Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

SickZip posted:

Dear God at how hard you guys are working to pretend that ethnic/in-group favoritism isn't a basic and universal bit of cognitive bias and prejudice. Spending thousands of words on justification and establishment of Proper Leftist Credentials and Dogma before your willing to even indirectly address the matter is insane.

there is not a shortage of jewish socialists, and yet, weirdly, the NYT SickZip views as a hive of degenerate jewry is unwilling to extend them the same courtesies it extends to a Ross Douthat or an Erik Prince.

wonder why

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Volkerball posted:

I couldn't tell you where it started, but when I first noticed it was during the course of the uprising in Syria, and I do tend to think it rose to a pretty high level throughout it. There's been a number of pieces out since then that outline what has since been dubbed red-brown convergence, but I'll illustrate it this way. If I speak to someone who tells me that Bashar al-Assad is fighting terrorism, and that we need to support him and Russia because the alternate is people like Hillary Clinton and the American center/liberals who would risk or want to start world war 3 regime changing him. That the only Syrians worth mentioning are terrorists, and that ISIS is backed by US democrats who are in the pockets of the 9/11 committing Saudi royal jihadists. That reports of Assad's human rights abuses are overblown or flat out lies perpetrated by the mainstream media and the American establishment that has lied to us before, and by Syrian jihadist networks that fabricate evidence and stories to try to get support for an American invasion. I would have no loving clue what ideology that person subscribed to, I would just know that it starts with "far." People curious about why this is have done the dirty work finding some of the common sources that central players in each ideologies pundits rely on. SPLC had a really good piece on it that was taken down after Max Blumenthal threatened legal action. I think it still gets passed around via web archive but I don't have time to find it.

I first became aware of the communo-fascist conspiracy against the United States, Mandrake, during the physical act of love

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Tab8715 posted:

Don't get me wrong. I agree. I'm not religious but I sure as hope there's hell because there's a few folks who should visit eternally.

That said, I don't agree with any sort of vigilante justice because it isn't. Selec's earlier solution is much more rational although I am incredibly curious why it hasn't been done.

because they do not make money by telling you they hosed up.

if you sit around waiting for people to administer justice to themselves, you are still going to be waiting on judgement day

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

axeil posted:

Yeah, the point of the Daily Show after about 2003 or so wasn't that it was making fun of politics but it was mostly about making fun of media and using public shame/ridicule to try and make them better. Colbert did the same thing with talking head shows, except he was so successful that a lot of people didn't realize it was satire.

I have a feeling Stewert would be getting a lot of miles out of the :decorum: and both-sides fetishism the NYTimes crowd has these days.

That The Daily Show was a comedy show is probably why it was able to be so successful at its criticism. "Only the court jester can criticize the king" and all. It requires a good deal of understanding and introspection to make good satirical comedy. This is why conservative humor always fails, because there's no self-reflection or consistency at all.

https://twitter.com/adamjohnsonNYC/status/865055182652100608

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/u9jqcs/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-henry-kissinger-pt--1

yeah, that's a guy who would be in a real fuckin' hurry to mock people rolling over and showing their bellies whenever someone with power so much as glances in their direction

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

Spun Dog posted:

And didn't narc out whistleblowers.

did he narc out a whistleblower at some point, or is this another bit of that wonderful snarl-word game where because a bad thing happened the guy you already hate must have been responsible

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Yeowch!!! My Balls!!!
May 31, 2006

lol

please lay out how you believe Glenn Greenwald narced on Reality Winner, this should be good

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply