|
ELO Musk posted:Is this what accomplishment looks like after 40 smdh We cant all have our armies cross the rubicon
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 15:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:16 |
|
|
ELO Musk posted:Is this what accomplishment looks like after 40 smdh Eh, when you've already wasted the fun part of your life you take what you can get. I am not the one who goatse'd a reporter about their hall of fame ballot if that's what you're talking about
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 15:24
|
|
|
Shad Khan dropped his bid to buy Wembly. Can't wait to see how Britain handles the NFL trying to strong arm them into building a mult-billion dollar stadium for a team they don't want.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:09
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Shad Khan dropped his bid to buy Wembly. Can't wait to see how Britain handles the NFL trying to strong arm them into building a mult-billion dollar stadium for a team they don't want. Eh? Wembley wasnt built for the NFL, unless i misunderstood what you meant.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:13
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Shad Khan dropped his bid to buy Wembly. Can't wait to see how Britain handles the NFL trying to strong arm them into building a mult-billion dollar stadium for a team they don't want. The new Spurs stadium is built for NFL, so that would probably be a contender for a new team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Eh? Wembley wasnt built for the NFL, unless i misunderstood what you meant. The NFL thinks they'll have a team in London in 2022 and seemed to be betting on Shad getting Wembly to make it happen.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:28
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:The NFL thinks they'll have a team in London in 2022 and seemed to be betting on Shad getting Wembly to make it happen. Right? But thats not the purpose Wembley was built for, so the NFL didnt strongarm Britain (and you mean England here) into anything
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:29
|
|
|
I think this speaks more to Craven Cottage getting an extended life than anything NFL related.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1052584473081077760 https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1052584995980800000
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:48
|
|
|
They need to just get Peterman off that roster.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:50
|
|
|
What would happen if we merged the Bills and Raiders?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
they'd still be more viable than the chargers https://twitter.com/SethWickersham/status/1052586039360049152
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:52
|
|
|
iospace posted:What would happen if we merged the Bills and Raiders? The Browns would finally have some competition?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 16:53
|
|
|
Folks, https://mobile.twitter.com/PFF_Seahawks/status/1052352736610508801
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:07
|
|
|
iospace posted:What would happen if we merged the Bills and Raiders? people would be stabbing each other in the rear end with knives
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:38
|
|
|
Psh, call me when their line blocks real pass rushers, like DeMarcus Lawrence or Aaron Donald
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:39
|
|
|
Vertical Lime posted:they'd still be more viable than the chargers gently caress off Dean
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:40
|
|
|
Vertical Lime posted:they'd still be more viable than the chargers turns out pissing off the majority of your fanbase thirsting after a city who didn't want them was gonna be a bad thing?! Hot drat.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:40
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Right? But thats not the purpose Wembley was built for, so the NFL didnt strongarm Britain (and you mean England here) into anything Yes so now to get a place to play the NFL will attempt to strong arm London (since we need to be super specific now) into building a stadium for a team the people of London don't want.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:43
|
|
|
Durandal1707 posted:turns out pissing off the majority of your fanbase thirsting after a city who didn't want them was gonna be a bad thing?! I love how literally everyone except the Spanos clan foresaw that this was gonna go badly. Now you have the chargers star RB talking about how much he hates LA and misses San Diego
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:48
|
|
|
Sounds like a good RB. What’s this talented young man’s name?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
Melvin Gordon?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:10
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Melvin Gordon? Triggered
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:10
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Yes so now to get a place to play the NFL will attempt to strong arm London (since we need to be super specific now) into building a stadium for a team the people of London don't want. Premier League clubs have to pay for their own stadiums so I'm not sure the NFL would have much luck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:17
