Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
killer crane
Dec 30, 2006

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2019

kaworu posted:

Ursula K Le Guin

same.

So does a stingy economy of word really define good prose though? Most of the books I've read of hers are from the limited third person, and it makes sense to get the main characters limited view across, using limited words. Does an omniscient voice need to say more? Does first person need fewer?

I think most of what we see as bad prose is inappropriate word economy for the voice the author is using. My guilty pleasure currently is the Dresden Files. First person voice, and every action, or romantic scene is over explained; overly flourished. For the first 4 books I gave it a pass because I thought it was an homage to pulp mysteries, but after reading another one of Butcher's novels I have my doubts.

But then how much should a reader be expected to fill in? I'm reading Jane Austen now, and it is frustrating without certain cultural cues that her contemporary would have known since childhood. Can good prose become bad prose over time?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply