|
I got to the point where he talks about punching in combat and closed the tab
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 00:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Bonus Round!@!!! 1:55
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 00:10
|
|
|
god drat it I should have remembered to open that link in an incognito window, now I'm going to get 'Watch as JP DESTROYS this feminazi protester!' and other similar recommendations for weeks. Youtube already recommends me right wing people constantly for some reason; I repeatedly tell them I'm not interested in the videos but they just keep trying to turn me into a nazi for some reason. Also, I got 2 minutes in. His voice is just kind of gross and annoying. Also I'm in university right now and it's so easy to tell he's full of poo poo if you have any knowledge of stats or psychology or a basic capacity for critical thinking; it's actually offensive to me that this is a class. Isn't the university of toronto supposed to be reputable or something? how can they employ this guy?? A Spherical Sponge has issued a correction as of 00:24 on Apr 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 00:22
|
|
|
"Tyrant who's afraid of death" Began furiously skimming for a point. I failed the jp challenge.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 00:34
|
|
|
Sarsapariller posted:I got to the point where he clipped an onion to his belt, which was the style at the time. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 00:59
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:spoiler alert I played Xenogears and watched Evangelion, so somehow I know more than Jordan Peterson about Jungian analysis.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 01:23
|
|
:
|
i stopped reading when he started talking about husbands and wives, shortly after the talk about Peter Pan and Captain Hook and other nonsense. this was an incredibly dull read, thanks also i'm not watching that video because i'm going to get recommendations to watch him if i do. i already get numerous "Steamed Hams but ________" videos that i'm told i should watch in spite of never watching a single one of them get that OUT of my face has issued a correction as of 01:31 on Apr 8, 2018 |
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 01:28
|
|
|
I read the entire way through that block of text. Jordan Peterson sounds like the lovely parent equivalent of those Nice Guys who demand I could only make it a minute into that video though, because I have no idea what trait neuroticism means, have no intention of researching it, and don't care enough to try and debunk this half-rate, kermit the frog sounding, kid poking rear end in a top hat dragon.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 01:32
|
|
|
it means being prone to react with negative emotions in adverse situations why this would include women crying, but not guys yelling and punching people is an exercise
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 02:25
|
|
|
I thought this was going to be the script to Get Out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 02:42
|
|
|
I watched the video it was from
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 02:42
|
|
|
1:32. Because he's talking about (1) bell curve, which I understand, but then he starts adding multiple curves, I guess, and then "moving them around" This was already with my brain trying to sound the depths of the mystery of what he meant by people being "over-represented" by anxiety or depression on one side, and alcoholism and being an rear end in a top hat on the other, and sure you mean - the data shows this - if you talk about a gender split? Also I swear I've never heard petersen speak before, and my first thought was "wow, people were not kidding about the Kermit the frog thing."
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 03:37
|
|
|
tl;dr
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 08:53
|
|
|
Jeb! Repetition posted:I watched the video it was from No Spoiler policy is in effect for round 2.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 14:13
|
|
|
quote:Mother made some pancakes for Billy Perhaps it is just my bias going in, but the second I read even the first sentence I knew it was going to be a waste of time
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 20:10
|
|
|
gently caress this
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 20:15
|
|
|
sit on my Facebook posted:I made it as far as the first time he said "eh" and reminded me that on top of being a deplorable pseudo intellectual jerk, he's also Canadian and then it was all just too much Almost did this, actually stopped at "BETTER GET ALONG WITH THEM PLUS you’re going to end up" when the pretentiousness and idiocy combined to strangle me and now i am dead
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 22:08
|
|
|
quote:CLUE IN, PRIMATE Imagine being in one of xer classes and having to listen to poo poo like this all semester.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 22:08
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Ready? this is where i stopped. academic jargon in the humanities obfuscating meaning is a thing, but at least beneath it the actual syntax isn't so bad. this is bad. this is so, so bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 22:52
|
|
|
jordan peterson is a dumbfuck's idea of what a smart guy sounds like
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 22:53
|
|
|
Willie Tomg posted:jordan peterson is a dumbfuck's idea of what a smart guy sounds like
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 23:19
|
|
|
