|
wot in the hell happened
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 13:25
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 07:06 |
|
|
the liberal shut the gently caress up 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 13:28
|
|
|
hello again old friend
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 14:41
|
|
|
LT2012 was occasionally entertaining imo, but more importantly it’s 100% bullshit to perma posters by enforcing rules that weren’t in effect when/where they posted. There is no need to be “fair to the mods” when they make indefensible decisions.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 15:06
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jval6WwknUU
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 15:19
|
|
|
really queer Christmas posted:hello again old friend hosed up to say this when no one has posted the goat man
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 15:23
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:LT2012 was occasionally entertaining imo, but more importantly it’s 100% bullshit to perma posters by enforcing rules that weren’t in effect when/where they posted. There is no need to be “fair to the mods” when they make indefensible decisions. Mods .... are bad?
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 15:24
|
|
|
But seriously gently caress the mods
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 15:25
|
|
|
Tastykake posted:hosed up to say this when no one has posted the goat man this entire thread is dnd showing its gaping anus toward cspam
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 16:10
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:But seriously gently caress the mods
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:15
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:LT2012 was occasionally entertaining imo, but more importantly it’s 100% bullshit to perma posters by enforcing rules that weren’t in effect when/where they posted. There is no need to be “fair to the mods” when they make indefensible decisions. but we need to purge anyone who isn't 100% sure that Bernie, a politician who has not yet even so much as filed as a candidate for the 2020 presidential election, is going to win the election like seriously getting back to the actual primaries for a moment, with gabbard running is actually a sign that bernie is leaning towards sitting out. I'm guessing he has a deal with warren where warren goes in first and see how she floats and if she does well enough bernie sits out if she doe badly enough/fades bernie comes in. Typo fucked around with this message at 17:27 on Jan 17, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:17
|
|
|
if anyone other than TRUMP was president I'm actually not sure how much his affects biden in a dem primary cuz while there might be veiled references to it the field might stop short of blasting this sort of stuff at him (the general will be no-bar hold though) but since TRUMP will be tweeting poo poo like this at him about 5 times an hour for sure it's gonna be front and center
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:19
|
|
|
Typo posted:but we need to purge anyone who isn't 100% sure that Bernie, a politician who has not yet even so much as filed as a candidate for the 2020 presidential election, is going to win the election 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:27
|
|
|
Typo posted:but we need to purge anyone who isn't 100% sure that Bernie, a politician who has not yet even so much as filed as a candidate for the 2020 presidential election, is going to win the election He gonna win
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:29
|
|
|
Typo posted:but we need to purge anyone who isn't 100% sure that Bernie, a politician who has not yet even so much as filed as a candidate for the 2020 presidential election, is going to win the election POST YOUR MAAAAAAP
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:34
|
|
|
I mean again, to be serious for a moment, I like Bernie and think his policies and willingness to stand behind a progressive agenda come 2020 (unless ummm, the senate is 50-50 or 49-51 D-R in which case welp) especially after Obama basically waffled on passing anything more serious than seriously watered down healthcare plan. And if he gets into the general his chances of winning isn't really all that different from any other dem other than maybeeee Brown (who has a better chance imo) and literal hillary clinton redux (who obvsly has much worse chance of winning). I just think in probability terms 1) he might not run because he's old and it's fairly obvious he's looking for someone to take up his mantle (warren seems to be that person atm) and 2) even if he does run, in a 16 horse-race primary scenario, no one horse is the favorite to win Typo fucked around with this message at 17:37 on Jan 17, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:35
|
|
|
Typo posted:I mean again, to be serious for a moment, I like Bernie and think his policies and willingness to stand behind a progressive agenda come 2020 (unless ummm, the senate is 50-50 or 49-51 D-R in which case welp) especially after Obama basically waffled on passing anything more serious than seriously watered down healthcare plan. And if he gets into the general his chances of winning isn't really all that different from any other dem other than maybeeee Brown (who has a better chance imo) and literal hillary clinton redux (who obvsly has much worse chance of winning). There's gotta be a few gullible republican senators that he can bribe with cabinet appointments and then immediately fire
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:44
|
|
|
bernie is a born LOSER he doesnt stand a chance
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