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:Yes so now to get a place to play the NFL will attempt to strong arm London (since we need to be super specific now) into building a stadium for a team the people of London don't want. Are you foreseeing some kind of scheduling conflict with Wembley or the new White Hart Lane that will mean you can't play 8 games a year there? Or are you saying that the owner of whatever team wants to move there is going to have to pressure the local authorities into building a new stadium? Because no amount of strong arming will be effective or even requires in the latter. Just lots and lots and lots of palm greasing, backhanders, and cut-ins. The prospective owner will have to be highly amenable to enabling the local corruption to get anything past the pipe dream stage.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:20
|
|
|
Would San Diego welcome the Chargers back with open arms?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:22
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:Would San Diego welcome the Chargers back with open arms? Minus the Spanos's I'd imagine yes. That requires a lot of sudden deaths though. I don't think SD would as long as they own the team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
Grittybeard posted:Minus the Spanos's I'd imagine yes. That requires a lot of sudden deaths though. They want the Chargers back. They'd prefer it without the Spanoses but I still think they want their team back more than anything
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:25
|
|
|
If the Spanos built a new stadium wouldn't they be able to make a lot of money off it? I mean, San Diego is a very attractive location for many events.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:27
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:If the Spanos built a new stadium wouldn't they be able to make a lot of money off it? I mean, San Diego is a very attractive location for many events. Absolutely. San Diego would automatically be added to the superbowl rotation, would host college football playoff games, NCAA final four games, world cup games, etc. They dont have the money to do that, however.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:28
|
|
|
a neat cape posted:Melvin Gordon? Bosa's death changed you
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 18:44
|
|
|
Fire Safety Doug posted:Premier League clubs have to pay for their own stadiums so I'm not sure the NFL would have much luck. That's the point and NFL owners loathe putting money toward a stadium. Finger Prince posted:Are you foreseeing some kind of scheduling conflict with Wembley or the new White Hart Lane that will mean you can't play 8 games a year there? Or are you saying that the owner of whatever team wants to move there is going to have to pressure the local authorities into building a new stadium? Because no amount of strong arming will be effective or even requires in the latter. Just lots and lots and lots of palm greasing, backhanders, and cut-ins. The prospective owner will have to be highly amenable to enabling the local corruption to get anything past the pipe dream stage. I'm saying I expect the NFL to pull the standard NFL bullshit when it comes to getting a stadium built. The difference this time is nobody actually wants the team moved there. Should make for a bigger fiasco than the Chargers move to LA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:04
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:That's the point and NFL owners loathe putting money toward a stadium. Who would pay for it? London council will tell them to gently caress themselves as they are already paying off Wembley and the Olympic Village.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:13
|
|
|
CyberPingu posted:Who would pay for it? Ches Neckbeard posted:Should make for a bigger fiasco than the Chargers move to LA.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:14
|
|
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:That's the point and NFL owners loathe putting money toward a stadium. What's the standard NFL bullshit? We'll take our ball and go home? That's a bluff easily called. Some people might be a little upset that there won't be any more London games, but nobody will miss it or fight to keep them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
NFL to review Dolphins reporting of Tannehill injury http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000975291/article/nfl-to-review-dolphins-reporting-of-tannehill-injury Don't the Pats play injury roulette every week by listing players who are clearly going to play as questionable? I mean, anyone who plays fantasy football sees that week in week out. Not that anything will come of this but seriously, what's the point?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Finger Prince posted:What's the standard NFL bullshit? We'll take our ball and go home? That's a bluff easily called. Some people might be a little upset that there won't be any more London games, but nobody will miss it or fight to keep them. How many more ways do I have to say it's going to be a shitshow before you understand it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Major Ryan posted:NFL to review Dolphins reporting of Tannehill injury Lol you think that the Patriots are under the same scrutiny?
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:33
|
|
|
Major Ryan posted:NFL to review Dolphins reporting of Tannehill injury Gambling. That and fantasy football are gigantic industries that rely on that data. And a number of years back the NFL changed the rules that listed out the requirements, and one is that if a player misses some chunk of practice, for any reason, they should be listed as questionable. So the Patriots follow that to a T, which means Brady and Gronk get listed as questionable pretty often, because they get extra rest.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 22:16 |
|
|
Derek Anderson is going to outduel Andy Luck
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2018 19:51
|
|
