|
Obstructing market rate development on the basis you want that development to be publicly owned is nonsense in most areas. Like the Seattle city council recently blocked/delayed a new 442 unit building, and the council definitely didn't follow up with "Also here's our new tax to fund the city building its own 100 million dollar tower". (If they did that would be awesome, but let's not pretend that objecting to market rate development generally leads to public development)
twodot fucked around with this message at 16:10 on Aug 16, 2018 |
# ¿ Aug 16, 2018 15:48 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 22:50 |
|
SousaphoneColossus posted:The opposition to that tower was overwhelmingly because it was going to replace the Showbox, not specifically because it was private development. The council wouldn't have stopped it if it was just going up on an empty lot.
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2018 21:38 |