|
 Heh.
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 06:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 03:18 |
|
|
What is the reason it's called renting
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 06:56
|
|
|
SAVE
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 07:00
|
|
|
Anidav posted:
mortgage: -$1000 rental income: +$1600 bills i pay on my rental property: -$30'000 someone help me my family is starving
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 07:00
|
|
|
BBJoey posted:What is the reason it's called renting RENTING!
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 07:50
|
|
|
hambeet posted:RENTING!
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 08:03
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/GhostWhoVotes/status/1046278291638779904
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 08:25
|
|
|
Good to see the Liberal Party’s two candidates are polling well.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 08:36
|
|
|
Well that was obvious with the preferences. Someone remembered how to count.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 08:38
|
|
|
Laserface posted:My old landlord would fill his businesses bins up and then bring his recycling and garbage around to our house to fill up ours. Yeah rental can suck. my parents still rent after buying a house during the 2008 fun times and had to cancel the lease within the year due to drastically lowered income. however they seemed to have been lucky with choices as the entire house has been opened and not say locked away for land lords storage as my mother needs a garage for her work car and that the landlord needs to call well in advance since father works night shifts, just so some one is home. The landlord has also been very not fussy and basically sees the property as a very long investment opportunity, so as long as the house cleaned and just taken care of he could care less what pictures are put up and furniture where ever
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 08:48
|
|
|
It always amazes me that tenants can’t have pets because of the damage they do, but the pets of homeowners don’t do any remarkable damage apparently. I’ve applied for a couple of places that advertised as pets ok, only to give me a lease with a clause that pets must be kept outside at all times. I mean who are we kidding? One place I turned down but the other the agent made clear that he would turn a blind eye.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 09:08
|
|
|
I believe the Libs being sub 40 and Phelps being ahead of Labor means the Libs are basically hosed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 09:18
|
|
|
MiniSune posted:I believe the Libs being sub 40 and Phelps being ahead of Labor means the Libs are basically hosed.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 09:33
|
|
|
Keep in mind a fair chunk of Greens preferences will probably flow to the LNP or Phelps ahead of the ALP.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 09:34
|
|
|
In 2016 Turnbull got 20% of the Green preferences (with the ALP getting the other 80%), and that's in line with the way they generally get distibuted. If it's Liberal v ALP then the Libs win, and if it's Liberals v Phelps then she wins. And the other options are too unlikely to consider. Doctor Spaceman fucked around with this message at 10:52 on Sep 30, 2018 |
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 09:41
|
|
|
MiniSune posted:I believe the Libs being sub 40 and Phelps being ahead of Labor means the Libs are basically hosed. Except that -23 from lib has almost all gone to Phelps and a lot of those aren't going to preference Labor, they'll just want to send a message to the libs.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 10:00
|
|
|
Coalition's changes to finance bill would override state bans on political donations https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/sep/28/coalitions-changes-to-finance-bill-would-override-state-bans-on-political-donations quote:State bans on political donations from developers and stricter caps on donations, expenditure and disclosure will be overridden by new Coalition amendments to a campaign finance bill, academics have warned.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 10:22
|
|
|
hambeet posted:Except that -23 from lib has almost all gone to Phelps and a lot of those aren't going to preference Labor, they'll just want to send a message to the libs. If Labor finishes third then they are. Depends on how the smaller party/independent preferences flow to phelps ahead of Labor. If Labor finishes second then yeah Sharma has it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 13:28
|
|
|
IF UNADULTERATED greed has infected the banking sector, the ABC’s culture has been infected by a view that it needs to balance the national conversation by usually overcompensating to left-leaning views. Believing other news sources lean too far to the right, it undertakes this foolishness and, in the process, undermines its place in the hearts of many as a national treasure. If the ABC had a collective vote, it would probably vote Labor. There’s nothing democratically wrong with that, but the broader point is, no one should know, or suspect, how reporters (commentators are not reporters) vote. Was it obvious how Laurie Oakes voted? I suggest not. The ABC should be fiercely disinterested. Its acting chairwoman, Dr Kirstin Ferguson, takes over at a crucial juncture and needs to steer the organisation smackbang down the middle. That doesn’t mean news needs always to be a he-said, she-said report, where everyone gets an equal say. Why would a reporter give equal airtime to someone who is clearly wrong or advocating extremism? Some news reports simply inform, for example a cyclone event. The ABC does a cracker job at this type of reporting. Then there are political and social reports, and this is where the broadcaster has let itself down. In some instances it has become interventionist or focused on fringe issues that affect a minority. One of the basic principles of journalism is understanding the difference between what’s in the interests of the public and what’s interesting to the public. Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s interview on ABC’s Insiders program yesterday revealed two things. 1. He will call out inaccuracy in ABC reporting and will not cop criticism that the Government is interfering in its independence. He has warned he is watching and wants the ABC to return to its glory days. 2. The ABC has fundamentally misunderstood why the Government has raised issues about its reporting. Even yesterday, Insiders host Barrie Cassidy claimed the Government complained about economics correspondent Emma Alberici because it didn’t like her. No, it was because she was deeply inaccurate in a couple of news reports then refused to own her mistakes. When asked about the issue on the program, Morrison said: “Look, I think the ABC needs to stop talking about itself and get back to work.” Cassidy then interrupted with, “we never stopped work”, to which Morrison replied: “I think the last week, I think Australians have doubted that.” “No,” Cassidy said. “We did not stop work, this was all done at the board level.” Cassidy must have forgotten ABC staff walked out in protest last week. Morrison then reminded all of Australia that: “The (ABC) board is responsible to ensure the organisation is well run, and I think they had a pretty ordinary week. “I think the decisions that were made this week by the former chair were the