Typo posted:I mean again, to be serious for a moment, I like Bernie and think his policies and willingness to stand behind a progressive agenda come 2020 (unless ummm, the senate is 50-50 or 49-51 D-R in which case welp) especially after Obama basically waffled on passing anything more serious than seriously watered down healthcare plan. And if he gets into the general his chances of winning isn't really all that different from any other dem other than maybeeee Brown (who has a better chance imo) and literal hillary clinton redux (who obvsly has much worse chance of winning). He's already hiring staff, he's running.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
Typo posted:in a 16 horse-race primary scenario, no one horse is the favorite to win
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:47
|
|
|
in probability terms, and in horse-racing terms,
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:48
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:There's gotta be a few gullible republican senators that he can bribe with cabinet appointments and then immediately fire if this was still.....2008 or something sure maybe, I mean arlen spectre did switch parties the last time around but the vast majority of both parties in congress have Leninist degree of conformity to their party line/leaders nowadays. With the exception of.....Manchin on the Dem side and Collins/Murkoswski on the GOP side (I guess one of them could switch parties esp murkoswski? But is there any proof at all either would be open to that?). So I think it's unlikely. A lot of the current set of circumstance still go back to hillary's 2016 campaign in which everyone thought she was gonna win, so lots of voters voted for republican senate candidates specifically to "check" hillary's incoming presidency. Which probably dragged down 1-2 dem senate candidates who could probably would have being the tipping point for effective control in 2020.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:48
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:in probability terms, and in horse-racing terms, I don't like horses. They are coarse and rough and irritating and they get everywhere.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:55
|
|
|
Typo posted:if this was still.....2008 or something sure maybe, I mean arlen spectre did switch parties the last time around Lol, Collins isn't a moderate aisle crosser you rube.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:56
|
|
|
Ah thanks, I don't venture into CSPAM much and assumed it was D&D's FYAD-lite, a la Imp Zone, didn't realize it had rules lol.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
Thoguh posted:Lol, Collins isn't a moderate aisle crosser you rube. yeah collins is still pretty conservative, but the fact that she is the -second- closest person you have to a switch-over potential shows how unlikely a senator party flipping is
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:57
|
|
|
bring back earmarks and just bribe Senators with pork to vote your way
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 17:59
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:bring back earmarks and just bribe Senators with pork to vote your way this is unironically a good idea but is never, ever gonna happen because it's bad electoral optics, and also I'm not sure how much pork is required to get senators to break with party line these days because even if state X gets bribed a zillion dollars they mght still hate [pelosi/shumer/mcconnel/trump/dem president] more than they like the $$$ what I'm saying is that democracies don't actually work and Xi Jiping thought is the future
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:00
|
|
|
i think in probability terms, in a 16-person game of yahtzee, no one horse is most likely to get a yahtzee,
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:00
|
|
|
Typo posted:what I'm saying is that democracies don't actually work and Xi Jiping thought is the future China is a democracy, dude
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:China is a democracy, dude sorry, I meant western democracy
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
TrilliontonNixon posted:Ah thanks, I don't venture into CSPAM much and assumed it was D&D's FYAD-lite, a la Imp Zone, didn't realize it had rules lol. No mods, no masters.
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:03
|
|
|
Typo posted:yeah collins is still pretty conservative, but the fact that she is the -second- closest person you have to a switch-over potential shows how unlikely a senator party flipping is There's gotta be someone angling for the respectable maverick gimmick now that McCain's crashing planes in hell
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:03
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:There's gotta be someone angling for the respectable maverick gimmick now that McCain's crashing planes in hell well...the list is basically: Romney (LOL) Collins (...) Murkoswski and there's like no incentive imo for Senator Lisa to switch in a Alaska when the state's PVI is what R+9, and plus she's probably genuinely fairly conservative as well and probably isn't voting for M4A in any case
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:05
|
|
|
TrilliontonNixon posted:Ah thanks, I don't venture into CSPAM much and assumed it was D&D's FYAD-lite, a la Imp Zone, didn't realize it had rules lol. in truth, cspam has but one rule: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:09
|
|
|
Typo posted:well...the list is basically: Just smh that more republican senators don't recognize any opportunity to grift a bunch of idiot liberals
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:13
|
|
|
Terror Sweat posted:Mods .... are bad? all mods are cops are bastards
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:50
|
|
|
Calibanibal posted:i think in probability terms, in a 16-person game of yahtzee, no one horse is most likely to get a yahtzee,
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:51
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:China is a democracy, dude do u guys remember when chinese democracy happened b4 the album 'chinese democracy' came out
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 07:06 |
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:POST YOUR MAAAAAAP 
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2019 18:52
|
|
