|
Interesting that this Apache has an “N” number on the forward quarter there. N being the ICAO country prefix for a civilian aircraft registered in the US Also the rifle appears to be similar to the “Carbon” variant of the Remington 700 from The Division 2 which IMFDB says is “fitted with an XLR Tactical Buttstock and Carbon Chassis.” Julius CSAR fucked around with this message at 22:09 on Jun 4, 2021 |
#
?
Jun 4, 2021 22:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 22:44 |
|
|
Oh my god what if this battlefield has no specific countries and it’s all just mercenaries fighting each other while being tacitly supported by major powers
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2021 22:25
|
|
|
Julius CSAR posted:Interesting that this Apache has an “N” number on the forward quarter there. N being the ICAO country prefix for a civilian aircraft registered in the US Some Apaches have carried civil registrations prior to export to FMS customers overseas, they might've used that as a reference for the model and not known that detail. Like the weird Czech-Russian Hinds in MW3, just offhand.
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2021 22:31
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:Oh my god what if this battlefield has no specific countries and it’s all just mercenaries fighting each other while being tacitly supported by major powers The leaks, if you believe them, were pointing towards post/on-going climate change catastrophes leading to redrawn borders and merc/multi-national forces Sent to JackFrags from BF 
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2021 22:34
|
|
|
jisforjosh posted:The leaks, if you believe them, were pointing towards post/on-going climate change catastrophes leading to redrawn borders and merc/multi-national forces To be fair if they intentionally had the civilian tail number on there because in-game the faction using it had stolen and modified it that would imply some pretty rad weapons would be in the game too
|
|
#
?
Jun 4, 2021 22:45
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:Oh my god what if this battlefield has no specific countries and it’s all just mercenaries fighting each other while being tacitly supported by major powers That seems to be the politically correct way to make war games these days.
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2021 00:40
|
|
|
is Wook Wook still a thing? This might sound a little lame but some of the most fun I had was a server admins goon stacking us on one side and steam rolling the disorganized pubbies. (Back in BF3)
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2021 00:49
|
|
|
Revitalized posted:is Wook Wook still a thing? Hadlock has 3 Bitcoin that were donated back in BF3 or whenever that will fund the servers. Granted if he sells all 3 bitcoins the price will crash
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2021 01:05
|
|
|
jisforjosh posted:Hadlock has 3 Bitcoin that were donated back in BF3 or whenever that will fund the servers. Granted if he sells all 3 bitcoins the price will crash So it's win-win!
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 15:49
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:Oh my god what if this battlefield has no specific countries and it’s all just mercenaries fighting each other while being tacitly supported by major powers Works for Escape from Tarkov
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 15:55
|
|
|
Really hoping we get some gameplay instead of a generic CGI action trailer.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 15:56
|
|
|
henpod posted:Really hoping we get some gameplay instead of a generic CGI action trailer. if it's an official reveal they'll absolutely show gameplay several game screenshots have been linked.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 16:08
|
|
|
Al-Saqr posted:if it's an official reveal they'll absolutely show gameplay several game screenshots have been linked. Cue JackFrags et al posting their videos reviewing the trailer with "so I played the game a few months back"
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 18:13
|
|
|
Jackfrags, tommo, and Stodeh made a warzone video a few months ago where they talked a bunch about EA game changers and how they missed it and couldn't wait for it to come back. They never brought it back up after that. I said at the time that I thought that was them dropping hints that they had either played BF6 or been invited to play BF6 and I still think that's true, especially because Warzone has catapulted Jackfrags and Stodeh to new levels of popularity and made Tommo's career and I'd be shocked of they weren't the first 3 to get to reveal the game. They are the only BF streamers/YouTubers who have continued to rise in popularity after BFV's failure.
|
|
#
?
Jun 7, 2021 19:37
|
|
|
BF 4 multiplayer continues to own after all these years. It's the little moments that make it worthwhile. https://streamable.com/qrcibe https://streamable.com/t1j4it
|
|
#
?
Jun 8, 2021 10:47
|
|
|
It's coming! Edit - I think this was a bad link. 