"For twelve years, you have been asking: Who is John Galt? This is John Galt speaking. I am the man who loves his life. I am the man who does not sacrifice his love or his values. I am the man who has deprived you of victims and thus has destroyed your world, and if you wish to know why you are perishing-you who dread knowledge-I am the man who will now tell you." The chief engineer was the only one able to move; he ran to a television set and struggled frantically with its dials. But the screen remained empty; the speaker had not chosen to be seen. Only his voice filled the airways of the country-of the world, thought the chief engineer-sounding as if he were speaking here, in this room, not to a group, but to one man; it was not the tone of addressing a meeting, but the tone of addressing a mind. "You have heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis. You have said it yourself, half in fear, half in hope that the words had no meaning. You have cried that man's sins are destroying the world and you have cursed human nature for its unwillingness to practice the virtues you demanded. Since virtue, to you, consists of sacrifice, you have demanded more sacrifices at every successive disaster. In the name of a return to morality, you have sacrificed all those evils which you held as the cause of your plight. You have sacrificed justice to mercy. You have sacrificed independence to unity. You have sacrificed reason to faith. You have sacrificed wealth to need. You have sacrificed self-esteem to self-denial. You have sacrificed happiness to duty. "You have destroyed all that which you held to be evil and achieved all that which you held to be good. Why, then, do you shrink in horror from the sight of the world around you? That world is not the product of your sins, it is the product and the image of your virtues. It is your moral ideal brought into reality in its full and final perfection. You have fought for it, you have dreamed of it, and you have wished it, and I-I am the man who has granted you your wish. "Your ideal had an implacable enemy, which your code of morality was designed to destroy. I have withdrawn that enemy. I have taken it out of your way and out of your reach. I have removed the source of all those evils you were sacrificing one by one. I have ended your battle. I have stopped your motor. I have deprived your world of man's mind. "Men do not live by the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those who do. The mind is impotent, you say? I have withdrawn those whose mind isn't. There are values higher than the mind, you say? I have withdrawn those for whom there aren't. "While you were dragging to your sacrificial altars the men of justice, of independence, of reason, of wealth, of self-esteem-I beat you to it, I reached them first. I told them the nature of the game you were playing and the nature of that moral code of yours, which they had been too innocently generous to grasp. I showed them the way to live by another morality-mine. It is mine that they chose to follow. "All the men who have vanished, the men you hated, yet dreaded to lose, it is I who have taken them away from you. Do not attempt to find us. We do not choose to be found. Do not cry that it is our duty to serve you. We do not recognize such duty. Do not cry that you need us. We do not consider need a claim. Do not cry that you own us. You don't. Do not beg us to return. We are on strike, we, the men of the mind. "We are on strike against self-immolation. We are on strike against the creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. We are on strike against the dogma that the pursuit of one's happiness is evil. We are on strike against the doctrine that life is guilt. "There is a difference between our strike and all those you've practiced for centuries: our strike consists, not of making demands, but of granting them. We are evil, according to your morality. We have chosen not to harm you any longer. We are useless, according to your economics. We have chosen not to exploit you any longer. We are dangerous and to be shackled, according to your politics. We have chosen not to endanger you, nor to wear the shackles any longer. We are only an illusion, according to your philosophy. We have chosen not to blind you any longer and have left you free to face reality-the reality you wanted, the world as you see it now, a world without mind. "We have granted you everything you demanded of us, we who had always been the givers, but have only now understood it. We have no demands to present to you, no terms to bargain about, no compromise to reach. You have nothing to offer us. We do not need you. "Are you now crying: No, this was not what you wanted? A mindless world of ruins was not your goal? You did not want us to leave you? You moral cannibals, I know that you've always known what it was that you wanted. But your game is up, because now we know it, too. "Through centuries of scourges and disasters, brought about by your code of morality, you have cried that your code had been broken, that the scourges were punishment for breaking it, that men were too weak and too selfish to spill all the blood it required. You damned man, you damned existence, you damned this earth, but never dared to question your code. Your victims took the blame and struggled on, with your curses as reward for their martyrdom-while you went on crying that your code was noble, but human nature was not good enough to practice it. And no one rose to ask the question: Good?