right decisions, and (acting chairwoman) Ferguson needs to get on, settle the ship down, and make sure they get back to doing what they should do in an independent and unbiased way, to get the facts right and to ensure they perform the duties the Australian people pay them to do. “I mean, let’s go back to what happened. There was an article written by Emma Alberici and it was a shocker, and how do I know that? Because the ABC said it was a shocker ... they ripped it down because it was riddled with errors. “I raised concerns about that article too, and the news team dealt with it and I was satisfied with the response, and that’s where it ended. “And I expect the ABC board to do better, and if they don’t, well, they can expect a bit more attention from me.” I love the ABC but sometimes it reminds me of rich kids living off a trust fund. Growing up in regional Queensland, for a long time, there were only two channels – the ABC and Channel 10. I remember sitting down to watch the ABC news at 7pm. For a kid in a country town, it was my insight into the “big smoke” – Brisbane – and the rest of the world. The reporters – especially the political reporters – had such gravitas. The culture of an ABC journalist is generally different to others. Most reporters have a disdain for authority, but some ABC reporters over recent times have mixed this disdain with a sense of entitlement that comes from the belief they cannot be criticised because they are independent of government. And that is true. We need and rightly demand that our public broadcaster report without fear or favour, but that doesn’t shield the ABC from inaccuracies. It is also important to remember the difference between privately owned and publicly listed media companies and the public broadcaster, which is funded by taxpayers. There are regulatory and legal differences, and the ABC has a charter that it must abide by. In a world of digital disruption, where journalists have taken voluntary and involuntary redundancies, this is the sharp end of the difference between private media companies and the ABC. The ABC is not immune to funding cuts (and it has not received less money, just no extra to cover inflation). It has a $1 billion annual budget. Ferguson should ensure the ABC gets back to basics. More time needs to be spent reporting on drought, indigenous issues, China’s influence, workforce issues, the country-city divide, national and international security, and our changing economy. Scott Morrison, Malcolm Turnbull and Mitch Fifield have every right to point out factual errors on the public broadcaster. This is not interfering with the ABC’s independence. Ferguson needs to remind the ABC of this, while rebuilding the broadcaster to ensure all Australians again accept its news service as gospel.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 14:16
|
|
|
Anidav posted:When asked about the issue on the program, Morrison said: “Look, I think the ABC needs to stop talking about itself and get back to work.” Pot, meet Kettle.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 14:23
|
|
|
Watching doccos on SBS while on holiday down south and holy poo poo has it been ruined by advertising. They run about 5 ads on repeat every 10 mins and it's every bit as poo poo as trying to watch something on 7. Also Lambie is a racist peice of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 15:14
|
|
|
Don Dongington posted:Watching doccos on SBS while on holiday down south and holy poo poo has it been ruined by advertising. Imagine trying to watch foreign porn that way.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 15:17
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Imagine trying to watch foreign porn that way. As long as they don't run ads more often than every 40 seconds it should be ok.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 20:13
|
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:Imagine trying to watch foreign porn that way. It's called edging
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 21:50
|
|
|
le edging.
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 22:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 22:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 22:48
|
|
|
I guess the "THE UNIONS ARE COMING BACK" message isn't working, so might as well go the racist route
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2018 23:44
|
|
|
Mr Turnbull pointed out he was behind 51 to 49 per cent in the published polls but was actually ahead by four points in internal tracking polls across 40 marginal seats. "But for reasons that they've not been able to explain, you know, there was an element of the party and of the media that wanted to blow the government up, and they did," he said in a recording of his remarks obtained by Nine News. "And of course, they didn't get their guy up; they got ScoMo [Scott Morrison]." So the LNP had polls where they held on to government? Weird polling methods?
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 00:03
|
|
|
You Am I posted:I guess the "THE UNIONS ARE COMING BACK" message isn't working, so might as well go the racist route Auspol October - might as well go the racist route Hey, it's October! Someone get on that next thread.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 00:15
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Mr Turnbull pointed out he was behind 51 to 49 per cent in the published polls but was actually ahead by four points in internal tracking polls across 40 marginal seats. I'm pretty sure a lot of those single seat polls are not much better than having a guess, but it would make sense to me that some swing seats would be way more comfortable with Turnbull than other potentials.
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 00:16
|
|
|
They may have asked questions like "How likely are you to vote Liberal next election" and "How likely are you to vote for a Malcolm Turnbull lead Coalition next election"
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 00:32
|
|
|
Respectfully, someone should make a spookey october OP but I can't be bothered
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 01:41
|
|
|
Same
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 01:52
|
|
|
I could run a new brand poll
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 01:52
|
|
|
bell jar posted:Respectfully, someone should make a spookey october OP but I can't be bothered Nothing but pictures of Dutton
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 02:04
|
|
|
“But then, when you stop being prime minister, that’s it. There is no way I would be hanging around like limpet Kevin Rudd or Tony Abbott – seriously, these people are like, sort of miserable, miserable ghosts.”
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 02:29
|
|
|
MysticalMachineGun posted:Nothing but pictures of Dutton I thought pumpkins were the October veggie, not potatoes
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 02:41
|
|
|
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Peter-Dutton-Celebrity-Mask/153109837155?hash=item23a60eb563:g:T4AAAOSwY3tbRhAV
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 02:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 03:18 |
|
|
I would blow Dane Cook posted:“But then, when you stop being prime minister, that’s it. There is no way I would be hanging around like limpet Kevin Rudd or Tony Abbott – seriously, these people are like, sort of miserable, miserable ghosts.” https://twitter.com/turnbullmalcolm/status/1046572838981971969?s=21
|
|
#
?
Oct 1, 2018 02:54
|
|