|
I feel like the claims of being elitist and randist are a bit undercut by how the series consistently infantilizes the rich. The truth is that Evelyn was right that her dad was being an idiot and people shouldn't blindly just trust superheroes. But that's never really been the point of Incredibles. The first film is about how family, friendships, and our ties to one another strengthen us. This sequel builds on this and even critiques the original film. While Incredibles builds the importance of family, it also casts family as a reflection of its male protagonist. The sequel is about Bob learning how he supports his family, specifically Helen, and how that means sometimes taking a step back. What makes Everyln the bad guy is her belief that if you can't just blindly trust the superheroes then you can't trust them at all. There is no in-between for her. I once again find the elitism complaints weird because the heroes are shown constantly to be fallible. The inability to see both good intent but fallibility is what makes the villain the villain. Both films aren't championing elitism. They're championing humility and cooperation. With that said, there is a LOT going on in the film that doesn't really pay off. The police body cameras might be more incidental than trying to say anything, but the film seems to be saying things about mass media that never really adds up to much. For people who have not seen the movie yet, stay for the credits! The theme songs are wonderful. Timeless Appeal fucked around with this message at 23:25 on Jun 17, 2018 |
# ¿ Jun 17, 2018 23:22 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 09:34 |
|
Was there anything in the original Incredibles that made it clear that it was literally the 1960s and not just a film with a retro aesthetic?
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2018 23:31 |
|
Pants Donkey posted:Dash is learning New Math, which schools adopted in the 1960s. But it parallels the frustration modern parents have with Common Core mathematics so it's easy to miss.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2018 00:24 |
|
Lurdiak posted:I don't even know how anyone could argue The Incredibles wasn't a Randian film with a straight face, that's like saying there's no fascism in 300.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2018 02:45 |
|
General Dog posted:She was more severe Dreamworks face than the actual Dreamworks version.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2018 21:30 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 09:34 |
|
Magic Hate Ball posted:His belief seems to boil down to “if you can do something exceptional, you should a: be encouraged to develop your skills and b: use those skills philanthropically”, which comes with the necessary flip side of “if you can’t do anything exceptional, accept and encourage those who can”, and both elements fly in the fundamentally selfish and anti-altruistic face of Randian objectivism.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2018 17:57 |