-by what standard? "You wanted to know John Galt's identity. I am the man who has asked that question. "Yes, this is an age of moral crisis. Yes, you are bearing punishment for your evil. But it is not man who is now on trial and it is not human nature that will take the blame. It is your moral code that's through, this time. Your moral code has reached its climax, the blind alley at the end of its course. And if you wish to go on living, what you now need is not to return to morality-you who have never known any-but to discover it. "You have heard no concepts of morality but the mystical or the social. You have been taught that morality is a code of behavior imposed on you by whim, the whim of a supernatural power or the whim of society, to serve God's purpose or your neighbor's welfare, to please an authority beyond the grave or else next door-but not to serve your life or pleasure. Your pleasure, you have been taught, is to be found in immorality, your interests would best be served by evil, and any moral code must be designed not for you, but against you, not to further your life, but to drain it. "For centuries, the battle of morality was fought between those who claimed that your life belongs to God and those who claimed that it belongs to your neighbors-between those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of ghosts in heaven and those who preached that the good is self-sacrifice for the sake of incompetents on earth. And no one came to say that your life belongs to you and that the good is to live it. "Both sides agreed that morality demands the surrender of your self-interest and of your mind, that the moral and the practical are opposites, that morality is not the province of reason, but the province of faith and force. Both sides agreed that no rational morality is possible, that there is no right or wrong in reason-that in reason there's no reason to be moral. "Whatever else they fought about, it was against man's mind that all your moralists have stood united. It was man's mind that all their schemes and systems were intended to despoil and destroy. Now choose to perish or to learn that the anti-mind is the anti-life. "Man's mind is his basic tool of survival. Life is given to him, survival is not. His body is given to him, its sustenance is not. His mind is given to him, its content is not. To remain alive, he must act, and before he can act he must know the nature and purpose of his action. He cannot obtain his food without a knowledge of food and of the way to obtain it. He cannot dig a ditch-or build a cyclotron-without a knowledge of his aim and of the means to achieve it. To remain alive, he must think. "But to think is an act of choice. The key to what you so recklessly call 'human nature,' the open secret you live with, yet dread to name, is the fact that man is a being of volitional consciousness. Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct. The function of your stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function of your mind is not. In any hour and issue of your life, you are free to think or to evade that effort. But you are not free to escape from your nature, from the fact that reason is your means of survival-so that for you, who are a human being, the question 'to be or not to be' is the question 'to' think or not to think.' "A being of volitional consciousness has no automatic course of behavior. He needs a code of values to guide his actions. 'Value' is that which one acts to gain and keep, 'virtue' is the action by which one gains and keeps it. 'Value' presupposes an answer to the question: of value to whom and for what? 'Value' presupposes a standard, a purpose and the necessity of action in the face of an alternative. Where there are no alternatives, no values are possible. "There is only one fundamental alternative in the universe: existence or non-existence-and it pertains to a single class of entities: to living organisms. The existence of inanimate matter is unconditional, the existence of life is not; it depends on a specific course of action. Matter is indestructible, it changes its forms, but it cannot cease to exist. It is only a living organism that faces a constant alternative: the issue of life or death. Life is a process of self-sustaining and-self-generated action. If an organism fails in that action, it does; its chemical elements remain, but its life goes out of existence. It is only the concept of 'Life' that makes the concept of 'Value' possible. It is only to a living entity that things can be good or evil. "A plant must feed itself in order to live; the sunlight, the water, the chemicals it needs are the values its nature has set it to pursue; its life is the standard of value directing its actions. But a plant has no choice of action; there are alternatives in the conditions it encounters, but there is no alternative in its function: it acts automatically to further its life, it cannot act for its own destruction. "An animal is equipped for sustaining its life; its senses provide it with an automatic code of action, an automatic knowledge of what is good for it or evil. It has no power to extend its knowledge or to evade it. In conditions where its knowledge proves inadequate, it dies. But so long as it lives, it acts on its knowledge, with automatic safety and no power of choice, it is unable to ignore its own good, unable to decide to choose the evil and act as its own destroyer. "Man has no automatic code of survival. His particular distinction from all other living species is the necessity to act in the face of alternatives by means of volitional choice. He has no automatic knowledge of what is good for him or evil, what values his life depends on, what course of action it requires. Are you prattling about an instinct of self-preservation? An instinct