Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
The superior voting system is
This poll is closed.
First-past-the-post voting 1 1.47%
Preferential voting (IRV) 67 98.53%
Total: 68 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

I'm confused as to how IRV is supposed to entrench centrist Democrats, unless you believe that centrists appeal to more people than leftwingers which wouldn't really speak well of your belief in your own ideology.

I can see how the top-two system in California does this (the state party pressures left wing Democrats to drop out to avoid a lockout). In an IRV system, especially one that has primaries, the party might still want left wing candidates to drop out (because it's full of neolib centrist scum or something) but it would have no argument to voters as to why they should put Centrist Dem as their first preference instead of Left Dem 1 > Centrist Dem 2. If the party organization is full of centrists, the voting system will not stop them from wanting centrist candidates.

Is your view that left wing Dems can only be elected if they win their primary in a fluke and centrists are forced to vote for them in the general?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread