Dual Disc SD3109.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

I don't think the 70MM print I saw last month looked anything like that green-tinted trailer. It resembled the coloring on the blu-ray.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

https://www.wbshop.com/products/supergirl-bd

Supergirl, the Movie, coming to Blu-Ray later this month.

It's my favorite bad movie.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Superman 1978 was filmed with such soft focus it's hard to imagine the resolution bump helping.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Five Cent Deposit posted:

I know the difference. I work in feature post production on stuff you’ve seen. I came into the industry before the transition from film to digital acquisition and before high definition home media formats. I’ve worked with, and for, film labs, DI facilities, VFX facilities, restoration facilities, and so on.

Thank you for this. Anyone have links to any good articles / examples of films with technical flaws exposed because the home video version being too revealing? I recall reading when Superman 3 was released to DVD, an area of the sky that was supposed to be "bleached" in the theatrical run wasn't on the DVD transfer, revealing the wires holding Christopher Reeve during some flying sequences.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Boywhiz88 posted:

Right? I don’t have a car and don’t live by Woodbury anymore so it feels so close yet so far.

Yup. I don't think a 90 minute bus ride from Minneapolis is worth the effort.

Also the Trylon showed Lawrence of Arabia some months back, so the sting is lessened.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Liar Lyre posted:

I do wonder how much of our perspective on physical media is skewed by being collectors. How many movies did people own back in the VHS or DVD days? I know I’m an outlier. I probably owned over 1,500 movies since Pinocchio in 93. I bet the average was only about 80.

I'd guess, in VHS days, 12-20 tapes that were purchased, the rest bootlegged or taped off TV.

I had a great uncle who had like 2,000 VHS tapes though.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Xenomrph posted:

Pffft I won’t watch Popeye cartoons in anything less than 16K.

The Fleischer Studios Popeye shorts have awesome animation, I'd love to see them in HD. I'm not too familiar with the Famous Studios releases though.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Easy Diff posted:

Remember when DVD first hit the scene, and we were going to have "angle options" like being able to switch between shot/reverse shot from our remote? And then nobody ever used that feature except for like exactly 1 porno and then that was the end of that. (not because of the porn, but just because it was a stupid idea that necessitated putting a lot of extra work into the release)

Man, what a waste.
Maybe I'm thinking of Seamless Branching, but I think the angle feature was used for alternate language title cards and credits in some films.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

A minor thing from DVD i do not miss - on dual layer discs, half way through the film my DVD player would have a slight pause during the layer change. So minor, yet very distracting.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

caligulamprey posted:

In the same vein I really miss those off-putting scenes in movies that go on for a beat too long to accommodate a reel change.

Digital film making ruined everything.

I've never picked up on this, could you give a good example? I'm a little more aware of reel changes these days from watching beat-up prints at our microcinema, I'll have to keep an eye out for these.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

FilthyImp posted:

Remember any movies where scene happened and it just stayed there until this frame with a burn-mark looking thing in the upper right hand corner came in? Then the audio and image jumped slightly?

Unfortunately not, though I'm more aware of the cigarette burns and reel changes from recent screenings of older films. Years of seeing films digitally projected or on Blu-ray and DVD have hidden this phenomenon.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

TheScott2K posted:

They eschewed special features in favor of cranking the bitrate. It wasn't worth it.

They had better sound though, and it was worth it. If you never watched special features, anyways.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

CPL593H posted:

Blu-ray killed off Superbit almost immediately.

Superbit came out 5 years before Blu-ray, and I'm pretty sure they were Sony exclusive DVDs. I remember being happy to get some decent DTS tracks at the time.

Want to talk archaic? How about what preceded Superbit - seperate releases for DTS-encoded discs.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Monday_ posted:

What's the deal with a DTS soundtrack being worth paying extra for? Was the quality noticeably better than DD 5.1? Or did a lot of receivers back then only support one or the other?

Early DTS tracks were 1.5MBPS and dolby 5.1 were like 300-400k if I remember correctly. It's hard to say if the better sound on some of the early releases were from a better mix or the higher bitrate, but it sounded decent. In the early DVD days, a lot of receivers did not have DTS decoders.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Boywhiz88 posted:



What I’m saying is support your local micro cinema!

Apparently we both support the same local micro cinema. I caught Brazil and Blade Runner, and wish I would have made it to more in the series.

caligulamprey posted:

I've never heard the term Micro Cinema, though the majority of non-chain/second-run theaters in Portland do weekly revival screenings.