of self-preservation is precisely what man does not possess. An 'instinct' is an unerring and automatic form of knowledge. A desire is not an instinct. A desire to live does not give you the knowledge required for living. And even man's desire to live is not automatic: your secret evil today is that that is the desire you do not hold. Your fear of death is not a love of life and will not give you the knowledge needed to keep it. Man must obtain his knowledge and choose his actions by a process of thinking, which nature will not force him t9 perform. Man has the power to act as his own destroyer-and that is the way he has acted through most of his history. "A living entity that regarded its means of survival as evil, would not survive. A plant that struggled to mangle its roots, a bird that fought to break its wings would not remain for long in the existence they affronted. But the history of man has been a struggle to deny and to destroy his mind. "Man has been called a rational being, but rationality is a matter of choice-and the alternative his nature offers him is: rational being or suicidal animal. Man has to be man-by choice; he has to hold his life as a value-by choice: he has to learn to sustain it-by choice; he has to discover the values it requires and practice his virtues-by choice. "A code of values accepted by choice is a code of morality. "Whoever you are, you who are hearing me now, I am speaking to whatever living remnant is left uncorrupted within you, to the remnant of the human, to your mind, and I say: There is a morality of reason, a morality proper to man, and Man's Life is its standard of value. "All that which is proper to the life of a rational being is the good; all that which destroys it is the evil. "Man's life, as required by his nature, is not the life of a mindless brute, of a looting thug or a mooching mystic, but the life of a thinking being-not life by means of force or fraud, but life by means of achievement-not survival at any price, since there's only one price that pays for man's survival: reason. "Man's life is the standard of morality, but your own life is its purpose. If existence on earth is your goal, you must choose your actions and values by the standard of that which is proper to man-for the purpose of preserving, fulfilling and enjoying the irreplaceable value which is your life. "Since life requires a specific course of action, any other course will destroy it. A being who does not hold his own life as the motive and goal of his actions, is acting on the motive and standard of death. Such a being is a metaphysical monstrosity, struggling to oppose, negate and contradict the fact of his own existence, running blindly amuck on a trail of destruction, capable of nothing but pain. "Happiness is the successful state of life, pain is an agent of death. Happiness is that state of consciousness which proceeds from the achievement of one's values. A morality that dares to tell you to find happiness in the renunciation of your happiness-to value the failure of your values-is an insolent negation of morality. A doctrine that gives you, as an ideal, the role of a sacrificial animal seeking slaughter on the altars of others, is giving you death as your standard. By the grace of reality and the nature of life, man-every man-is an end in himself, he exists for his own sake, and the achievement of his own happiness is his highest moral purpose. "But neither life nor happiness can be achieved by the pursuit of irrational whims. Just as man is free to attempt to survive in any random manner, but will perish unless he lives as his nature requires, so he is free to seek his happiness in any mindless fraud, but the torture of frustration is all he will find, unless he seeks the happiness proper to man. The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die, but to enjoy yourself and live. "Sweep aside those parasites of subsidized classrooms, who live on the profits of the mind of others and proclaim that man needs no morality, no values, no code of behavior. They, who pose as scientists and claim that man is only an animal, do not grant him inclusion in the law of existence they have granted to the lowest of insects. They recognize that every living species has a way of survival demanded by its nature, they do not claim that a fish can live out of water or that a dog can live without its sense of smell-but man, they claim, the most complex of beings, man can survive in any way whatever, man has no identity, no nature, and there's no practical reason why he cannot live with his means of survival destroyed, with his mind throttled and placed at the disposal of any orders they might care to issue. "Sweep aside those hatred-eaten mystics, who pose as friends of humanity and preach that the highest virtue man can practice is to hold his own life as of no value. Do they tell you that the purpose of morality is to curb man's instinct of self-preservation? It is for the purpose of self-preservation that man needs a code of morality. The only man who desires to be moral is the man who desires to live. "No, you do not have to live; it is your basic act of choice; but if you choose to live,. you must live as a man-by the work and the judgment of your mind. "No, you do not have to live as a man; it is an act of moral choice. But you cannot live as anything else-and the alternative is that state of living death which you now see within you and around you, the state of a thing unfit for existence, no longer human and less than animal, a thing that knows nothing but pain and drags itself through its span of years in the agony of unthinking self-destruction. "No, you