Gucci Loafers fucked around with this message at 05:53 on Jun 9, 2021 |
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 01:46
|
|
|
Battlefield: Ibiza
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 02:51
|
|
|
Here's the real youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP3wxNFnNbA
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 05:12
|
|
|
9 hours to glory here we goooooooo Last chance for wild rumor mongering and speculation go go go I predict the AK-12 will be the best assault rifle in the game googogog
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 05:59
|
|
|
Does anyone know if it's still using the Frostbite engine?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 06:00
|
|
|
Crosby B. Alfred posted:Does anyone know if it's still using the Frostbite engine? It’s using something more powerful, it’s using the ‘Russian winter of 1942’ engine
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 06:06
|
|
|
I hope I get to be a cyber man who can jack into mainframes and spike databases With a gun
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 08:22
|
|
|
Guys? I am hyped.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 08:50
|
|
|
hope is the first step on the road to disappointment
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 10:40
|
|
|
Hype is the first step towards getting owned
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 10:43
|
|
|
Not to open a can of worms but what's the consensus on why BFV wasn't good? I ended up entirely skipping this one but I haven't seen a lot of positivity around it?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 12:44
|
|
|
Read like every third page of this topic where people re hash why they didn’t like it
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 12:53
|
|
|
Au Revoir Shosanna posted:Not to open a can of worms but what's the consensus on why BFV wasn't good? No UFOs
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:05
|
|
|
FastestGunAlive posted:Read like every third page of this topic where people re hash why they didn’t like it oh right yeah there's 400 pages of this discussion lol my bad
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:25
|
|
|
Au Revoir Shosanna posted:Not to open a can of worms but what's the consensus on why BFV wasn't good? Lack of content first and foremost. The maps overall lacked both in quantity and quality. Game felt cobbled together and the switching back and forth in TTK/gunplay during the life of the game was detrimental.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:28
|
|
|
No Eastern Front
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:33
|
|
|
Is it really going to be a motherfucking god drat orange peel futuristic shooter? Hopefully it isn't too off the wall. And hopefully its loving good for a change. 8 years now since BF4. We wont talk about anything thats come since (to me the engine itself is a lot of the problem, game hasn't felt right in any of the, albeit brief instances I've played since.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:40
|
|
|
codo27 posted:Is it really going to be a motherfucking god drat orange peel futuristic shooter? Hopefully it isn't too off the wall. And hopefully its loving good for a change. 8 years now since BF4. We wont talk about anything thats come since (to me the engine itself is a lot of the problem, game hasn't felt right in any of the, albeit brief instances I've played since. It’s going to be a modern game set ten years in the future, it will probably feature nightmarish climate change effects, may actually be more ‘mercenaries backed by governments’ rather than the US or Chinese or Russian militaries themselves, either ways, we will find out what’s the deal in ONE HOUR
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:46
|
|
|
Au Revoir Shosanna posted:Not to open a can of worms but what's the consensus on why BFV wasn't good? It was definitely a "total package" type failure. -Low content on release and failure to deliver on the 'games as a service' pitch in any meaningful way for a long time. -Bland, soulless visuals compared to previous titles. -Atrocious vehicle progression where they were often completely uncompetitive until the final unlocks. -Lack of iconic locales, Armies, and weapons. They wanted to do lesser known battles but it just didn't work. -Bizarre cosmetics that satisfied absolutely nobody in either the "horny for ww2 milsim" camp or the "outlandish cosmetics are ok" camp. Also there were none of them. It took them like 4 months to release the cosmetics they featured in the Alpha/Beta -Grand Operations were very, very clearly unfinished. Not just content lacking but outright half-baked. -Planes were very unsatisfying to fly. -Planes were also stupidly overpowered for a long time. -Tanks were weak which meant all they could do was sit back and snipe, contributing to the usual "infantry on both teams resenting vehicles" scenario. -Most maps were bad and conquest was the only real mode to play -Hamada -At some point they decided they didn't like the ttk, which was generally considered by the player base the only good part of the game, and changed it. Everyone hated the change, which resulted in the game going through like 4 major ttk phases over a few months as they flopped between 1.0-2.0-1.0-3.0. -The UI was bizzare and sucked rear end It was clear that design decisions alone would have relegated V to the bottom tier of BF games, but being released a year early just sent it down the dumpster chute even faster.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 13:54
|
|
|
Fart Car '97 posted:-Most maps were bad and conquest was the only real mode to play Breakthrough was ok/fun depending on the map, especially for BF1 players since grand ops was such a disaster
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:35
|
|
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:Breakthrough was ok/fun depending on the map, especially for BF1 players since grand ops was such a disaster I liked BF1’s Operations mode quite a bit!
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:38
|
|
|
I really liked BFV's gunplay and the new pacific maps were a lot of fun. Everything else was pretty meh. I don't know how a UI could be so annoying to use.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:42
|
|
|
Fart Car '97 posted:It was definitely a "total package" type failure. -Player models being indistinguishable from the background -Back-prone (although I do find back prone very funny as an image when it's a guy with a loving MG between their legs spraying indiscriminately) -Lack of quality vehicles, especially transport vehicles -Insistence on an animation for everything -The low ammo count that you could hold at launch -Vehicle resupplying being a thing
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:48
|
|
|
Hot Diggity! posted:-Player models being indistinguishable from the background Getting rid of spotting was good but coupled with player visibility it was terrible The low ammo count was ok in theory because it made you rely on Support players except 1. There were ammo/health resupply points buildable by anyone so Support players weren't really needed and 2. Everyone played Assault because it was anti-infantry, anti-tank, and eventually even anti-air so why play any other class?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 22:44 |
|
|
5 minutes to go fuckos
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2021 14:56
|
|