It's literally a tiny theater. It has about 80 seats, and they alternate between showing old 35MM prints and digital presentations. It's mostly volunteer run - it's hard to know if it's financially viable, but if it ever shuts down, it will be a sad, sad affair.

roffels fucked around with this message at 12:46 on May 1, 2019

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Boywhiz88 posted:

OK street parking. A 5 car lot for Peace Coffee, I use it when it’s a screening right before Peace closes or if it’s closed already. But right off Minnehaha, so the 7? line is right there.

It's also not too far from the light rail on lake st if you don't mind a short walk.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Detective No. 27 posted:

So my friend and I are gonna go halves on a one year license on a program to dump dvds/blurays. He used the trial to test out a bluray. It took 4 hours. Not surprising, given how slow bluray drives are
Is this a laptop drive or something? My rips take around 40 minutes max.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Unmature posted:

Saw it at the Egyptian theater in LA a couple weeks ago in 70mm and thought the same thing. Was a hell of an experience.

It's intermission at the 70MM screening I'm at right now. What a beautiful looking film.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Boywhiz88 posted:

Heights Theater in the Twin Cities?

That's it!

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Boywhiz88 posted:

Nice! I was thinking about going but had too much to do, so I opted for the Blu-Ray. Hence the topic and specificity. I can’t remember if Alamo Drafthouse had a 70mm or a digital copy, I think the latter. gently caress, that would have been so tight to catch. Oh well, next time!

70MM is rare around here, but the film makes its way around. Trylon played it digitally last year.

roffels fucked around with this message at 02:22 on Jul 30, 2019

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

CPL593H posted:

Also a lot of early DVD era "widescreen" DVDs were actually just the fullscreen version of the movie slightly cropped. When you watched some movies poo poo would be cut off at the top of the picture.

Are you referring to open matte films? Or something else? I don't recall pan&scan copies getting cropped being a thing, but there are definitely a lot of open matte films - though it's usually more appropriate to consider the 4x3 versions as "opened up", sometimes revealing boom mics and other things viewers weren't supposed to see.

roffels fucked around with this message at 01:23 on Dec 21, 2020

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Popcorn is the worst food for films because it's the loudest. And for some reason, 70% of people at the theaters are compelled to chew it with their mouths open, and rattle their tub throughout the film. I hate that this is tradition.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Spatulater bro! posted:

It's not even close to the loudest. If I'm eating kettle cooked potato chips I have to pause the movie until I'm finished. I can't even hear over my own crunching.

I haven't seen theaters selling kettle cooked potato chips. But if they do, they're monsters.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

caligulamprey posted:

I was gonna throw down the cash just for the signed Elvira poster alone until I found out it was $80.

That's actually cheaper than her usual rate!

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Cacator posted:

The last time I went to a Room screening it was people being drunk as hell yelling over each other for the entire runtime (and the occasional spoon throwing). It was so obnoxious that I never want to do that again.

I lasted about 10 minutes before I walked out. Not my crowd, I don't enjoy yelling "water" or "slut" at the movie, nor do I enjoy being around others yelling.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Best bootleg I ever saw was at a market in Cambodia. Superman Returns, only it was titled "Overwhelming American Action Movie"

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

zer0spunk posted:

Those are the same folks who are cool sitting in the first rows of a theater. For some reason, they've convinced themselves that having to move your head around to follow the action for two hours is immersive or something.

I used to have a list of the row/seat number in different theaters that got you dead center middle row so I'm a total dick about this.

I do it because I'm less likely to have anyone sitting next to me or behind me. Sometimes it backfires and some people late to the movie and are naturally distracting throughout sit up front.

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

Steen71 posted:

This is absolutely an entirely justified use case for piracy. As long as you've paid for some version of the films (I bought them once on VHS and once on DVD), there is nothing to feel bad about.

Yeah... some fans out there have gone and scanned a few theatrical prints at 4k and cleaned them up. Way better than watching a DVD copy that was just a laserdisc transfer.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

roffels
Jul 27, 2004

Yo Taxi!

pwn posted:

:hfive:

There was no price tag on it so I basically got it free

I still don't believe I found a 4k of Sausage Party from the UK, with slip, sitting in a record store in Wisconsin

Anyway I didn't watch either yet because I ended up going to the other record store and watched a couple chill acts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G8P7D1Fqf0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Z1Sy4v0CFk

Worth the $5.
The Nunnery is so good!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply