|
Wandle Cax posted:One of the reasons this film is so good is the way it efficiently establishes its rules and doesn't over explain what's happening. So of course it will attract the dumbest of nitpicks that are missing the point entirely. How these people are able to enjoy any film is beyond me The characters in this movie *are* incredibly dumb, and there are a lot of logic holes, but this isn't the type of movie you approach from that aspect going in. If you do, you'll just end up questioning things too much and not enjoy it.
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2018 00:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 18:37 |
|
|
Raccooon posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO_SH-RTvvo Moving them will make a lot of noise. I'm assuming they can rip through tanks and construction equipment?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2018 00:29
|
|
|
Also, bunkers and concrete muffles a ton of sound. Core of military and thinktanks would be ome of the last targets, unless thats where the meteor strikes were aimed. Didn't matter to the movie, but that's the fun stuff to think about after the fact.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2018 05:13
|
|
|
LividLiquid posted:I'm really not surprised that a movie whose premise was secondary to an extended exploration of parenthood devolved into a tactical realism argument. Themes aside, the actual things happening in the movie stressed tactical realism as the movie was also all about tactics on its surface, so it should be no surprise when people question them.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 23, 2018 15:20
|
|
|
LividLiquid posted:In terms of how to stay alive? Absolutely. But the film gave zero fucks about telling us what was going on out in the rest of the world. We're localized to one rural location. Ugh, way too late to this but when the issue is incremental survival, the brain of the average viewer goes to tactics. The Thing is the best balance of that because the viewer doesn't know wtf to do in that situation. 70s Body Snatchers as well. Its a weird balance to keep.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 21, 2018 03:08
|
|