|
 Viva Miriya fucked around with this message at 07:15 on Jun 1, 2018 |
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 06:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
no u
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 06:35
|
|
|
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/technology/telegram-apple-russia.html It turns out that Apple will stand up to US law enforcement but rolls over immediately for other markets
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 07:19
|
|
|
Thx for op img bby Prop Wash posted:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/technology/telegram-apple-russia.html Heh
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 07:20
|
|
|
No u 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 08:48
|
|
|
Events are bad currently.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 11:30
|
|
|
starting a trade war to own the libs
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 12:13
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 12:25
|
|
|
The one super trump guy at my yard is happy the USA is putting tarrifs on us (Canada) cause it's "putting pressure on our pussy PM" Love too pay more for stuff and having people lose their jobs to own the libs
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 12:28
|
|
|
I'm asking here, because I asked this in the other CE thread right before it closed. Someone here posted a video that was a bunch of people during the Obama administration being racist towards him and his family. Does anyone have that handy?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 12:47
|
|
|
Prop Wash posted:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/technology/telegram-apple-russia.html Remember when people in gip were defending Apple's commitment to privacy? Lol crazy times.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 13:04
|
|
|
bulletsponge13 posted:I'm asking here, because I asked this in the other CE thread right before it closed. Someone here posted a video that was a bunch of people during the Obama administration being racist towards him and his family. Does anyone have that handy? This chump? https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/12/rodner-figuero-fired_n_6854678.html These folks love their Planet of the Apes schtick it would seem. Immanentized fucked around with this message at 13:09 on Jun 1, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 13:07
|
|
|
Always with the ape jokes, never with a Jane Goodall reference.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 13:27
|
|
|
Immanentized posted:This chump? That's not the one I remember, but that helps.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 13:55
|
|
|
Just a daily image that wouldn't be feasible in any mirror universe https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1002508937445478402 Also, the hoarder/smoker/possibly-alcoholic neighbor below me apparently died several weeks ago, and the apartment with his decomposing body is now being investigated. They still haven't moved the body, and the federal police haven't been able to make contact with the facility management company, so they can't seal the apartment whenever they get done. I'd say "Let me tell you about the stench", but just think Nurgle
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:16
|
|
|
Turn on the AC to desiccate the body. Use a dehumidifier if you want some corpse juice.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:37
|
|
|
Burning bodies are considerably worse smelling IMO.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:38
|
|
|
Isn't trump telling companies to fire people for what they say an actual first amendment issue?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:48
|
|
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:Isn't trump telling companies to fire people for what they say an actual first amendment issue? Yes and also a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 227. The enforcement body, in the case of the president committing these offense is congress, so 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:50
|
|
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:Isn't trump telling companies to fire people for what they say an actual first amendment issue? No. The first amendment doesn’t apply here. He didn’t give an order to fire someone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:51
|
|
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:Isn't trump telling companies to fire people for what they say an actual first amendment issue? It is. Does it matter? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:51
|
|
|
Poppyseed Poundcake posted:No. The first amendment doesn’t apply here. It does, actually, but it doesn't matter because Congress is the one who would actually have to do something about it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 14:52
|
|
|
Just reposting this cause it’s the greatest non-onion headline ever https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/1002209673146232833?s=21
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 15:13
|
|
|
Lmao is that unbelievable ammo a child? Also Canadian aluminum producers arent upset with tarrifs cause USA is basically dependent on them. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadian-aluminum-shows-its-mettle-in-face-of-trump-s-tariff-1.4686655 Steel is another story though and I could see a lot of jobs lost or production slowed
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 15:18
|
|
|
'Black lives don't matter,' lawyer says after jury awards $4 in police killing All lives matter right? e: quote:How it began 
Viva Miriya fucked around with this message at 15:23 on Jun 1, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 15:20
|
|
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:Lmao is that unbelievable ammo a child? We're totally going to Moscow theater crisis a school shooting. This steel/aluminum stuff is really loving people up. Couple of my clients have basically stopped accepting new orders and are just working out of existing stock until we hit a new price point.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 15:25
|
|
|
*Trump watches Speed* "Police need to start shooting schools up before school shooters can!"
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 15:33
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:It does, actually, but it doesn't matter because Congress is the one who would actually have to do something about it. https://openargs.com/oa178-trump-and-the-nfl/ This deals with the issue, and IIRC the 1st amendment issue does not apply, but I forgot why. edit: just relistened the episode. Even if Trump calls up all the team owners and says he wants them to fire kneeling players, that's not a 1st amendment violation. As long as he doesn't put the legislature or any agency under pressure to accomplish it, or otherwise uses some sort of official act, it's not a violation. And yes, that does mean that he can call up all the team owners and go "hey listen, I really really want you to fire the players who kneel during the anthem." He has the right to advocate a platform, and that's apparently separate from an official act of the office. Dance Officer fucked around with this message at 16:23 on Jun 1, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:01
|
|
|
gently caress 👏 the 👏 NRA https://twitter.com/nra/status/1002505041880772608?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:08
|
|
|
Dance Officer posted:https://openargs.com/oa178-trump-and-the-nfl/ The first amendment can (and does) apply because the NFL is a quasi-public institution based on the amount of federal funding they receive in the form of tax benefits, monopoly protection, and statutory exemptions. This argument has not been specifically tested in court, but there's legal backing to support the concept. This is mainly that the NFL may not be able to restrict players speech on 1a grounds. As far as Trump goes, he's violated 18 U.S. Code § 227 in a very cut and dry manner. It's via this violation that you could argue a 1a claim against him because his illegal act is directly impacting free speech by limiting employment opportunities. I'm definitely not listening to an hour podcast, though. I'd be interested in reading a transcript but I personally don't like to listen to podcasts at all.,
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:gently caress 👏 the 👏 NRA https://twitter.com/fifi_snow/status/1002567047971254272?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:27
|
|
|
Mr. Nice! posted:The first amendment can (and does) apply because the NFL is a quasi-public institution based on the amount of federal funding they receive in the form of tax benefits, monopoly protection, and statutory exemptions. This argument has not been specifically tested in court, but there's legal backing to support the concept. This is mainly that the NFL may not be able to restrict players speech on 1a grounds. The episode also deals with this issue, and no, the NFL would not be a quasi-public institution just because it receives funding from the gov't. What makes a quasi-public institution or not has been tested in court and according to the episode, getting federal funding would not make it quasi-public according to case law. So the 1st amendment doesn't apply. As for listening in, the NFL bit starts at 26 mins or so.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:29
|
|
|
Dance Officer posted:The episode also deals with this issue, and no, the NFL would not be a quasi-public institution just because it receives funding from the gov't. What makes a quasi-public institution or not has been tested in court and according to the episode, getting federal funding would not make it quasi-public according to case law. So the 1st amendment doesn't apply. It's not just because it receives government funding. The NFL (along with MLB) have specific anti-trust exemptions and other statutory protections that go far beyond just funding. It hasn't been tested, but it isn't a closed door because one podcast that doesn't talk about the full issue says it is. I could link other lawyers writing the opposite. This goes simply to the NFL rule prohibiting protests could potentially run afoul of the 1a, but this has nothing to do with Trump. 18 U.S. Code § 227 is the more pertinent issue at hand, though, vs the quasi-public aspect. This is the statute that Trump violated by calling owners and threatening them to change policy. This is the avenue via which someone would have a 1a claim against Trump. Trump has forced the NFL owners to make employment decisions that infringe upon the 1a guarantee to freedom of speech.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:41
|
|
|
Dance Officer posted:The episode also deals with this issue, and no, the NFL would not be a quasi-public institution just because it receives funding from the gov't. What makes a quasi-public institution or not has been tested in court and according to the episode, getting federal funding would not make it quasi-public according to case law. So the 1st amendment doesn't apply. Unfortunately, this would be true of the NFL determined of their own accord to push the ban. They didn't. And Kaepernick's lawyer intends to prove that Trump was directly involved in pressuring them to push the ban, as well as possibly influencing them not to hire Kaepernick. Which IS a violation of the 1st amendment. E: South Carolina has admitted they use no-knock raids without a warrant, in violation of SCOTUS ruling. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...m=.93b52f332b0f" Best part: The person they raided had a mounted camera in front of his door that showed everyone on the task force lied to the court about both knocking and wearing clearly identifying clothing. CommieGIR fucked around with this message at 17:45 on Jun 1, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
Slow news day. Did infrastructure week finally end?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:13
|
|
|
Infrastructure week never ends.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:gently caress 👏 the 👏 NRA
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:Unfortunately, this would be true of the NFL determined of their own accord to push the ban.  Normal
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:38
|
|
|
sharknado slashfic posted:Slow news day. Did infrastructure week finally end? The news is regular dumb, not trump-level dumb today. https://twitter.com/DavidNakamura/status/1002604451012718592?s=19 https://twitter.com/AriNatter/status/1002599886896947200?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 16:59 |
|
|
Nationalizing dead industries to own the libs.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2018 18:43
|
|