do not have to think; it is an act of moral choice. But someone had to think to keep you alive; if you choose to default, you default on existence and you pass the deficit to some moral man, expecting him to sacrifice his good for the sake of letting you survive by your evil. "No, you do not have to be a man; but today those who are, are not there any longer. I have removed your means of survival-your victims. "If you wish to know how I have done it and what I told them to make them quit, you are hearing it now. I told them, in essence, the statement I am making tonight. They were men who had lived by my code, but had not known how great a virtue it represented. I made them see it. I brought them, not a re-evaluation, but only an identification of their values. "We, the men of the mind, are now on strike against you in the name of a single axiom, which is the root of our moral code, just as the root of yours is the wish to escape it: the axiom that existence exists. "Existence exists-and the act of grasping that statement implies two corollary axioms: that something exists which one perceives and that one exists possessing consciousness, consciousness being the faculty of perceiving that which exists. "If nothing exists, there can be no consciousness: a consciousness with nothing to be conscious of is a contradiction in terms. A consciousness conscious of nothing but itself is a contradiction in terms: before it could identify itself as consciousness, it had to be conscious of something. If that which you claim to perceive does not exist, what you possess is not consciousness.
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 23:47
|
|
|
At least Peterson had the decency to put his meandering, ultimately baseless diatribes about "the right way to do things" under a nonfiction label
|
|
#
?
Apr 8, 2018 23:52
|
|
|
A friend of a friend was defending Jordan Peterson on Facebook yesterday. Of course I was curious about what kind of idiot I was dealing with, so I clicked their profile and found that they have their gender listed as "Attack Helicopter.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 00:26
|
|
|
GWBBQ posted:A friend of a friend was defending Jordan Peterson on Facebook yesterday. Of course I was curious about what kind of idiot I was dealing with, so I clicked their profile and found that they have their gender listed as "Attack Helicopter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co6d3h-NpS8
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 00:50
|
|
|
GWBBQ posted:A friend of a friend was defending Jordan Peterson on Facebook yesterday. Of course I was curious about what kind of idiot I was dealing with, so I clicked their profile and found that they have their gender listed as "Attack Helicopter. attacke helicopters are all rear end holes
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 01:23
|
|
|
GWBBQ posted:A friend of a friend was defending Jordan Peterson on Facebook yesterday. Of course I was curious about what kind of idiot I was dealing with, so I clicked their profile and found that they have their gender listed as "Attack Helicopter. I swear I’ve heard of that before as a reaction to gender identity as a concept.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 01:47
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:Mother made some pancakes for Billy, but the dragon ate them all! Mother made some more, but the dragon ate those too. Wtf, this dragon's a dick, yo
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:07
|
|
|
Dreddout posted:Wtf, this dragon's a dick, yo pancakes are good
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:08
|
|
|
mrbradlymrmartin posted:pancakes are good They were made for Billy The dragon should have asked if he could have some
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:40
|
|
|
"comments disabled until the end of the Memefucker Era"
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:48
|
|
|
got through the whole thing. who knew reading james joyce, thomas bernhard and william gaddis was all just prep work for big jordy p
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:53
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I swear I’ve heard of that before as a reaction to gender identity as a concept.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 02:56
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I swear I’ve heard of that before as a reaction to gender identity as a concept. it's a lovely meme for idiots, yeah efb
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 03:00
|
|
|
pretty sure 'sexually identify as an attack helicopter' was originally a 4chan meme
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 05:26
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:I swear I’ve heard of that before as a reaction to gender identity as a concept. Yeah it's a stale meme at this point
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 13:06
|
|
|
*bursts into the thread covered in perspiration* DID YOU KNOW THAT IDENTIFYING AS AN ATTACK HELICOPTER IS ACTUALLY A MEME
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 18:11
|
|
|
rudatron posted:pretty sure 'sexually identify as an attack helicopter' was originally a 4chan meme
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 18:20
|
|
|
Yeah, only got a couple sentences in. I stand by my trolling of my old friend who buys into his garbage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 18:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
whoever said jordy petes is a modern L Ron Hubbard was right on the nose
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2018 19:07
|
|